Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
    • Thanks for uploading the appeal.  It was a waste of time but well done in not outing the driver. Why have your friends paid £60 they don't owe to a cowboy private company that have no means of making them pay as they don't do court?  If they paid by card, as I presume they did, they should get on to their bank and do a chargeback immediately. We call the £70 the Unicorn Food Tax.  The law specifically states they are only allowed to charge the original £100 but the PPCs and their bezzies in their trade associations allow this made-up extra £70 so £100 becomes £170.  Unfortunately for them the law doesn't. Anyway, snotty letter time. There is an example in post 32 here you can tweak as it's the same company but a different car park   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/463964-alliance-anpr-pcn-lease-car-appeals-refused-daymer-bay-cornwall/page/2/#comments  
    • Thank god you're not a part of the tribunal! Terribly biased and negative.  HR isn't all knowing. And this case proves it. Thanks again for your opinion.  I'm not going to court because of a few emails, I'm going to court because the head of HR has invented a PCP solely for me, which no other employee is made to sit. The language used in the emails is discriminatory and inflammatory.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A&L making up own rules with SAR....


Bradders33
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6283 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Having successfully taken Halifax to court I am now embarking on A&L, I first of all tried to get to view my statements on-line (Only have 2.5 years worth.) but they said that they cannot do that, but if I want statements I can have them sent out at £5 a statement!!!!!!:eek:

 

So instead I said that I would request is as a Subject Access Request instead for £10, they said fine. (Obviously thought they could scare me off with the £5 statements.)

 

I sent the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter a week ago, it was signed for next day and in the letter I said to take the statatory £10 direct from my a/c.

 

Money still not been taken, so I call them today and ask what is happening, they said they haven't had my letter (They have, it's been signed for.) and that when they do finally get my letter that they will send me a loads of forms out to fill in for my statement request!! And to send a £10 CHEQUE back with forms, they won't take from my a/c they say.

 

I know that if I am going down the £5 a statement route that they say you have to fill out various forms, but surely my letter is enough for my request....

 

Just smacks to me of delaying tactics.

 

I rang Complaints Management in Bootle and they said they would email the relevant department and ask them to look at my request today, but they may want me to fill out further forms with may take 7-10 days..... Arrrrrrrgh!

 

What can I do? I don't want this dragging out. I'm going round in circles.

 

Bradders. x

 

PS: Hubby is taking Lloyds to court tonight!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st things first

 

if you used the SAr template from the library and offered payment 9ie authorised them to chareg your account) then i think the SAR has been served and the date they received it is the date from which their 40days starts.

 

The Act doesnt specify how the payment must be made, onmly that the SAR must be in writing and the approrpirate fee must be paid.

 

If tyou have offered it and authorised them to take the moeny from yuor account then there is no reason for them to refuse such a request, or at least not to delay the request.

 

Re asking you to fill in forms, the DPA is quite specific about the form of the SAR and if you have used the library template then you do not need to fill in any forms to apply.

 

However, the DPA does allow data controllers to satisfy themselves that you are who you say you are ie ask you for some form of ID.

 

from what you say you are using an active account and using your normal address for communication and indeed they are happy to respond to your request.

 

They cannot therefore accede to written requests to carry out management of your account say change of address or contact details and the use the same address to ascertain who you are.

 

In reality of course if they decide to be awkward of course the could refuse to supply the data unless you fill out their forms and leave you to either take them to court or complain to the ico.

 

What i would do is when they respond is supply the information they have asked for and confrim when the original SAR was filed and remind them thay have 40days to comply.

 

incidentally the DPA doesnt qualify whether a request to ascertain your id should 're-start' the 40 day time period or not.

 

since it doesnt state it then as far as i can tell then they have to still comply with the 40days.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bradders,

 

I'm just posting off my SAR today. So will watch with interest, good luck! You'll see from my thread i did things a bit back to front so i'm going to start from the beginning again and send off all the templates from this site!

19/02: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to A & L

20/02 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to HBoS

20/02 SAR sent to Capital One

21/02 Prem letter sent to RBS for £304

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

Yep me too, just completed the template letter and will be sent recorded delivery tomorrow, good to read the possible problems ahead and how to fight them, its good to know someone is at the same stage as me, lets keep each other informed. Good Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today received the questionaire mentioned.just two pages - basically a check on who you are etc and asking to send the £10.00

 

unfortunately already sent this by recorded delivery with the letter and they dont seemed to have acknowledged this - so I am sure I have more problems sorting this out - luckily I photocopied cheque before posting it!:rolleyes:

 

jansus

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st things first

 

if you used the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) template from the library and offered payment 9ie authorised them to chareg your account) then i think the SAR has been served and the date they received it is the date from which their 40days starts.

 

The Act doesnt specify how the payment must be made, onmly that the SAR must be in writing and the approrpirate fee must be paid.

 

If tyou have offered it and authorised them to take the moeny from yuor account then there is no reason for them to refuse such a request, or at least not to delay the request.

 

Re asking you to fill in forms, the Data Protection Act is quite specific about the form of the SAR and if you have used the library template then you do not need to fill in any forms to apply.

 

However, the DPA does allow data controllers to satisfy themselves that you are who you say you are ie ask you for some form of ID.

 

from what you say you are using an active account and using your normal address for communication and indeed they are happy to respond to your request.

 

They cannot therefore accede to written requests to carry out management of your account say change of address or contact details and the use the same address to ascertain who you are.

 

In reality of course if they decide to be awkward of course the could refuse to supply the data unless you fill out their forms and leave you to either take them to court or complain to the Information Commissioners Office.

 

What i would do is when they respond is supply the information they have asked for and confrim when the original SAR was filed and remind them thay have 40days to comply.

 

incidentally the DPA doesnt qualify whether a request to ascertain your id should 're-start' the 40 day time period or not.

 

since it doesnt state it then as far as i can tell then they have to still comply with the 40days.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

 

Thanks for that Glenn, since I last spoke to them someone has called me back and confirmed that my letter will suffice after all and my statements will be with me within the 40 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
:x Well what a surprise, A & L sent a letter to say that they had no record of the account number i had quoted, and the account number they quoted wasn't even mine!!! So i've written back basically saying why are you using this account number, and they've now have 31 days left to comply. Will also send this recorded delivery. Hey ho!!
Link to post
Share on other sites

:x Well what a surprise, A & L sent a letter to say that they had no record of the account number i had quoted, and the account number they quoted wasn't even mine!!! So i've written back basically saying why are you using this account number, and they've now have 31 days left to comply. Will also send this recorded delivery. Hey ho!!

 

Oh dear poor you. :mad:

 

I have heard nada from them, they have not taken my tenner either, they have until 24th March to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Winnie

 

Just a thought, you know A & L account numbers are a bit odd, i.e you add numbers when quoting DD info etc then remove at other times etc, you did quote the right number didn't you? If you look about you'll see i used to work for them and this did confuse things for me at times, although it sounds like someone was being lazy as you requested SAR so they should be pumping your name into the computer and not just your account number!

19/02: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to A & L

20/02 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to HBoS

20/02 SAR sent to Capital One

21/02 Prem letter sent to RBS for £304

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cashed the cheque for my SR on the 22nd January and I've heard nothing yet. No forms to fill in, no correspondence whatsoever. I think they are stalling in case there's some kind of ruling in the next month or so.

 

I reckon it's 40 days TOMORROW. What would you advise my next step be should I receive nothing before Monday (giving them postage time)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Noisy

 

I would just fill out the LBA about failure to provide information.

 

You can find it at

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

19/02: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to A & L

20/02 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent to HBoS

20/02 SAR sent to Capital One

21/02 Prem letter sent to RBS for £304

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...