Jump to content


OMG!!! £10,332 and then some!!


Destinyofsouls
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6175 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Received my statements today and had a look through and found that they owe me

 

£10,332 + Feb 07

 

Barbados - get the sunbeds ready!!! IZA comin' baby!! ( I'll take Dotty with me ;) )

 

Back to earth- how the hell am I going to claim this back? They are going to put up a hell of a fight.

 

I will probs need some help of you lovely people further down the line,but for now - claim going out tomorrow.

Might take it to branch and say loudly when it packed

' Excuse me, could you please take this letter of me, it's for claiming 10 grand of charges you put on my account'

Love to see their faces.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all,

Received my statements today and had a look through and found that they owe me

 

£10,332 + Feb 07

 

Barbados - get the sunbeds ready!!! IZA comin' baby!! ( I'll take Dotty with me ;) )

 

Back to earth- how the hell am I going to claim this back? They are going to put up a hell of a fight.

 

I will probs need some help of you lovely people further down the line,but for now - claim going out tomorrow.

Might take it to branch and say loudly when it packed

' Excuse me, could you please take this letter of me, it's for claiming 10 grand of charges you put on my account'

Love to see their faces.

 

Hello,

Not wanting to give the impression that Abbey might use Delay Tactic if you try this:D

 

Make sure you get a receipt for the letter when you hand it in, then they can`t turn round and say they have not received it.

Its important that you get proof of receipt, and follow up within YOUR timescales -

* Give them 14 days to respond

* Send Letter Before Action

* Give them 14 Days to Respond

* File in Court

 

As for the £10k and them putting up a fight, they might give the impression that they will fight you in court, but they won`t!

You`ll get settlement sometime before 1 minute before the hearing (normally within 48 hours at the moment)

So be prepared for the long haul (and I don`t mean the flight to Barbados) and you`ll win in the end

 

Good Luck (Not that Luck Comes into it really)

VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE MY OWN - IF THEY HELP - PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

Halifax - S.A.R - June 06

- Pre-Lim(£1665) July 06

- LBA - July 06

- MCOL - 15th Aug 06

- Acknowledged 18th Aug

- Settled IN FULL :eek:

- 2nd Claim Started - 12 Dec 2006

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

- 3rd Claim Started (Phone Call) 1st March 2007

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Abbey National - S.A.R - 23/08/06

- Default Removal Letter sent 21st Sept

- LBA sent with Estimated Charges 4/10/06

- 2nd LBA 23/10/06

- N1 filed 9/11/06 - Deemed Served 16/11/06

- AQ & Draft Directions filed 19/12/06

- Court Hearing 22/3/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:o INCLUDING £5k COMPENSATION

Capital One - S.A.R. 10/10/06

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Alliance & Leicester - Mortgage E/S/C Claim 02/03/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Take a look at the top of this forum under 'Abbey & Cahoot successes' & find the thread by 'Catherinebear' I've just finished reading the whole thread & she recovered £13,000+ at the end of last year. She seems a really lovely person & despite all she has been through recently she is very happy to help anyone who needs it. :D There are also lots of other lovely people on this site too with heaps of useful advice...her story is very inspiring indeed for those of us just starting the battle with Abbey!

 

Good luck.

 

Villafan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Help is needed!

 

Today received form the court

Upon the Courts own motion. The court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

 

It is orderd that the matter be listed for directions on 3 April with an estimated time of 10mins.

 

What is this? Do I have to go? What's it for?

I can feel a Deidre coming on!!!

 

Help

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW this is not the £10K one, it's a little one my OH have has. (woops! told everyone now)

 

Its for £1.5K

Followed and used all the templates in the library. Sent in AQ 12/3. Using the strike out order as in the Lincoln case, and attaching a list of cases settled without a hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And another thing, it's a bit short notice isn't it? received today and hearing on 3rd April?

 

My OH can't make it then, now what does he do?

 

I'm really panicking now. I've done this work for him and looks like we are going down the pan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't got a clue what it means.. but thought I'd bump the trhead for you - see if we can get the attention of some more knowledgable people.. Good Luck anyway!

Cahoot

JBD issued - 27/07/06, warrant issued 08/08/06

First Direct

Settled in Full

Capital One

Prelim Sent

Citi Financial

Offer of difference betwen £30 and £12

GE Capital - Evans Card, Data Protection Act

Argos Card, DPA

Barclay Card, 8th May-DPA, 14th July- 2nd DPA (asking complete history!!)

Egg Card & Egg Loan,DPA

NatWest Card

LBA

Vodfone

3rd letter re: default

Studio & Ace

Prelim for Studio e-mailed

 

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I put in Sect G of 149

In respect of my claim, I would respectfully ask the court to consider the attached order.

 

There is now a wealth of evidence that the Banks are reluctant to pursue any defence of the claims of their clients against unfair bank charges, thus abusing and wasting valuable court time and resources.

Also attached is a list of cases of the bank filing a defence for this type of claim and yet settling the claim before the court hearing.

Until they are in a position to reveal all to the courts, I would hope that the Honorable Judges at the Court would take note of this information in bringing a speedy conclusion to claims that they are dealing with.

And attached this order

General Form of Judgment or Order

 

Upon the courts own motion. The court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing.

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

1/ The court of its own motion is considering striking the Defence in this action as an abuse of process

 

2/ The basis for this is the fact that the Defendant is settling all claims of this nature where claimants are seeking the reimbursement of bank charges, with no claims proceeding to a contested hearing

 

3/ The court considers the authority of Mullen-V Hackney London Borough Council (1997)2 A11ER 906 relevant

 

4/ If the defendant objects to the proposed strike out it is ordered to file within 14 days of this order a schedule setting out all claims of this type in England and Wales which have proceeded to a final contested hearing, and the outcome of such hearings, together with a schedule of all such claims which it has compromised before final hearing, after proceedings have been issued

 

5/ Upon receipt of any such objections the court will consider listing the claim for an on notice hearing of the strike out issue

 

6/ In the absence of any such objections being filed in time, the defence herein will be struck out and entered for the amount claimed, together with the appropriate costs claimable on the small claims track.

 

 

I now need someone to tell me I don't have to go to court !!1

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Karne the full order that I sent.

IN THE xxxx COUNTY COURT CLAIM NO. xxxx

BETWEEN:

xxxxxx - CLAIMANT

And

ABBEYNATIONAL BANK PLC - DEFENDANT

General Form of Judgment or Order

 

Upon the courts own motion. The court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing.

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

 

1/ The court of its own motion is considering striking the Defence in this action as an abuse of process

 

2/ The basis for this is the fact that the Defendant is settling all claims of this nature where claimants are seeking the reimbursement of bank charges, with no claims proceeding to a contested hearing

 

3/ The court considers the authority of Mullen-V Hackney London Borough Council (1997)2 A11ER 906 relevant

 

4/ If the defendant objects to the proposed strike out it is ordered to file within 14 days of this order a schedule setting out all claims of this type in England and Wales which have proceeded to a final contested hearing, and the outcome of such hearings, together with a schedule of all such claims which it has compromised before final hearing, after proceedings have been issued

 

5/ Upon receipt of any such objections the court will consider listing the claim for an on notice hearing of the strike out issue

 

6/ In the absence of any such objections being filed in time, the defence herein will be struck out and entered for the amount claimed, together with the appropriate costs claimable on the small claims track.

 

 

But where do I find the Mullen case? I've googled it but cannot find the actual case. Just in case he asks me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Destinyofsouls

 

i can understand why you are panicking a bit

 

but you just CANNOT lose

 

abbey will not go to court to defend this claim, as they cannot prove that penalty charges are proportionate to their actual costs

 

whether its a claim for £50 or £50,000 - both will be settled before any court hearing

 

hope this helps

post office WON 12/11/06

 

abbey.LBA sent 30/10/06.MCOL claim submitted 8/11/06.allocation questionnaire sent 16/12/06.schedule of charges sent 16/12/06.WON

 

2nd abbey claim SAR sent 3/1/07.WON.complaint letter sent 18/1/08

 

alliance and Leicester.WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

quickly looking on the CAG chat site, it looks like TSB turned up for one claim!!!!

 

Abbey have turned up at court on a number of claims:o

But they have still to appear in court:D

 

There will, I doubt, never be an occasion when a bank turns up at court to argue its case that their charges are fair, they have the whole world stacked against them, and believe me, that is not very strong odds! and certainly not odds that would entice a bank to take a chance.

 

I`ve not read your thread fully, but, I would suggest that 2 weeks before your court date give James Arrandale a call at the Abbey, ask him if he wants to settle, he will:D

VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE MY OWN - IF THEY HELP - PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

Halifax - S.A.R - June 06

- Pre-Lim(£1665) July 06

- LBA - July 06

- MCOL - 15th Aug 06

- Acknowledged 18th Aug

- Settled IN FULL :eek:

- 2nd Claim Started - 12 Dec 2006

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

- 3rd Claim Started (Phone Call) 1st March 2007

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Abbey National - S.A.R - 23/08/06

- Default Removal Letter sent 21st Sept

- LBA sent with Estimated Charges 4/10/06

- 2nd LBA 23/10/06

- N1 filed 9/11/06 - Deemed Served 16/11/06

- AQ & Draft Directions filed 19/12/06

- Court Hearing 22/3/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:o INCLUDING £5k COMPENSATION

Capital One - S.A.R. 10/10/06

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Alliance & Leicester - Mortgage E/S/C Claim 02/03/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

aRMSOFT

 

The hearing is for directions only. Haven't got a clue what to say. Karnevil has kindlyt helped me out with things to take, but I cannot get a copy of the Mullen case anywhere. He might ask me what that case is all about and I can't tell him

Link to post
Share on other sites

aRMSOFT

 

The hearing is for directions only. Haven't got a clue what to say. Karnevil has kindlyt helped me out with things to take, but I cannot get a copy of the Mullen case anywhere. He might ask me what that case is all about and I can't tell him

 

 

The power of google:

 

ex parte London Borough of Hackney -v- Maureen Mullen [1996] EWCA Civ 76718 Oct 1996

CA

Housing, Litigation PracticeThe authority appealed a fine of £5,000 for a breach of an undertaking to carry out repairs to their tenant's property. They complained that there had been no evidence of previous breaches, and that the judge had been wrong to take account of other breaches. Held: The authority might have applied for an adjournment, anticipating the order to be made. It had not. The judge was exercising a proper discretion, was entitled to take account of other breaches, and also to use his own special knowledge of the respondent's behaviour in other cases. An affidavit from the authority that it had only broken one such order in the previous twelve months was not to the point.Link omitted

 

 

also

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/10581-dead-dawn-lloyds-tsb-5.html

 

post#90

  • Haha 1

All advice offered here is my opinion only based on what I would do in a given situation. If you wish to act on it you do so at your own discretion

......................................................

I have no legal expertise or qualification, and give advice on the basis of my own experience and nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Destiny. You just need to await further directions now. It is very unlikey you will have to go to court.

 

I have filed against Abbey for £9,300 on behalf of my friend. We just received acknowledgement this week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...