Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I applied to the Court to act as litigation friend has my son is Severely Mentally Impaired and sent the proof they requested from his GP so I thought this might have been accepted without a hearing. I cannot believe the claimant is still convinced my son was the driver.
    • I had to call an ambulance for my wife, but one of the paramedics was not happy, about the condition of our house, as it's cluttered. And he  would only see to my wife, on the ambulance itself. After diagnosis they took my wife to hospital. My wife was ill for a few months, and received help from the district nurses. We then got a call from a social worker, who wanted to visit us, and discuss ways to make my wife more comfortable. When I asked for more details, she became vague, but could give us a phone number, if she visited. I politely declined her offer, as I was coping, along with my daughter in caring for my wife. Then a letter arrived from another social worker, saying similar things, to the first. I didn't bother to reply. Another letter has just turned up, from the social services legal department, which doesn't say anything specific, but refers to the other social workers trying to visit us. Coming from a legal department, has badly upset my wife, who's recovery was on going, and she now fears that someone will be coming to the house, to do whatever. Do we have to respond, or take notice of these people. Also we recently had a fire prevention officer come and fit, smoke and heat detectors. He didn't voice any concerns with the conditions at the property. Worried, Paul.
    • By not sticking to the deadline which you set you have lost credibility. Your letter of claim becomes one of hundreds of others which they receive and which they put in the bin because they think that you are just bluffing.  
    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Beware Cornhill Direct "Plain English" policies


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6117 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just made a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service about Cornhill Direct's Buildings Insurance Policy, and am interested to know if anyone else has experienced similar problems.

 

Cornhill Direct makes a big deal out of the fact that their policy documents are written in "plain english" and not legal gobbledegook. On the second page of my Buildings Insurance Policy there is a prominent logo showing it has been approved for "Clarity" by the Plain English Campaign, and on page 4 the company reassuringly explains that "To help you throughout this policy we have printed what is not covered in coloured boxes". On the face of it the document does indeed seem a model of clarity, and after reading it and studying the handy coloured boxes you think you know exactly what cover the company is providing.

 

Recently I suffered a sudden loss of water from my central heating system. Investigation by a plumber has established that there is a leak somewhere under the floor of the Family Room. The pipes that feed the radiators in this room run beneath a sand and cement screed topped with marble tiles, and since there is no dampness showing on the surface, much damage to the floor may occur in the process of finding the exact position of the leak. In fact depending on how much of the floor has to be excavated, the repair cost could run to thousands of pounds.

 

It is of course to cover the risk of this kind of unforeseen disaster that I spend hundreds of pounds on insurance premiums every year. On receiving the bad news I checked my policy and found that, sure enough, cover is supposedly provided for "damage to buildings caused by...water leaking or overflowing from water tanks, apparatus or pipes or fixed heating installations".

 

So I approached Cornhill with my claim; only to have it rejected out of hand on the grounds that I was not covered in respect of any work to locate the leak or repair the damage caused by such work. The only compensation the company might provide is for the cost of physically repairing the burst pipe -- something that will take all of about ten minutes once the problem area is exposed and will account for a tiny fraction of the cost!

 

It appears that the nub of the matter is the meaning of the words "caused by" in the policy document. Cornhill are choosing to apply a limited and legalistic interpretation of the words, whereas everybody with whom I have discussed the policy takes the view that although the excavation and repair of the floor will not have been literally caused by the water bursting from the pipe, this work is only necessary because of the leak, and therefore has effectively been "caused by" the leak. This view is supported by the fact that collateral damage resulting from the repair of a burst pipe is not one of the many items in the coloured boxes which the policy document identifies as not being covered.

 

It seems to me that Cornhill Direct is trying to have its cake and eat it too. It wants the public to think of it as a consumer-friendly organisation that spells out all its obligations in plain english, yet, when faced with a possible claim it tries to hide behind weaselly lawyers' definitions. In my view, "plain english" that actually misleads is more harmful than gobbledegook.

 

My complaint to the Financial Ombudsman requests that Cornhill be obliged either to honour my claim, or rewrite its policy documents making the limitations of cover much clearer to potential policy holders. Until the FOS makes an adjudication (it takes months, apparently), Cornhill policyholders and potential policyholders should take heed that they do not have the cover they might expect from reading the policy. Additional cover to protect them from the risk of collateral damage associated with an insured event might therefore be a wise investment. Or better still, perhaps, check out the cover provided by other companies.

 

Your comments please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would appear your policy does not cover 'Trace and Access' which is still very common on household policies.

 

Query this and ask specifically if your policy covers Trace and Access. If not ask them where in the policy does it state that this cover is excluded and why (if excluded) were you not told of this at inception.

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a very common misconception, and cause a lot of arguments between Insurers and policyholders.

 

Unless you have trace and access cover, which is being phased out by a lot of Insurers, you will not be covered.

 

The rule of thumb is if its wet, its covered. As your floor has not been damaged by an escape of water you will not be covered.

 

By the way, to add further misery, I would be suprised if the Insurers would cover the damage to the pipe. Your policy should provide cover for accidental damage to underground pipes - Unless you have been doing DIY in the area, it is highly unlikely it has been accidentally damaged, more like corroded

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Xchris and Craigwalton for your input. I'm sure you're correct in saying that Cornhill Direct's position is that the policy does not include "Trace and Access" cover. My point is that the wording of the policy (which is presented as a model of clarity) suggests that it is provided. If as Xchris says this cover is commonly included with Buildings policies, it makes Cornhill's failure to list it as one of the events for which cover is not provided under my policy all the heinous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that this will help but the Allianz Cornhill products sold through brokers include trace and access cover as standard up to £5000.

 

Unfortunately it is common for many Direct Insurers to strip out cover on a policy to keep premiums low and then say come to us as brokers are expensive when the broker is usually providing better cover and all round policies.

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the update XRChris. I'd like to look at a Cornhill Allianz broker policy to see how it compares with the Cornhill Direct one. Can you suggest how I might get hold of one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are several of them but here are links to 2 of them >

 

http://www.allianzcornhill.co.uk/personal/assets/PDF/ACPER154.pdf See part 16 on page 9 of the policy booklet (adobe acrobat counts it as page 11).

 

and

 

http://www.allianzcornhill.co.uk/personal/assets/PDF/ACPER104.pdf This one is section 15 also on page 9 of the policy booklet.

 

Both clearly show Trace and access cover unlike your policy which does not seem to show it at all.

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

As a result of my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman, Cornhill Direct have now paid my claim in full. Additionally they have (quite by coincidence of course) decided to include Trace and Access cover in all Buildings Insurance policies when they are renewed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...