Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Subject Data Acess Requests


Sparkie1723
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6363 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A little bit of info that could assist a lot of forum members, I wonder how many menbers have considered sending a SDAR to the credit Reference Agencies?

I did and I received over 2000 pages of info.. yes! thats right 2000, and in there I found a lot of info that is helping me in my court case against The RBOS, to give you an idea of how serious my case is, it is being heard on the Multi track. The barrister for The RBOS (Cobbetts of course ) wanted it to be heard on the fast track, but the judge said "no way hose" There are too many issues at stake in this case.

 

Sparkie 1723

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
A little bit of info that could assist a lot of forum members, I wonder how many menbers have considered sending a SDAR to the credit Reference Agencies?

I did and I received over 2000 pages of info.. yes! thats right 2000, and in there I found a lot of info that is helping me in my court case against The RBOS, to give you an idea of how serious my case is, it is being heard on the Multi track. The barrister for The RBOS (Cobbetts of course ) wanted it to be heard on the fast track, but the judge said "no way hose" There are too many issues at stake in this case.

 

Sparkie 1723

 

Sparkie have you got a template for the request I'll make the ba*****ds work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bloody hell I didn't even think about sending one of these to them.

 

One is on its way.

 

Mike

If I've helped tip my scales

 

Blair Oliver & Scott, £2500 written off December 2006 Default removed January 2007:D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/56001-mike220359-blair-oliver-scott.html

 

Monument, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

Lloyds TSB didn't sign the agreement!

:D

 

Citicards, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

RBS tut, tut!

:rolleyes:

 

Morgan Stanley, oh dear

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparkie,

 

Must admit I hadn't thought of doing that. I am reluctant to use the usual "report" facility with them as you have to let them know your addresses over the last 6 years, which I won't. What did you actually send to them ?

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just had equifax on the phone in relation to a notice i sent them under section 10 and 12 of the Data Protection Act, it was my understanding from an email that they have managed to confirm a defaulted account that has no credit agreement and refused to correct it or remove it. I know there's no agreement as it has been set up wrongly and appeared twice on my credit file. They refused to move the information and removed the notice of correction - oh dear! That ****ed me off!

 

I have read most things on here and managed to draft a 7 page letter to them with a request for the to stop processing personal data or third party information without my written consent unless covered by the data protection act or they provide a copy of a contract that i have agreed that allows them to publish the information. The contract has to be an active one!

 

They were very very very polite on the phone, i wonder if the statement at the end of the letter which did state that in 21 days i will be ensuring the information is circulated and failure will result in immediate legal action through the county court and a private prosecution against the data controller which could result in a £5000 fine or prison, i will also ensure the legal claim gets publish in the legal section of the national press (The Times) the document and legal challenge would have severe consequences for these companies as the information is not in the public domain. (Couldn't resist) I have been informed that i will get a letter by return today with there decision and can't wait, I only faxed it last night. No argument were made to the letter on the phone and it had gone to the senior CR manager, very polite and nice (I am still in shock). They didn't state anything about them having a legal right either although the letter does cover the act very well.

 

My letter did state that information will be shared on this site. I will update and if sucessful publish it on here.

 

In addition I expect all information remove in three weeks. time will tell if sucessful and if so i will have contact more CRA's Exeprian ect.

SBFIDO

 

Accredited Member of the CIEH

 

No more will I be bullied or harassed.

 

When informed that the call is recorded for training and monitoring I always say I don't want it used for training. :razz:

 

I always ask for the ICO registration information - they often dont have it, shame i never discuss my personal data unless I know they comply with the DPA.

 

Finally I always record calls and state at the start of there call. Although I don't have too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sbfido,

First of all send a SDAR to Equifax, also in the letter you are going to apply to the court for an under section 10 of the DPA ( the right to prevent processing likely to cause damage and distress to remove the information also that you will be claiming damages against them for this distress,and get this point over to them real strong, that you are aware now that Credit Reference Agencies are not "custodians of the data they hold now, under the 1984 DPA they were, and usd this to bluff people but under the new 1998 DPA that came into force in 2001 has changed the roile of CRA's and they are now classed as Data Controller, dont let them bluff you, they are Data Controllers now.

Tell them that by s

refusing to remove the data that is not covered by an agreement they are in breach of the FOURTH PRINCIPLE of the DPA a) "Data shall be accurate and, where necessary kept up to date" b) Data are inaccurate if they are incorrect or misleading as to any matter of fact".

 

In the ICO legal guidance The THIRD PRINCIPLE states that Data Controllers should consider " the possible consequenses for individuals of the holding of such data".

 

THeres a lot more about this than you realise my advice to you is to send for the legal guidance book.

Dat Protection Act 1998.........ISBN no1:870466 23 3

 

Sparkie1723:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent the notice to both parties and the response i got was that they have investigated and been told the information is correct, i have asked for there evidence.

 

Two accounts that relate to the same account yet equate to two deafults different default dates / same start time / same account number/ two comapnies names/ same amount of monies and yet defaults are different and one state HP one states Loan. This relates to a car i returned after the company breached the agreement. I also have all the letters relating to this and the 9 months it took to get the car back to them. The breaches they did and threatening behaviour and 11,000 of charges, Harsh, I also have three dates on credit information CRA date / Credit agreement my original copy TYPIN ERROR say Shephen instead of Stephen and then warrenty cover starting on another date. FAB!

 

I also have one default that is an account i have not seen - no cca although requestered and told by the company they are not wasting there time on it don't call again - twice! A court summons pending for this MCOL already issued and served 27/12/ provided information to CRA and they still say its correct. I have also sent CCA request to Interim Justice that state they are returning my cheques as they can not provide information and i should contact the original company - but they state as above do not contact! Catch 22

SBFIDO

 

Accredited Member of the CIEH

 

No more will I be bullied or harassed.

 

When informed that the call is recorded for training and monitoring I always say I don't want it used for training. :razz:

 

I always ask for the ICO registration information - they often dont have it, shame i never discuss my personal data unless I know they comply with the DPA.

 

Finally I always record calls and state at the start of there call. Although I don't have too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sbfido

Take it a step at a time send your SDAR and letter off to Equifax, get ALL the info they've got. Youll get a lot more in that than from getting your standard credit report believe me I got over 2000 pages in mine.

 

As I said one step at a time.

 

Sparkie1723:cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you I will send them a cheques to all three CRA with the request and hold onto my mail box for the delivery. 3x2000 = alot of trees.:D

 

Thanxs Sparky i will keep in touch!

 

SB

SBFIDO

 

Accredited Member of the CIEH

 

No more will I be bullied or harassed.

 

When informed that the call is recorded for training and monitoring I always say I don't want it used for training. :razz:

 

I always ask for the ICO registration information - they often dont have it, shame i never discuss my personal data unless I know they comply with the DPA.

 

Finally I always record calls and state at the start of there call. Although I don't have too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...