Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is a big improvement Dave and I do agree that it s best to leave it till the last moment to prevent VCS from countering your WS. [usually using doubtful logic that can't be easily argued against in a Court atmosphere] However my first post [no. 32] about the contract is the one that really exposes Jake's flummery and calls into  question jost how close he comes to committing perjury. And that is what hopefully VCS will not want questioned by a Judge. 
    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance and Flooring Problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6326 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I live with my partner and four friends in a rented house furnished by the landlord.

 

Our dishwasher broke down just before Christmas and despite repeated calls to the landlord, he didn't come out for about three weeks.

 

During this time the dishwasher leaked, unbeknown to us, and all the real wooden floor has cracked and buckled.

 

We have rented accom insurance with Endsleigh, who say they won't cover it as it is the landlord's responsibility.

 

Now our landlord says HIS insurance doesn't cover it, ours should, and if we don't sort it, the repair bill is coming out of our bond.

 

The work is estimated at about £3k - help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he has not attended to the fault, he is responsible. The insurance situation makes no difference.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does in the sense of where does the money come from to fix the floor, as our contents does not cover and he CLAIMS his insurance doesn't either.

 

We suspect he does not have the correct insurance.

 

He used to live here and we think he has just left the buildings cover in place, rather than set up specialist landlord insurance for furnished properties.

 

Which also makes us wonder if he has a BTL mortgage in place or permission to let from his mortgage company.

 

What are the repercussions (for him) of not notifying your mortgage company you are letting your property?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt, for you, as you are not responsible. How he funds it is his problem.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree 100% with everything BB has posted, both with regards the insurance issue and whos responsibility it is also.

 

With regards whether his mortgage company knows it is BTL or not, stay well out of it. It is firmly out of the realms of "your business", so I would not go there. However, the penalties are basically that the mortgage company will probably do little other thanup their interest or similar. Technically, the mortgage company can attempt repossession for breach of T&Cs, but the chances of this are extremely slim.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks everyone.

 

My OH is going to see the council's private tenant solictor during the week.

 

An interesting point is during a conversation between my OH and the landlord (witnessed by me), the landlord suggested we change to an insurance company that WOULD let us claim for the floor, wait a month, then bung a claim in.

 

He backtracked pretty quick when we pointed out this was insurance fraud, something we are not willing to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if you could claim, I would not, as it is not your responsibility.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE -

 

Our landlord has obviously read or seen something to make him realise he is not on un-shakeable ground.

 

My OH got a phone call today, app the landlord's insurance now WILL cover the damage.

 

The flooring is to be replaced this week at no cost to ourselves, there is no more talk of us being wrongly insured or being in any way resposible.

 

Thanks for your advice all.

 

Jane

Co-op - £128 settled in full, June '06

First Direct - £125 settled in full, July '06

Barclays - offer made, Dec '06.

First Direct part deux - charges refunded in full, Oct '06, threatened to close a/c in Nov '06, letter dispatched to head man.

Student Loan Company - £25 of charges refunded, Nov '06.

 

Mr Princess

Lloyds - LBA dispatched, Oct '06

MBNA - LBA dispatched, Nov '06

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS just out of interest, who do other tenants insure through?

 

As there are four us living together, all young professionals, we were knocked back by everyone but Endsleigh for being too "high risk".

 

Basically you can marry someone you've just met and get home insurance anywhere, but live with two longterm pals and a partner and you'll all be smashing the place up.

 

Endsleigh are fine, BTW, £12-ish a month to cover all our possessions, computers, laptop, TVs etc.

Co-op - £128 settled in full, June '06

First Direct - £125 settled in full, July '06

Barclays - offer made, Dec '06.

First Direct part deux - charges refunded in full, Oct '06, threatened to close a/c in Nov '06, letter dispatched to head man.

Student Loan Company - £25 of charges refunded, Nov '06.

 

Mr Princess

Lloyds - LBA dispatched, Oct '06

MBNA - LBA dispatched, Nov '06

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had exactly the same problem my housing association wouldn't pay up after my washing machine leaked went through the kitchen into the hall and through to the living/dining room they told me it wasn't covered under buildings insurance as it wasn't fixed to the floor hmmmmmm most of it was ceramic tiles but there ya go, well I went 6 months with no floor with a new born baby my insurance contents cover kept saying that it was buildings insurance as it was flooring couldn't get much luck anywhere so I read through my more than policy an low an behold there was a excemption for tenants phoned head office and had it all fixed had to claim on my insurance mind but point of this is everyone is trying to con you read your landlords policy and also insurance policy, if they state they dont cover belonging placed in the house then read insurance they should have a sub section (really small writing with confusing words best to have a dictionary) about tenants, phone head office if you cannot get help from customer services etc, the cus ser guy that was speaking to me whilst trying to claim was reading the tenants section but he was saying this word cant remember it exactly and saying that it meant they wouldn't pay out under sections bla bla bla when really it meant that they would only pay out under sections bla bla bla

Link to post
Share on other sites

The difference here tax_in_2001 is (from your post) it appears that you owned your washing machine - You owned the faulty appliance and it's your machine that caused the damage. Thus your insurance should pay.

 

But thejanegirl's original post says the landlord owns the dishwasher that caused the damage - and that means that the damage caused by his faulty machine is covered by his insurance.

 

 

Oh right, my fault I mis-read. I know a few tenants around by me their insurance companys counter claim off the landlords insurance is there any chance of this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...