Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

*** Charges=£11,211.35 (inc 8% int) what shall I do ? ***


agile
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6281 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Started back in August 2006, here's whats happend so far...................

 

1) Sent of for Statements

----------------------------------

I sent off for my statements from natwest in August 2006. Worked out all the charges over the last 6 years & they came to a staggering, I then entered the charges into the spreadsheet template (also workin out the interest)

 

The figures are as follows

 

Charges (up to Sept 2006) - £9842.66

8% Interest 1368.69

 

Total=£11,211.35

 

 

 

2) Sent off Letter to Natwest asking for refund of charges

------------------------------------------------------------

 

I then sent off the 1st letter along with the spreadsheet to my branch of natwest asking for a refund. I got an extremely low offer offer of £638! & I had to bank elsewhere.

 

 

3) Sent off Letter Before Action

------------------------------------

 

I then sent off a 2nd letter (LBA) to Natwest again along with the spreadsheet claiming that I would take them to court. This time there response was even more laughable £518, even less than the 1st offer!!!

 

 

4)Applied for Court Action

-----------------------

 

I then filled in the Money Claim On-Line (MCOL) Particulars of Claim & paid my £250 fee.

 

If since checked my online claim &

 

You are unable to take any further action online on this claim & i got this msg when I looged in.....

 

The Defendant disputes the whole amount you have claimed. Your claim cannot proceed online and will be transferred to the appropriate court for continuation. You will receive confirmation to where the claim has been transferred to shortly

 

 

 

5) The Case then got moved from Northampton to Manchester

 

 

This week i recieved a letter from Manchester county court in the post. Genral Form of Judgement or order.

 

The letter is as follows:-

Before DISTRICT JUDGE JONES sitting at Manchester County Court, Courts of Justice, Crown Sq, Manchester, M60 9DJ.

 

Upon the courts own motion. The court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you must make an application to have set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of recieving it.

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT unless the claiment do by 16th Febuary 2007 file his allocation questionaire, the action shall stand struck out.

 

 

 

I did received a copy of he defence and allocation q from the court, I did fill the allocation questionaire in & returned it on the 5th Febuary, also the solicitors working for natwest asked for a copy of the spreadsheet which I sent to them.

 

A few weeks went by & I didn’t received any letters from the courts etc. I rang the courts up & they said that my case had been struck out as they didn’t receive the paperwork in time, I did explain to them that I sent it 11 days before it was requested, but they never received it. The courts then said I had to pay £35 & fill in a N244 Form to reapply, which Im a bit annoyed by I just want it sorted.

 

 

Q1) I’ve since worked out that since October 2006 I have racked up even more charges a further £1377:-( Shall I start all over again so that I can include these charges ?? The total wud then be over £12,500k

 

Q2) Since my charges are over £5k, What is the likelihood that I will have to pay further legal fees?? Do small claims only go upto 5K, is this why it has been moved from Northamton to Manchester? Im just worried that this case is going to get a bit out of hand with regards to paying court costs ? I’ve already paid the £250 when I filled in the Money Claim On-Line form, do u think that i will have to shell out more money on court costs.

 

Thanks in Advance

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

1) No, those charges can be left for claim 2

2) unlikely do you live in Manchester because claims usually get moved from Nothampton(the processing part of online claiming) to you local court. The only mistake you made was not either visiting the court in person or sending the documents recorded delivery

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep finish the one claim youve started get your money,, then start on em again for the new charges, but for the second lot, I suggest, that once you get paid out on first claim, you ring Mr. Higleys department and tell him new charges and that you intend to claim again, blah blah blah, and would they consider settling up before it goes to court again. Amazing, some people have done that and had charges refunded instantly once they won once. So you might not even have to go through the process a second time. Once they have seen you are true to your word the first time, they have been know to refund charges thereafter with a simple phone call. Best of luck. Fendy xxxx That would be nice wouldnt it. One phone call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input Fendy, yeah it wud be nice if was as simple as 1 phone call :-). Whos Mr. Higley? is it just an random name that works at the natwest you have made up ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr. Higley is the head of customer relations at Borehamwood address where all your requests for repayment have to go to and where you replies will come from. Hes the head honcho at customer relations department. Expect your replies from him. But hes gonna be mighty busy at the mo. Fendy xxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Fendy I dont suppose u have an other contact details for mr Higley, as ive only ever sent letters to my branch at Natwest & the courts. it will save me searching for them when i come to do my 2nd claim. So does he work for the courts ? or customer relations at Natwest ? I bet he hates his job at the moment lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, I bet hes not too much of a happy bunny at the moment with claims flooding in and the Whistleblower thing last night wont be helping his work at the mo either. Yeah, his address to send letters for claims about repayment of charges to is:

 

Mr. S. Higley

NatWest Customer Relations

225 Shenley Road

Borehamwood

Hertfordshire

WD6 1BR

 

OR YOU COULD ALWAYS E MAIL: E mail address for customer relations is:

 

[email protected]

 

I do both, but only cos I like to be a nuisance to them. I e mail my letters first them pop in post recorded, double whammy sort of thing, they cant ever deny having gotten them then.

 

Im horrible arent I. Poor man, he must be crushed under the mountain of claims at the mo.

 

Fendy xxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Thanks once again for you quick responce, you have been very helpful. I know have more confidence that I will actually get somewhere with the bank now. I'll let u know how it goes :-) Mr Higley going to wish he never took the Job in the 1st place hehe

 

Yeah its that whistleblower program that got me so extemely annoyed to get my case sorted again I was horrified to see the attitude of the banks staff gloating how a charge which cost the bank maybe £1-£2 is turned into a £35 charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sad fact of life. Theyre all as bad as each other for the charges situation. But with the help and support of everybody on here you can and will get what is rightfully yours back. Just follow the process, step by step and you will get your money. Just read up as much as you can on the process to help you along the way. But I strongly believe yours will be one that is settled quickly because its not an extortionate amount. A lot I know, but there are people on here goes for thousands. Me being one of em, but Ive filed at court now, so just waiting for their solicitors defence to come through. But not daunted in the slightest, Im quite relishing the fight. Lol. All the best. Keep posting so we can see how you are doing. Fendy xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Agile...

 

Seems you are the same stage as me. My AQ and the reply to their defence went in last week. NW haven't yet sent in theirs so they are 5 days late..

 

Have a read here.. there might be some clues for you as to what happens next.. If you need any help with any wording let me know...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/56352-josa-natwest-6-years.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whichever way you havent cocked up, but you really should only put either the contractual or the overdraft interest if you used the advanced spreadsheet that works out the overdraft interest. If the 8% one, you should have left it out but its not the end of the world. All it means is if they come back to you and offer charges alone, you have to accept it. You cant then push for the 8% because a judge would not look favourably upon that. Which was it ??? Fendy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

See what comes back. I may be totally wrong here, but i think owing to the amount you are claiming they will ignore you and force you into issuing court proceedings. Don't worry to much, because these are their normal scare tactics. To make you either give in or accept a lower offer. Their is loads of support and advice availble to help you at every stage if needed. Good luck

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...