Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
    • all DYL's are subject to a TRO. looking at this newish, ever increasing as old ind units have gotten removed, estate, there are only lines on one side, on the other there is a parking lane with traffic calming through which you mention. i seriously doubt your mate has any clue what he is talking about.!! its not a private housing assoc estate. so its a public council owned road. no construction co can just decide to draw their graffiti on a road. the DYLs are certainly there pre 2016 even before his home was built. now ive had a quick look to see if the main access to royal park road has signs. there is no royle park road even on your map but there is a royal barn road which leads to where you are parked royal road has a restriction sign on the pole by the fence of the electric substation jnc with gipsy lane there does not appear to be one leading in from the other end - tesco petrol station
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mule V HSBC **WON**


Mule
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6157 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm hoping someone can give me some guidance :)

 

Here's what I've done so far.

 

First I went through the past 6 years of my current account statements online and noted dates and amounts - I was confused by one of the charges though, it is titled 'unpaid cheque' and is a debit for £115. This seems rather alot to me, so is that a charge from HSBC or is that where a cheque someone has paid me has bounced? Also, I have multiple 'Total charges' of £27.50 each, which I know to be excess overdraft fees, I have one single 'Total charge' of £10 though which I can't identify - can I still reclaim this?

 

When listing the charges should they be written as they are on the statement, i.e. 'Total Charges' or should I write what the charges were for, i.e. 'Excess overdraft'. - If the latter then what should I put for the £10 charge I can't identify?

 

I have now done the prelim letter and included a paragraph on manual intervention, I am now waiting to send this off with the schedule of claim for charges once I know I have everything right.

 

Also - Should this be sent recorded or is standard post ok?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i would send it off anyway (did you look at the link bank charges and what you can claim?) if there is anything that can't be claimed, it will be knocked off at the final settlement offer. take a look at the link and just make sure you are happy with what you are claiming for ok? there's no rush

 

Charges description on statements - Please Read

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post it by recorded delivery then they cannot deny that they have recieved it also they are recieving that many claims if they have recieved it and lost it at their end you have the proof,and good lucky not that you will need it just be patient

Link to post
Share on other sites

st's right... send recorded delivery then it can't be 'lost in the post'. you can then check the royal mail site to see when it's been delivered

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Letter received today

 

Thank you for your letter dated 28 February 2007 concerning bank charges

 

I am looking into the matters you have raised and will contact you with a full response as soon as I have completed my investigations.

 

In the meantime, I enclose a copy of our leaflet which explains how these matters are dealt with. If you do need to contact us, please quote reference number xxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just getting my letter before action ready to send for tomorrow. The first line of the template reads 'I am very disappointed that you have failed to respond to my letter of the xxxx' However as I mentioned in the above post they have responded so what should I write instead? My mind is completely blank.

 

Edit - Never mind, I changed it to 'I am very disappointed that you have failed to respond satisfactorily to my letter of the xxxx'

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could start with "I note reciept of your letter of the xxxx stating that you are investigating my claims. However, as mentioned in my previous letter I have a very clear timescale by which I would like this matter resolved and I am dissapointed that a large corporation such as HSBC is unable to mobilise its resources to meet what I consider to be a very reasonable timeframe."

 

Then continue with the LBA

Guide to claiming back your bank charges

 

Most of your questions can be answered by following this link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their post room must be snowed under lol.

If they follow current trends you should get another letter around about the time you submit your claim apologising for not having finished their investigations and giving you a date, its normally about a month to 6 weeks from the date of the letter.

I think this is just a weak stalling tactic and if you answer it at all I would just use a version of GMMM's wording again.

Mine came 2 days after I had filed my claim with the court and I wrote back saying "too late mate".

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've been putting it off but I've just got around to filling out the claim form and the Value box is confusing me.

 

I want to claim £400 in charges and then the 8% interest on top of that is £177.23. I don't want to claim for overdraft interest since it's a minimal amount and I can't work out what the court fee is I should be claiming. (I do know that I'm not entitled to exemption though)

 

Can someone help me with what I should put in the box? The S.69 County Courts Act 1984 seems to be mentioned twice in the template? is this the 8% interest?

 

Also, what do you put in the 'In the' box at the top of the first page and how do you get the text to fit in the box on the second page, there's not enough room!

 

I think the layout may have changed from when the guide on how to fill it out was written. There is for instance no place to put your local courts name.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I think I worked out most of it myself,

 

Charges £400.00

Interest under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 £177.23

Court Fee £80

 

TOTAL £ 657.23

 

Then I add the other bit of text about the s.69 county courts act and charge an additional 9p a day interest until the case is settled.

 

Is it really worth me bothering to add that bit for an extra 9p a day?

 

 

All I'm troubled with now is what to write in the In the box at the top of page 1 and how to fit in all the text from the template in the PARTICULARS OF CLAIM box.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, nevermind, I've just realised that the bit about 'I believe this to be true' etc. Is now part of the form so I can remove it from my particulars of claim and just fill that bit in at the bottom. Can't I?

 

I still need to know what goes in the 'In the' box at the top

 

Also, is £80 the correct fee for the amount I'm claiming?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice of Issue received today.

 

It says that the claim was issued on 11/4 and sent to the defendant first class on 11/4. It will be deemed to have been served on 13/4 and the defendant has until 27/4 to reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I got a letter from HSBC today offering me £257.50.

 

It also says that my claim goes back more than six years (I double checked and the charges I claimed go back to 09/03/01, I posted my first letter to them 28/02/07 although of couse by now those charges are more than 6 years old) and that they won't be refunding those charges.

 

It also says that the charges I have supplied include an amount of £115 which is an unpaid cheque fee that they will also not refund (I still don't know what this charge really is and I questioned it in the first place before I started doing this so should I really be claiming it?!)

 

So from the looks of it they are offering the £400 I originally requested minus the £115 and one £27.50 overdrawn charge.

 

They have until 17/05 to file a defence and they have asked that I accept their offer within 10 working days or they will take it that I have declined their offer (10 working days from now is 16/05)

 

I'm a bit concerned about this £115 charge, as I don't know what it's for and they do could they not use that in their defence to dismiss the whole claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya £115 is a big charge, I think the least they should do is prove how its made up, together with the opther charges of course.

 

If its for an unpaid cheque its still a charge and not a fee and they should be paying it.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...