Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • When we did a mutual exchange (last year for me), both parties had to go to either the housing association premises or at one of the houses to sign paperwork. You need to see what they have signed, have both properties had an inspection, house efficiency and electrical test done?
    • Include that in your witness statement along with that letter as an exhibit.
    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dozer v Abbey


Dozerblue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone am new to this so please be patient, I sent my SAR to Abbey and after about 6 weeks received all my bank statements, when I totalled the list of charges it came to a massive £5+k, I then sent the letter requesting a refund of these charges and after 14 days received no response, I contacted Abbey on their complaints hotline and they told me that they had sent a letter on the 14th March (never received) that stated that on this occasion they would not even be offering a ogw, has anyone else had a similar letter or should I be worried....the 14 days has now expired should I continue with my LBA or wait for the letter to arrive to see why they will not even offer the ogw

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would definitely continue with your time scale ie send the LBA. Concurrently I would ask them to resend the alledged correspondence that states they are not prepared to refund the sum you have asked.

 

In respect of them not offering to settle, this sounds pretty standard so don't be put off by it :)

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

You want to stick to your deadlines not the Abbeys.

prelim = 14 days. Abbey normally sends a standard letter saying they are investigating your complaint.

LBA = 14 days Abbey will probably send another letter saying that they need another 4 weeks to investigate.

After the 14 days file the claim. You will probably get another letter saying that they could find nothing wrong and that they are acting lawfully.

They are all bog standard letters we all receive and why it's important to stick to your own timetable otherwise they will give you the run around.

 

regards pmahonc

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are quite a few ongoing threads (and successfully completed claims) for over the magic £5k figure. One current is http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/woolwich/59442-what-if-looks-like.html

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

right with some help from josamolly I have done an updated schedule of charges, (thre were not enough columns for all my charges!!!!!) and I have just sent this along with my LBA, roll on 10th April, now on to my next question, I have printed off 3 N1 forms and have started to fill them out ready for the inevitable court action, do I send these to court or deliver them? it is also asking for a solicitors name? what do I do here, I don't have one do I need one? also what is the interest under s69, I have already put down the 8 percent as overdraft interest, am I missing something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dozer,

 

1.N1 forms...send or deliver whichever is convenient. I would deliver them myself because the court staff are very helpful and will point out if you've fogotten anything

 

2. Don't need a solicitor so ignore it

 

3 8% isn't overdraft interest, it's interest that at the discretion of the court you can claim back from the defendant ( ie Abbey). This is s.69 interest.

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well just giving you an update, as expected the Shabby have not replied to my LBA at all, so today am sending off my N1, spoke to a very nice girl at my local court who informed me that 99 per cent of banks are responding to their issue letter and that virtually none go to judgement after 14 days, roll on 14 days thats what I say....maybe they will miss mine....will let you know how it goes

Link to post
Share on other sites

99 per cent of banks are responding to their issue letter and that virtually none go to judgement after 14 days, roll on 14 days thats what I say....maybe they will miss mine....will let you know how it goes

 

She has obviously not been reading up on CAG then.

 

Abbey are 95% of the time acknowledging calims and are defending in full which gives them 28 days from the date it was issued, you will then receive a copy of the defence with a letter offering 50% GOGW (unless they have made an offer to you before).

 

Sorry don't want to be the bearer of bad news but this is how Abbey are dealing with cliams currently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they actually going to court? the threads I have read seem to suggest that they are settling before the court hearing.....don't really fancy going to court and am getting a bit worried.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dozer,

As I am claiming £5+k does this mean that when I go to court I cannot do it through the small claims and will have to fast track?
Missed this the other day. My claim is >£8K (£5K charges + £3K overdraft interest). I sent my draft AQ to Abbey and offered them the choice of SCC or Fast Track. Guess what - they opted for SCC for "reasons of commerciality" or some such nonsense, and I don't really care. The Judge allocated it to SCC. My Bundle's in the post. Roll on 19 April. Regards, Mad Nick

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they actually going to court? the threads I have read seem to suggest that they are settling before the court hearing.....don't really fancy going to court and am getting a bit worried.....

 

As yet they have not gone to court, but you need to be prepared just incase they do decide to go, don't worry about it just yet keep an eye on the dates that are being set by the courts now you have filed your N1, anything you get through the post and you are not sure about post it here and someone will confirm what to do next.

 

I would suggest that you read as many Abbey posts as possible if you are not doing so already, this way you will know what to expect so you will be prepared and ready.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right guys just giving you an update on the story so far, I sent my N1 off to the courts and this was deemed served on the 18th April, Abbey have until 2nd May to respond and whilst I think they will do just that, they have now issued a default, I have sent them the letter saying they can't under the data protection act 1998, but they said they will anyway....what is my next move, is there a template letter for the section 6 clause of the banking code?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mumofthreeboys

Do you know that they have actually entered a default against you? Chances are if they have just issued it, they haven't yet applied it to your file, but you should check.

 

If they have applied it, I would file an N244 and have the default removal added to the POC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right having talked to likelylad on the chat forum, am keeping you up to date on something further. At the moment I have an overdraft with the abbey, which should expire at the end of the year....when I sent my LBA, they requested that I pay back this overdraft or else they would issue a default, I wrote them a letter saying that whilst my account was in dispute they would not be able to issue default proceedings, and followed this up with a phone call, where I was told that they would go a head anyway, I reminded them of section 13 of the banking code, which went totally over their head, but they sent me a letter the following day requesting return of my bank card, I went on line to check my account and found that I could not log on to my internet banking, another call was made to the bank whereupon they informed that due to non payment of my now unauthorised overdraft they had closed my account and that I must return all my cheque books and cards or else THEY would issue court proceedings, I did this the same day, cutting up the card on return, the predicament which I discussed on the chat forum was that as a lot of ppl seem to be getting gogw at the defence stage and mine is due on the 16th May, how will I know if I have been offered one so that I can reject it, or accept it in part payment, and do they give you a time to accept or does it become full and final if not acknowleged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You gotta just wait for them to give you GOGW. As for your bundle, iwould wait till you get your directions as you may not have to compile one. You will have at least a month until the hearing which should be plenty time to prepare. And as for them taking your overdraft and cards etc, They are breaking their so called codes because in a leaflet they provided me with following my LBA it said that they would give 1 months notice before doing anything like this. Talk about 2 faced!. I don't even bank with Abbey and i hate them. Almost as much as the halifax but thats because of their crappy adverts which i have to turn off!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

iwould wait till you get your directions as you may not have to compile one.

 

Have to agree I held off starting mine until I got the directions back from the judge, and today I have just found out that he has struck Abbey's defence out so I have entered judgement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...