Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescot help!!


keith777
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6260 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you haven't already done so, stop paying them.

 

The (alledged) debt is now unenforceable until such time as they produce the agreement. After 30 days (I think) they have committed an offence, and even if they manage to produce the agreement, they cannot take any action without the courts permission.

 

Have a good read around the forum, lots of people are in the same boat as you with these waste of space ****, and by following their progress you'll have a much better idea of where to go next.

Nil Illigitimus Carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 working days (Mon-Fri) or 13 calendar days? Work it out from the date of receipt. You did send the letter recorded delivery and you have the chit and proof of delivery?

 

If they don't send the details within the time allowed by law they cannot proceed without a court order. To do that they must produce the documents required and persuade a judge they are legally entitled to chase you for the debt. If their failure to provide the documents continues for a calendar month beyond the 12 working days the deafult means a criminal offence has been committed and the likelihood of them going to court diminishes a great deal.

 

Until the time limits are up there isn't anything to do. Once time is up though report the company to the OFT. Don't expect them to do anything but an avalanche of complaints about the debt collecting industry may spur the paper pushers to do something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I sent Wescot a letter requesting copy of contract. [see my other post]

 

I received a reply today [9 working days]

 

The letter asked me to provide them with my date of birth and last 3 addresses.

 

Are they still obligated to provide me the copy of contract within 12 working days or has this letter they sent me ended the 12 days request?

They also sent me back the £1 postal order.

 

Are they obligated to send me the copy of the contract within 12 days as I have asked for it and not request further infromation from me?

 

I am slightly confused with the situation now

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

definetely delaying tactics. write back stating that the address they used to issue their claim to, was good enough for them so its good enough for you. your DOB should be on the requested documents, ask them to check :-)

 

they can do whatever they like with the money including set fire to it, the clock is still ticking (but I would send it back anyway)

 

write something like......

 

dear sirs

 

you have been in receipt of my request for information regarding my alleged debt since (date)

you have a statutory duty to supply the requested information within a specific timeframe.

 

I would suggest you read up on the Consumer Credit act 1974 especially sections 77 to 78 and 189

 

you have 12 working days to comply fully with my request after which the debt is unenforceable without a court order. After a further month you have commited an offence, and can be reported to the statutory bodies. your 12 days expired on (date) and your month expires on (date).

 

I would like you to know that as the proper documentation has not been produced you cannot action this alledged debt any further. Also if you have put any defaults against my name in relation to this debt, I require you to remove them IMMEDIATELY.

 

I await your response

 

etc

 

 

 

or a more formal template (borrowed)

 

I refer to my letters dated XXXXXXXX which was delivered via recorded delivery to your offices on XXXXXXXX, and my follow up letter dated XXXXXXXX.

 

In my letter xxxxxxI made a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above numbered XXXXXXXX account under section 77(1) and section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act. In addition a statement of my account should have been sent along with any other document mentioned in the credit agreement.

 

The Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for this request to be carried out before your company enter into a default situation. If the request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days, Your company commit an offence. These time limits expired on XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX respectively.

 

As you are no doubt aware subsection (6) states:

 

If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

 

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

Therefore as at XXXXXXXX this account became unenforceable at law and it is now my intention to refer this matter to the enforcement authorities.

 

Any default notices or adverse comments your company have recorded on my credit reference file should be immediately removed.

 

Failure to respond favourably to this letter within seven (7) days of receipt will result in immediate litigation being commenced against your company without further notice.

 

I await your rapid response.

 

 

either approach will do ...

 

rgds

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot for the replies

 

Just need to check before I reply back to them:

 

The alleged debt was from Hutchinson 3G - now on my other thread a forum member has advised that CCA doesn't apply to mobile phone operators - is this correct? and even if it was - how am I meant to know that Hutchinson 3G is a mobile phone operator?

 

Sorry to have 2 threads (I sort of hijacked this thread - apologies)

Original thread :

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/81496-wescot-some-advice-please.html

 

I'm trying to get a letter back out to Wescot as soon as possible

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear All

 

I am about to write and send a response back to Wescot today

 

Can someone clarify please that:

 

1. there would be no point me sending them the 'you are in breach of the CCA' letter because the debt concerns Hutchinson 3G and therefore a mobile contract.

 

2. I should instead send them a SAR with £10 postal order

 

3. re: breach of Data Protection Act - state they were in breach of DPA when they sent me a details of the account without first confirming the right recipient.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...