Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
    • totally immaterial. time to now start reading up. Programmable Search Engine (google.com) Clickme^^^ do not miss your defence filing date no matter what dx  
    • Programmable Search Engine CSE.GOOGLE.COM clickme^^
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Credit AGREEMENT -or- APPLICATION? RBS Advantage Card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4248 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Look at it again Z then say 'Doh!'

 

doh...(humble - why blank that?? I missed it)

 

but as you said - a serious amount missing and it is an application form....

 

Z

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 650
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i have received a few application forms like this which the DCA state is their compliance of the 'executed agreement'.

 

so, is it or not?

It isn't an enforceable agreement, that is for sure. It does contain the signatures of both parties, but a number of the prescribed terms are missing. A judge cannot enforce this 'agreement'. It is an application form, but an executed one (if that makes sense). It isn't an agreement (IMO)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't an enforceable agreement, that is for sure. It does contain the signatures of both parties, but a number of the prescribed terms are missing. A judge cannot enforce this 'agreement'. It is an application form, but an executed one (if that makes sense). It isn't an agreement (IMO)

 

agreed LOL

 

Write back to each thanking them kindly for the copy of the precontractual application and asking if they would mind awfully if they could now supply the subsequent agreement,

 

Z

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Humbleman

 

If there are no terms and conditions, and there isn't a signed statement of account, they haven't complied with the s77/8 request. You can either tell them of this and wait for them to send the statement and/or the T&C's, or you could go the whole hog and state as Z is advocating, that you didn't ask for the application form but wanted the actual agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its an application form...

 

also where exactly are the financial prescribed terms... their signature..

 

gotta go

 

Z

 

Hi

 

It doesn't matter what they want to call this document, it is still totally, completely and utterly unenforceable as there are no terms whatsoever, let alone the prescribed terms that MUST be in the signature document of a regulated agreement!

 

BUT - as always I strongly recommend writing again and requesting that they send a copy of the actual regulated agreement - just in case they have one!! :eek:

 

Regards, Pam

  • Haha 1

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maria

 

I have also seen this. Don't go wasting the £30 they are charging for a report on your agreement though! It is easy enough to show why your particular agreement is unenforceable by simply reading the CCA's regulations.

 

I will get back to you this evening about wording for a letter unless Dave or anyone else does it first, and also about the PPI/Medicare issue.

 

Regards, Pam

 

Hello Pam,

 

 

Thank you...see you are still awake as well.i am trying to read as many information as possible....to prepare myself and get ready for a big argument...if it would be one:)))

 

Will wait for your respond re: agreement letter wording, PPI and Medicare:)))))

 

Kind regards,

 

Maria

Carphone Warehouse WON £195.00

Welcome Finance in Court. N244 accepted.

Barclaycard WON with contractual, PPI and charges for time spent and letters sent

Halifax solo, switch, Credit Classic, Halifax one Itsme Vs Halifax 2 accounts

Creation Finance Prelim received offer of £79.88.... Itsme VS Creation Finance

Vodafone overcharged Vodafon.. anything that could be done?

 

U know where the scales r:)))))

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Will wait for your respond re: agreement letter wording, PPI and Medicare:)))))

 

 

Hi Maria

 

I haven't forgotten about you but I need a clear head to think about this and have been busy with my 'other life' this evening! :)

 

Will get back to you tomorrow - promise!

 

Regards, Pam

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for the 'click' Lantana - much appreciated! :)

 

Regards, Pam

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone...

 

I decided that my document was definetley an application and have written to them stating such.......see below

 

2 April 2007

Morgan Stanley Bank Intl. Ltd.

 

Dear Sirs

Ref account **************

 

With regard to the documents that you sent me in relation to my request for information under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, I am still waiting for the signed executed agreement. You seem to have sent me an application form and a somewhat recent copy of your terms and conditions and a very recent copy of an agreement form unsigned by anyone. I’m sure this must be an oversight, so I will ask you again for the proper documents.

I draw your attention to section 61 of the consumer credit act 1974 (an excerpt enclosed for your perusal) in that

“(1) A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner.”

Be also advised that your statutory time period has elapsed and YOU are now in default and very shortly you will have committed a criminal offence. As you are now in default NO further action can be taken on this account until such a time as the original SIGNED EXECUTED documents are made available to me.

This account is still in dispute and I still forbid the passing of any data to third parties, if any data has been processed illegally since my last request I shall take appropriate action.

Further if you cannot supply the proper documents and you have entered any defaults against my name I require that you remove them immediately.

I shall be carefully considering my options and next actions.

I await your response.

 

lets see if that rattles their cage.... :-)

 

also on a further note regarding agreements have a GOOD read of the doc at this link. its the OFT guidelines for credit agreements. its the 2004 version though. the 1983 version must exist somewhere.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_credit/oft786a.pdf

 

IT MAKES INTERESTING READING :-)

 

Dave

  • Haha 1

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone...

 

I decided that my document was definetley an application and have written to them stating such.......see below

 

2 April 2007

Morgan Stanley Bank Intl. Ltd.

 

Dear Sirs

Ref account **************

 

With regard to the documents that you sent me in relation to my request for information under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, I am still waiting for the signed executed agreement. You seem to have sent me an application form and a somewhat recent copy of your terms and conditions and a very recent copy of an agreement form unsigned by anyone. I’m sure this must be an oversight, so I will ask you again for the proper documents.

I draw your attention to section 61 of the consumer credit act 1974 (an excerpt enclosed for your perusal) in that

“(1) A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner.”

Be also advised that your statutory time period has elapsed and YOU are now in default and very shortly you will have committed a criminal offence. As you are now in default NO further action can be taken on this account until such a time as the original SIGNED EXECUTED documents are made available to me.

This account is still in dispute and I still forbid the passing of any data to third parties, if any data has been processed illegally since my last request I shall take appropriate action.

Further if you cannot supply the proper documents and you have entered any defaults against my name I require that you remove them immediately.

I shall be carefully considering my options and next actions.

I await your response.

 

lets see if that rattles their cage.... :-)

 

also on a further note regarding agreements have a GOOD read of the doc at this link. its the OFT guidelines for credit agreements. its the 2004 version though. the 1983 version must exist somewhere.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_credit/oft786a.pdf

 

IT MAKES INTERESTING READING :-)

 

Dave

Hi, what a great letter, I will use it if you dont mind to send to NCO and the oh so dreadful Monument, regards

rinkydinkydoo:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

no probs.....I'm having a go at monument as well....they are now in default too :-)

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rinky

 

they havent upset me as yet.......but Ive just noticed that they have been putting on a "payment break" charge of about £25. this is something I never agreed to.

 

So Ive stopped the dd's and sent them a cca request. they have been in default since 28 mar. the dd is supposed to come out on the 12th so i'll wait until they start calling me.

 

i think that they are going to be sorry that they did it...:-)

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone:))))

Great letter Dave:))

I have received a copy of WF defence..a bit suprised...reading through it...Need a deep breath....and support......

 

 

regards,

 

 

Maria

Carphone Warehouse WON £195.00

Welcome Finance in Court. N244 accepted.

Barclaycard WON with contractual, PPI and charges for time spent and letters sent

Halifax solo, switch, Credit Classic, Halifax one Itsme Vs Halifax 2 accounts

Creation Finance Prelim received offer of £79.88.... Itsme VS Creation Finance

Vodafone overcharged Vodafon.. anything that could be done?

 

U know where the scales r:)))))

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you got your scanner working yet... if you have email me a copy and let pam have a look at it too......she seems a whiz with these things and I bow to her superior knowledge

 

take that deep breath

stay calm

and go for them

 

best wishes

 

dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will send you a Pam a copy..and also a copy of SOC.....already had a cold shower:))))doesn't help...................

Carphone Warehouse WON £195.00

Welcome Finance in Court. N244 accepted.

Barclaycard WON with contractual, PPI and charges for time spent and letters sent

Halifax solo, switch, Credit Classic, Halifax one Itsme Vs Halifax 2 accounts

Creation Finance Prelim received offer of £79.88.... Itsme VS Creation Finance

Vodafone overcharged Vodafon.. anything that could be done?

 

U know where the scales r:)))))

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you are now in default NO further action can be taken on this account until such a time as the original SIGNED EXECUTED documents are made available to me.

 

HI Dave

 

Good letter but remember that for a 'copy' agreement sent under this and other sections of the Act, the creditor may omit the signatures and the name/address of the debtor. Strange, but true!

 

But, if they want to sue you, they will need to show the signatures as well so IMO they might as well not 'omit' them from they copy they send.

 

Regards, Pam

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that pam

 

we'll see how it goes......... I'll keep you lot posted

Have you seen itsme's Bulls**t reply from welcome? not quite had chance to go over it properly yet. It suprises me that they are taking this one that far.....considering the agreement status in the first place. and I noticed a claim for costs???? (500) if it goes through the small claims court they wont get any !!! (even if they win, which they probably wont)

 

dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

great letter!

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

What have WF said in their letter? Please tell me someone.... PM me for an email address to send the letter to, many thanks

hello M55dlc, its a defence letter in which they are requesting "not more than £500" if they win...I can email it to you need all the help and advise as i can get....................and Dave and Pam are looking through this claim now....My thread is http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/ppi/58571-itsme-welcome-finance.html.

 

 

 

Dave, i also do not think they realise that there is a fundamental mistakes in the agreement.....so i will let them know:))))

 

Regards,

 

Maria

Carphone Warehouse WON £195.00

Welcome Finance in Court. N244 accepted.

Barclaycard WON with contractual, PPI and charges for time spent and letters sent

Halifax solo, switch, Credit Classic, Halifax one Itsme Vs Halifax 2 accounts

Creation Finance Prelim received offer of £79.88.... Itsme VS Creation Finance

Vodafone overcharged Vodafon.. anything that could be done?

 

U know where the scales r:)))))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone!

 

Hi Itsme my fellow welcome fighter... we seem to be on all the same threads!

 

Dave / Pam... thought i'd jump on Itsme's bandwagon and see if i can get you guys onside as i am awaiting Welcomes defence... due through any day now. Dave, you seem to know a bit about Welcomes agreements! Well they have admitted to me that they do not have a signed agreement for either of my HP agreements and they wiped the last remaining amount of the debt. Yet i have issued a claim at court (for charges etc) and they have given notice of intent to defend. Which i find laughable seeing as they have no proof that i ever signed an agreement in the first place. If you wish to have a read of the defence when it comes through your more than "Welcome" (pardon the pun!)

£914.00 unfair bank charges recovered from NatWest after 1st letter :)

 

£255.00 unfair bank charges recovered from RBS after 1st letter :)

 

Welcome Finance cannot supply original agreement, N1 issued for charges, PPI & interest total over £3k :cool:

 

Woolwich 2 defaults removed, 1 ccj removed. My credit file is now clean :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

This takes a bit of thinkiing about it is something that has come up before.

If you are claiming unfair penalty charges then you would have had an account,but you have just shown that one never existed. I would be interested to see hear if their defense picked up on this.

 

Regards

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...