Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Multiple Holding Deposit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Now I want to get my full holdind deposit back bacause I found out that the landlord did not accepted housing benefit.

 

My £250 holding deposit had hold this property for 4 hours.

It looks like as .......

I could advertise a £1000 pcm flat for £250pcm - get loads of viewings and deposits then keep them all -- i would make far more money doing this than actually letting the flat !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you cannot keep the deposit if you do not let the flat to someone. However if you did not disclose the fact you were on benefits when asked and the property was taken off the market for you then in some instances the deposit could be kept (if due to not disclosing benefits the landlord had lost potential tennants).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you really consider that the property was taken off the market for me?

In fact, there were not and was not any restrictions (for example-Housing Benefit) on many websites. Really the agent did not ask me exactly on that day 22/02/07 about it but I had told it to the agents in last 4 months.

=======================================================

22/02/07 at 11:58am I paid £250.00 Holding Deposit.

22/02/07 at 16:15pm, second deposit was paid to the agency.

24/02/07 I provided the agency all forms confirming our income, housing benefit and references in writing.

01/03/07 Mr Tom Lee promised me if the landlord refused me or choose another tenant then Beaumont Residential Agency must return me an entire holding deposit.

05/03/07 Mr Kerim phoned us to tell that the landlord did not accepted Housing Benefit and this house was again on the market. He also asked us to come to the office in order to collect the deposit.

 

15/03/07 Mr Tom Lee refused to return my holding deposit and refused to confirm this decision in writing because "we did disclose the fact we were on benefits when asked."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok the long and short of it is you can't sue anyone, you aren't due any compensation. But they should give you your deposit back. I would give a formal warning stating that you intend to chase the matter through the small claims court if they do not return the deposit, also if the agency is a member of ARLA then you could report them to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I did it on 13/03/07. The agency is not a member of ARLA.

 

"Dear Sir or Madam,

RE: Refund of holding deposit £250, 100 Arran Road, SE6 2NN

I am writing to complain about bad services which I have received in your agency since 22/02/2007 and insist on a refund of the holding deposit.

At first, you have broken the Terms and Conditions for holding deposits as you showed this property twice after I paid holding deposit. However, two agents promised me not to do it.

Secondly, the Fee of Intent Letter for the holding deposit was not signed by me. The date written on was also wrong. Also Mr Kerim refused to state in writing why the landlord/agency decides to keep my holding deposit and constantly refused me to give his or his manager's surname, to let to speak to the manager or to make an appointment to the manager.

In fact, we are looking 3 bed house in Bellingham area since October 2006, your agents showed me many houses and I always told them that I am not working, receive housing benefit and can pay 6 month rent in advance if necessary. Also my references were successful in two agencies in last two months. This house appeared on Internet since the middle of January 2007 (where it is and was not showed that the landlord does not accept Housing Benefit-copy enclosed) but was not available for viewing. During this period I asked the landlord many questions through the agency. The landlord promised to accept minimum of £1100 pcm and 6 months in advance because I was not working and my family receives housing benefits.

Finally, if I do not receive an entire holding deposit £250 I will complain to the small claims court, ADR, trading standards agency and ombudsman for compensation for the actual financial loss.

You must contact me within 7 days to avoid paying additional charges and legal fees.

Please do not underestimate the seriousness of this matter. It is your best interest to pay in full.

Yours faithfully,"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Good result!

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Help needed! - we've recently vacated our flat (there were 4 of us living there) and the deposit has been released from DPS over a month ago to one of the other tenants. And now they are refusing to pay me my share of the deposit? What are my options?

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...