Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Parents and teens alike are trading in their smartphones for "dumber" models to help stay offline.View the full article
    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
    • Victims as far afield as Singapore, Peru and the United Arab Emirates fell prey to their online scams.View the full article
    • Rights groups warn of state paranoia as experts on hypersonics, the science behind ultrafast missiles, have been jailed.View the full article
    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

monkey_uk -v- Halifax (Bank accounts and credit card)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6158 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Claim for bank account lodged via MCOL - total claimed £2818.84 + £120 fee

 

Let the fun begin!

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Claim for visa lodged via MCOL - total claimed ££78.29 + £50

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers moneyhelp!

 

Claim has been OFFICIALLY issued today 18/06/07

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Both claims acknowledged 03/07/07. Not what I wanted to hear, but no big deal, onwards and upwards!

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers sal, here's hoping hey!

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noticed yesterday that the £581 wasn't in my account anymore. It'd not been just debited from my account, the transaction had totally disappeared. Luckily I pre-empted this and took a screenshot of my online statement with it showing!

 

Spoke to my contact there yesterday and she said it'd been taken out as I was only accepting it as part settlement.

 

 

It is precisely for that reason that as soon as my *goodwill* gesture money goes in - I'm withdrawing it and depositing it in my Standard Life a/c!

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Acknowledgement for both claims received 07/07/07.

 

Hfx intend to defend the whole of both claims.

  • Haha 1

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers, hoping it's sorted soon, but I'm in for as long as it takes, I'm getting my money.

 

I only wish I'd have done this in spring last year when my FD claim was settled, like I'd told myself, but I was lazy and kept putting it off, then I went on holiday and bought a house so only just got round to it really.

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, though I'm expecting an arguement over the contractual interest issue!

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like they're at it again;

 

£412.12 and £1162.00 has been credited to my acount as "cash" today.

 

I've not had a letter or anything about this.

 

Grrrrrr!

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like they're at it again;

 

£441.12 and £1162.00 has been credited to my acount as "cash" today.

 

I've not had a letter or anything about this.

 

Grrrrrr!

 

Ok, £1162 is EXACTLY the amount of the charges on my bank 2 accounts which is one claim (note: they've not paid interest, not even at 8%).

 

No idea where the £441.12 is from though!

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll wait and see I think.

 

They have, by my reckoning, up until the 21st to settle in full or enter a defence.

 

It just annoys me SOOOO much that they act like this!

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear monkey_uk,

 

Yourself -v- Halifax PLC

Claim No XXXXXXX

Roll No X/XXXXX-X and X/XXXXX-X

 

I have received and have been dealing with the proceedings, which you have issued against Halifax plc in the Northampton County Court.

 

Your claim relates to bank charges debited to your bank account. These charges were debited to your account in accordance with the account terms and conditions, which you agreed to accept, and by which you are bound.

 

I have returned the form of Acknowledgment of Service to the Northampton County Court indicating that Halifax intends to defend your claim. However, on a purely commercial basis, it will cost Halifax money to defend your claim in terms of the legal cost that will be incurred. It is unlikely that Halifax will be able to recover these costs (even if the bank wins) because your claim will probably be allocated to the small claims track, in which costs and not generally awarded.

 

For this reason, but without admission of liability, Halifax is willing to reimburse £882.00 in respect of the bank charges incurred, together with £216.53 in respect of approximate interest that Halifax has calculated was charged on your account X/XXXXX-X as a result of charges.

 

The Halifax is also willing to reimburse £280.00 in respect of the bank charges incurred, together with £104.59 in respect of approximate interest that Halifax has calculated was charged on your account X/XXXXX-X as a result of the charges. The Halifax will also reimburse £120.00 in the respect of the court fee. This amounts to £1603.12 which will be paid into your account X/XXXXXX-X within the next 5 working days.

 

The Halifax does not consider that you are entitled to the further £1,342.38 that you are claiming. Unless you can provide evidence of this further loss the Halifax will file a defence in respect of this part of your claim.

 

Please note that if an interest payment has been mde, this constitutes "taxable income" and any tax due on this should be dealt with between you and your local tax office.

 

I will write to the Court to let them know that your claim has been settled and would be grateful if you could do the same.

 

We are keen to help you avoid any unneccessary charges in the future by providing you with various ways to keep track of your account. You can do this via telephone banking on 08457 20 30 40, online banking (Halifax Online - UK Banks, Finance, Personal, Telephone & Internet Banking) or by obtaining a mini statement at our cash machines. You can also contact one of our banking advisors at any of our branches.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Richard Temple

Customer Relations Manager

Customer Relations

 

Ok, so now the figures add up, the £441.12 is the 8% interest for both accounts at the day of which they deposited the money (I'm assuming, though I've not checked, as my charges spreadsheets are on my works computer).

 

However, read carefully his wording:

 

together with £216.53 in respect of approximate interest that Halifax has calculated was charged on your account X/XXXXX-X as a result of charges.

 

I've not claimed the interest that I was charged due to the charges, though I'm going to work out what that would equate to, and may well bounce that back to Mr Temple.

 

I'm not considering this over yet, as if the sum of interest they charged me is sizable, I'm going to ask for that back too, though it wasn't in my PoC, not sure how that will affect me. Also, his wording of that part, I'm wondering whether it could be argued that they've not paid the 8% interest due to his incorrect (IMHO) wording in the settlement letter.

 

I must say I'm disappointed with this, very disappointed. I can't even really refuse the settlement as they've already paid the money into my account, which in my opinion, is totally underhand. But, then again, I've not signed anything to state that "I accept the amount as full and final settlement".

 

Hmmm, interesting.

 

 

 

 

No word on the Visa claim yet though.

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone wanna offer any advice/opinions?

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would accept only as a part-payment only. If you start messing with your poc will this not cost you £35 which is non-refundable? The decision is yours to make. It would be best to let the court know you have received a part-payment though, but I bet you knew this already. Seems to me they are trying to force your hand by assuming this is a done deal as I would say the court will need confirmation from you that the matter is closed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, they've paid me the charges + 8% + court fee.

 

I want to only accept it as part payment, but I can't decide whether to.

 

I suppose if I go and withdraw it as cash from a branch and THEN tell them it is only as part payment, they can't exactly take it off me (though I'd not put it past them to debit it from my account and put into into an unauthorised overdraft of nearly 2k!, and charge me for it!).

 

I'm pretty sure they're 28 days are up on the 21st too.

 

Hmmmm.

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've 2 claims running with Hfx, one for Visa charges, and one for charges on two bank accounts (one closed, one open).

 

they've paid money into my account that equates to:

 

all of the charges back, and the £120.00 court fee.

 

They've written to me and told me that they are paying this in "within 5 days" (it was done the same day that they sent the letter to me!), and have also put in the letter that they are also crediting money of what they calculate I was charged in interest on my account as a result of charges (they actually mean they've paid the 8% interest).

 

However, looking at this, they;ve credited for the interest:

 

£216.53 and £104.59

 

Now, using Mindzai;s spreadsheet, changing the date to the 12th of July, which is when they money was credited, the 8% interest due was actually:

 

£216.76 and £104.74.

 

I've even backdated the sheet to 11th July, just to make sure, which would make it:

 

£216.57 and £104.68.

 

Now, they have until the 21st the enter a defence I believe.

 

They are considering the claim settled.

 

My question is, is it reasonable to leave it until the 21st, enter a default (they are unlikely to defence as they believe the figures are correct and that the only difference is the further £1342.38 in CI (28.8%) that I'm claiming.

 

Basically, defaulting them as they've paid me less than £1.00 less than what I'm owed. Is that reasonable?

 

One part of me says no it isn't, but the other part says that they should pay me exactly what they owe me.

 

How likely would I then be to secure a default against them?

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Monkey

 

I couldnt beleive it when I read your thread. It could have been mine.

 

Have a peek at mine if you have the time. overflow v halifax.

 

Ive just been looking at my spready again and Im almost sure they have not pad me for charges going back to 1999. Paid from 2001 only.

 

I too was claiming CI but with them paying money into my account (on the same day they recieved my Rejection letter even though they said i had 7 days to either accept or refuse) I thought that I could only accept the money , mine was nearly £300. short of what I would have hoped to have claimed just with the 8% . I didnt think id win the CI cause Ive used the M&R in my POC as well.

 

They had my rejection letter within their time limit of 7 days but the money remains in my account even after Ive told them to take it back.

 

My claim was deemed served 25th June so their time is up to file defence on 23 July.

 

I keep toying with the idea of ringing them up and telling them they havent paid all charges Ive claimed for , I think they are going by the SoL Act but we all know they cant anymore.

 

Ill be following your thread to see what is going on with you cause its so like my situation.

 

Regards:)

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers overflow, I'm just so stuck what to do.

 

Do I send them a letter tomorrow, sent by special delivery so they get it Tuesday, giving them until the 21st to take the money out of pay the full amount, and then risk losing my claim because of CI, or equally them paying up as a commercial decision, or do I just roll over and accept that they can bully me into accepting the money?

 

What would happen, if I rejected the money, they enter a defence on the basis of CI, and it went into a court room and I lost? Would I be able to file a claim against just for the charges and for 8% interest or would that be it, finito, can't claim nowt back?

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...