Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bank Cashiers? Do they sell to?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am unemployed and recently applied for a position a cashier at Abbey. I was told there would be no selling involved but after reading several of the threads in here I am beginning to suspect otherwise.

 

So my question is as a cashier would I be expected to sell to customers?

 

I have a second interview with them next week if selling is involved I will not be attending the interview. I do not have the energy for a high pressure job at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mochamoo- Yes cashier's do sell, 'cross selling, offering customer's new products to suit their needs' (:confused: if I need it i'll go out and look for it)

 

But I would ask them- I know the Halifax have a system that suggest's products (Ironically- Customer SALES Process its called, or was!) - when processing transactions, this would offer products, or would guarantee acceptance to them- eg. it would enable you to guarantee a customer £1000 limit on a visa, more likely to say yes if guaranteed!

 

And they're bound to be targetted.

 

But hey- Im only a salesman!!!! lmao.

  • Haha 1

AB123uk

 

IF MY COMMENTS ARE USEFUL, PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES!

 

Halifax Staff Current Account WON

Lloyds WON

Yorkshire WON

Halifax Staff Visa WON

 

 

If CAG Helped you..... Why not help CAG!

Click Donate at the top of the forum!

Oyster- I fought the Lloyds will have it's mark in history- have you downloaded your Official Charges Track?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

This is an interesting question which can be cloked in various ways of putting it. Are you selling to tell someone that you can save them money on say their mortgage? Are you selling to someone who say is paying huge amounts of money on credit cards when a loan(excluding the PPI) will save them money for them? Is it is selling to offer a cash ISA to someone who gets peanuts on a current account? It is a matter of interpretation and there are many times when i think we are selling and many times when i think we are serving our customers. It is a sales job but it is how you interpret selling/service that counts really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Nattie,

 

I quite agree with you that it's a matter of interpretation.

 

I work for a 'Media Company', in the sales department, so the customers who come through to us EXPECT to be sold to. (That's mainly why they are calling.)

 

Our training is such that we let the customers know which services are available to them, find out which ones they want, and then question them about their needs. ie, which programs they want to have on the TV, to what useage the internet will be put, (downloading, games playing, simple browsing etc), and how much and when the telephone is used and the types of call.

 

We then RECOMMEND which services would be best for them and the reasons why. (This is the theory, at least, and one which is generally adhered to.)

 

Funnily enough, when this process is NOT followed, there tends to be UNDERselling, as the customer may not have the information about the differing services we offer, and may take the cheapest, but not necessarily the most cost-effective, option(s).

 

If the same sort of criteria were applied to banking/financial customers, then there would be far less accusations of staff being pressurised into selling as the process lends itself to guiding the customer to the products which are right for them. The customers would have an understanding of what they were purchasing, and more importantly, why.

 

As you rightly imply, matching products/benefits to needs is ethical selling, and there the banks seem to fall down, (not only banks of course, overselling is prevelant in many industries), but, it doesn't necessarily have to be that way.

 

PeteCC

 

And as a BTW, I recently went overdrawn bya few pounds, was willing to reluctantly accept the 'penalty', then had charge upon charge applied to the tune of £190.00. All successfully waived.

  • Haha 1

NatWest, claimed £521.00, settled in full.

Data Protection Act to LTSB (sent 15th June) Received statements 10/7/2006. Claiming £570.50. Sent claim 17th July Reply received 21st July. (sent LBA 22nd July) Then the procrastination started. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/11169-peters-progress.html

Settled in full £905.18, confirmation faxed to the court the day before I appeared, which meant I didn't know 'til the Judge told me.

Letter requesting disclosure of account info from Thoburn's bailiffs. (sent) Data Protection Act to follow.

Ooh, the suspenders is killing me!

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the sentiments of Nattie's post. I don't use counter services very often but if a cashier can suggest a better product than the one I'm using then I'm happy to listen and act on it if I feel it is appropriate.

 

What I do object to is (for example) going in to pay in a cheque to have someone try to sell me a loan. They've enough adverts around the branch for that sort of stuff and I don't need 'advising'.

 

I do however realise that they're just acting on instructions and I can't think of an occasion when a polite 'no thank you' hasn't dealt with the matter.

If in doubt read the

FAQs

 

If still in doubt - ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My main concern, is being pressured to sell things to customers! I have no qualms about suggesting other services if it will help them.

 

my motto in life is: "if in doubt dont." you are clearly doubting embarking on a career as a cashier ;)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have worked in a nmber of institutions including Abbey and RBS.

I agree with Nattie, that I would personally only ever recommend better products to customers.Then again I viewed the whole process a lot differently from my managers!!(lol)

I remeber being in trouble when a customer wanted to pay a sum into a (client of his) bank account (in different bank).

Colleague was going to get a Transfer done at the cost of £35.00 or thereabouts.

I suggested that since he had the other customers bank details, why didn't he withdraw money in cash and pay it directly in at our local branch of his clients bank .(This being free)

Customer was delighted, manager was not.

My response was well my job title says "customer service" and in the long run this may advantagous for us i.e the customer feels that we are trustworthy and not always trying to rip customer off!!!!

Its all about the way that you approach customers.We had "suggested phrases" which I ignored.

Often been told off about discussing things which were not connected with banking.My point here is that this was the way I built up customer relationship.I knew my customers and after having left RBS some years back, still get stopped when doing shopping etc by customers for a chat!

But that is going back a while. I eventually left banking because of pressure to sell and not to serve.

Abbey definitely more pressurised than RBS, due to normally having less staff in smaller branches to spread it out.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, pressurised sales is NOT a good environment to work in, depending on the amount of pressure and the kind of person of course.

 

I find that Sales is a "people game" Customers don't buy from companies, they buy from people. My customers buy from me because:

 

  1. We offer a good price, along with a good service. We're not always the best on price, but we're damned good at delivering the goods!
  2. People trust me to do what I say, and I'm honest when I say it.
  3. They know and trust the company I work for.

Simple really. Not sure how this compares to a bank though, becuase I can imagine it's a "one time sale" rather than repeat business that I work with.

 

Just my 2p's worth.

 

Matt

  • Haha 1

Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely - Lord Acton.

 

Advice offered by MattyH is without predjudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt. Please research any information I have offered, as I will not be held liable for any incorrect advice i've given you.

 

<--------- If my advice has helped, please tip my scales. 8)

 

For Further advice come into the Chat Room: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/chat/flashchat.php

FAQ's : http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

Step By Step Instructions ; http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-example-step-step-instructions.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

My own branch of the RBS can't make much in the way of bonus's. I usually just get a polite "is there anything else I can help you with?", and that's it. Just how I like it. I must say, through all my claim, my branch has been nice and understanding. Just shows the difference between the human face of the bank, and the Turpin-like mentality that appears to filter down from Edinburgh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checking in again, I would say to the thread starter do not work for Abbey. I've heard they are particularly bad for pressure and not a good company to work for.

 

I agree with sentiments that customer's buy from people. I work for Nationwide and we do have targets of sorts. I do particularly well on my leads but the reason is simple. I just look for products that will benefit the customer.

 

Like Nattie said people having lots of cash in a current account (since the interest rate normally drops after a certain amount). I can't get through to some managers though that, when they see me just chatting, it helps the business. I mean would you buy from someone if you paid one item in and they said so where's your mortgage? Or would you be more likely to listen to that person if you had had good service over weeks/months/years. I rest my case!

 

I know it might not look as good in the present in terms of results but we all know it costs more to retain customers than gain new one's. No one financial services provider has the best value or cheapest product in every category, they would make no money, so all you're really left with is reasonable value across the board and an organisation with people you trust.

 

I'm know I'm rambling a bit here but I have seen targets and add on sales becoming more widespread in retail in general and I wish comanies would grasp that they would have more success long term if such add on sales didn't involve flogging stuff which was rubbish. I have a paticular sports store in mind but that's all I'll say :)

 

MattyH reading your post I believe this is exactly how banks and Buidling socites SHOULD work, whether they actually do is another matter.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Only just joined this forum as im getting really fed up with where i work. Abbey cashiers or CSA's as they are known do indeed have targets. Each day they must make a minimum of 4 referals. That means either booking an appointment or the customer sees someone on the spot. Failure to continually meet these targets will lead to you being 'performance managed'. Their bonus scheme is linked to their referals and % over target. They also are required to fill out various questionnaires while you are at the counter. These will cover savings, mortgages etc. On some days they will have a 'race day' and gain prizes for doing the most.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

It is similar in other institutions but I can honestly say if you believe in what you are doing then it doesn't not have to come across as hassling customer. I believe in Nationwide's products in general, I believe it is better to have an organisation that is (at least in principle) supposed to be run for the benefit of its members.

 

When I speak to people I have to judge how clued up they are about thier finances. If they are confident and knowledgeable then that's fine but lots of people are not. That is where we come in, I can honestly say people have saved thousands of pounds as a result of my work. If I had not gotten to know thier committments and needs etc then they would have been worse off. I am not saying that they are getting the best possible deal on every product, the marketplace is competitive, but I do believe we are able to benefit large numbers of consumers.

 

This is the reason why I find Nationwide's head in the sand responce to charges so bizarre. They campaing for things like free cash withdrawals and have a positive order of payments on credit cards. If you are not sure what this means check YOUR credit card. I would put money on the fact that yours will pay off the cheapest debt first (thus maximizing the interest you pay).

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

What I learned from working for Abbey is that the branches are not there to deal with your banking needs, they are essentialy a shop, selling products. If you have an enquiry they will point you everywhere but them to deal with it, either by phone, post, fax, internet. Its unreal!

They are trying to wean customers from visiting a local branch and putting the focus on selling products in branch !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not so hard to understand why, there are stil LOTS of people that stick with one provider for all or most of thier products. this is very profitable hence the focus. I do agree though that, across the industry, the provision for customers in branches is pretty shocking.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes cetainly i agree with you. I was working in the call centre and found that alot branch if not most refuse to do anything for the cust. Most include allowing them to wait in line to be told to phone us for there balance or simple transactions. This is after all apart of their job description! They are simply focused on opening new accounts/credit cards/mortages etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu
This is after all apart of their job description! They are simply focused on opening new accounts/credit cards/mortages etc

 

I think the job description involves filling your quota of sales/referals, which although is a sad indictment of the bank, only reflects the staffs need to comply to the sales pressure put on them by management.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...