Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i see you are posting this all over the internet too. here you say it was returned by the post office UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please? WWW.FTLA.UK UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please?  
    • I see what you mean. I will wait till the 8 weeks is up and then take it up with FOS. Before I do will be on with some more details on the SAR. Thank you once again. 
    • Tagging @stu007 who's great with this. You should have at least 2 months notice with a Section 21 notice (Which Form 6A is used) For now, scan, redact and upload anything you think will be useful    
    • That's fine.  The important thing is to show Kev you're trouble and so best to drop you like a hot potato. Invest in a 2nd class stamp tomorrow - all Kev is worth - and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Do not under any circumstances plead guilty until we know what we are dealing with. It's a sure way to 9 points. The tried and tested way to handle this is to plead not guilty to both charges and offer to plead guilty to speeding provided the "Fail to give information" charge is dropped. But I am concerned about this "ticket refused" sticker. I've never heard of this before. A "ticket" is not a term used in connection with speeding offences. There seems a distinct possibility that your response was received by the police but one thing worries me: I've never heard of a sticker being placed on a response and it being returned "Return to Sender". t's just not what ticket offices do. If you could post a picture of this document and the sticker it might help.  If you can show the response was received you may have a defence to the "Fail to Provide" charge (provided you completed your response properly). If the police are saying you did not respond they cannot succeed with a speeding charge (as they have no evidence you were driving). But if you did not respond, who put the sticker on the document and sent it back yo you?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

kidneybeaner vs Abbey


kidneybeaner
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6108 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't know whether there are any right or wrong answers...

 

I think if it's a cheque and you can do without it send it back telling them that you won't accept anything except FULL payment of the sum owed.

 

However, in reality you probably need some of the money for the next step, so, if you 're going to cash it, write to them and make sure that they know that you reject it as full and final and only accept it as a partial payment. Maybe you could put a deadline in the letter for a response from them and say otherwise you will deem no reply as acceptance of the cheque being partial payment, then cash it!

 

Only my opinion but I could see you were struggling! Maybe someone else will be along soon or you could ask in the chat room or pm a mod!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all,

 

Just an update - I received Abbey's defence about two weeks ago and yesterday I received my allocation questionnaire from the court which I'm going to complete this weekend and send it back with my £100 cheque - that's a point, can I add this charge to my court costs?

 

Anyhoo, just trundling along and will have a look when I get back from Glastonbury!

 

Kidneybeaner:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The AQ fee is refundable along with your other court costs.At this stage why not try ringing or emailing today with your attempt to settle- they could save over 100pounds etc.it might save you some work.good luck and have a great time at glastonbury!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So I'm handing in my AQ today - there is also a form attached to it called a mediation scheme reply form which basically is trying to get both parties to dettle before going to court. It says I have to fill it in either way - only thing is if I do chose to mediate it looks like I have to shell out another £100......

 

Has anybody else gone down this route and what would people say is the best thing to do?

 

kidneybeaner

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you obviusly didnt want to settle for any less than the full amount so i think you have to be firm.Mediation will delay things further, the same as requesting a stay, which abbey will almost certainly do.See the thread, Abbey abuse Orders, putting the pressure on by gary H and also New strategy for AQ and the new strat CPRpart 18, do a search cos I dont know how to post links.Have a look at my thread if you like, im using most of these tactics.(petcat v Abbey)Ultimately its up to you but keep reading others threads;knowledge is power.

Yes i agree the who are fantastic, didnt realise they were there.Mind you im an old fart now not been since 1990/1991?Going to the cornbury festival soon, taking my six year old cant wait.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I've got a hearing date, in the first week of September (Abbey are defending in full, the gits). I have to file my court bundle in the next couple of weeks and am having a bit of a panic trying to get it all in order and to the court before I go on holiday (yes, I am still going on my hols even though I'm broke)

 

Anyone else compiling their court bundle at the moment and want to share some gems? I know that it is pretty straightforwardish - it's just when you're sat in among reams of paper trying to get everything straight in your head it can seem a bit daunting!

 

Hope all are well.

kidneybeaner

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi have sent mine off couple of days ago and got court date for 14.9

 

I found it useful to do spreadsheet of 'intended contents' from list with statement of evidence template and then find them, print off and add amount of pages to my spreadsheet as I went along.

 

I couldn't get t and c so didn't include in the end.

 

It took me ages, really, hours and hours to sort out so I gave myself a limit of an hour an evening to work on it so I didn't go mad.

 

I intend to negotiate via letter next week now I have sent it off but am prepared to go to court.

 

Keep working Frankey

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hubby has same Hereford court date as you - 2pm. Getting him to ring them Monday morning to find out if HSBC are asking for case to be stayed. Bundle date is 13th Aug. He's convinced he's going to mess it up.:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey JCP, thanks for your message. I've been on holiday for the last ten days and whilst I was away Abbey sent me a letter saying that due to the test case going through they were asking all county courts for a stay on all claims including mine.

 

As with all things in life I've left it to the last minute and am handing in my court bundle tomorrow (the deadline day....) and will ask the peeps at the court whether the stay has been confirmed. Has your hubbys been put on hold?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget that just because shAbbey have requested a stay doesnt mean that it will necessarily be granted, so go ahead and comply with deadlines (although the court will probably stay the claim anyway!) and when shAbbey fail to comply still write to the court and ask for their defence to be struck out

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyhoo I handed in my court bundle and spoke to a dude in Hereford Court Office who said that all these claims were still going through in Hford and that no stays were being approved.

 

He suggested that if you have a court date it would be less likely that a stay would occur, I've now got everything crossed that it doesn't get put on hold - I need the cash!!!!

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...