Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hsbc


chipper99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5823 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 302
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all.

 

I have done all the paperwork and decided to launch my claim in person at court rather than MCOL. I am claiming £2485 in total, including sat. interest. So tomorrow its a trip to court to get it sorted.

 

Fingers crossed!!!

 

Chipper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I got the acknowledgement today saying that HSBC intend to defend all of the claim and the address for DG but no contact name. If im right, I think I now send them a copy of the POC and schedule of charges and interest??? Can anyone confirm this? Also do I add the interest on the new schedule up to todays date?

Also there is no contact name but a reference of KVE / RT. I think I recall on a thread that this refers to a couple of solicitors.

Now Im really getting excited. I dont understand why they do this when it will just cost them more money.

 

Cheers, Darren.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This would be fine.

 

 

 

Date

 

DG Solicitors

xxxx

xxxx

xxxx

 

RE: Claim number xxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxx -vs- HSBC Bank, PLC

 

Dear Kate Eaves and Rachel Thomlinson

 

Please find enclosed a copy of my Schedule of Charges to be attached to my claim.

 

Please note that the sum I am seeking is xxxx.xx (£xxxx.xx charges, xxx.xx 8% interest and £120.00 court fee) plus xx pence per day from the date claimed until this is resolved.

 

Sincerely

 

 

xxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

One other thing. How will the decision this week in favour of Lloyds TSB affect claims going through the system now? I only just heard about it as I was away for a few days last week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One other thing. How will the decision this week in favour of Lloyds TSB affect claims going through the system now? I only just heard about it as I was away for a few days last week.

 

Hi, Basically CAG are saying 'business as usual' except to make double sure you have all the correct info,IE dotting the t's & crossing the eyes :p and the one thing that everybody is busy with at the moment that incudes ripping up carpets, having trips to the loft and garden sheds, all looking for old T & Cs ( terms and conditions) as it seems this is where the case fell apart as the judge only read the current T & C's online which have all changed last couple years, to cover up the unlawfull penalties. So if you have any .................. dig em up.

Read the threads, theres loads on it and at first it seemed bad but when you read up on it, but it may be a good thing as its making us tighten up on our claims.

Try & find a copy of the T & C's from when you opened your account or as far back as you can find.

Do search on T & C for hsbc & follow threads, somebody, somewhere has copies

Good luck

CM

Templates Library

 

GE Capital Won

Capital 0ne Won

Northern rock Claim stayed working on negotiation

HSBC personal claim 1 ''WON''.

£1800 plus full stat interest plus costs.

Claim started 14/02/07 offer 3/07/07

 

Next:Coming soon to a thread near you! :)

HSBC personal Part 2 'return of the Celicaman'

HSBC business 1 ' my empire strikes back' N1 claim POC in progress after usual offensive offer from bank

HSBC business 2 'attack of the Celicaman'

HSBC business claim 3 'bank account menace'

HSBC business 4 'Revenge of the CAG Member' the final insult ....................... 'Maybe'

Link to post
Share on other sites

As with so many things in life the unexpected jumps up and bites your bum.

The Lloyds result was the culmination of a series of unrelated events being put together by a totally peed off District Judge trying to do his job for once instead of sitting waiting for letters saying claims have been settled.

Firstly its inadmissible as evidence because its a small claims court.

Secondly if it was admissible it would be a very brave solicitor who used it without the result of the appeal which will have all of the evidence available.

As Celica says business as usual.

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Pete,

It left me twitching a little when I heard about it and did some reading. One thing I dont understand is how the judge ruled in their favour when no defence turned up. Surely that goes against the small claims system.

 

Darren.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you mean, "court bundle"? Ive sent off a polite letter to D&G along with a schedule of charges and up to date schedule of interest. So waiting for their next move. At the minute Im reading up on the legislation as much as I can with work and all. Thanks for your continued support.

 

Darren.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all.

 

I have received a letter from HSBC regarding my claim for £2625, saying that all the charges they made were legit fees as set out in theier price list. They go on to offer me a settlement sum of £2004.30 with no admission of liability. Any advice????

 

My gut instinct is to refuse it as the amount of the charges alone are £2227.00 and then there is the £120.00 I paid for the court claim. They have therefore offered me less than the charges they took from me. No mention of how they arrived at this figure or why there charges ranged from £25 to £125 each time. So what do you all think.

 

Chipper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Chipper, as with all offers only you can decide if you should accept it or not. I suspect the offer you have has come from Uncle Colin's HSBC Leeds department which is why it wont include for any court fees or statutory interest.

The bottom line here is if you need the money accept the offer, if you can afford to wait a little you will get much more from DG Solicitors who will include your court fees and your 8% statutory interest.

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...