Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

37 Excellent

About sbfido

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. The AA actually stepped up and sorted the issue out including recovery and repairs needed. Still watch my thread!
  2. Guess what arrived in the post, yet another letter stating they going to call. I am now ready with camera too. Will ask them to wait while i get wallet, on doorstep and call police to have them removed. FOOLISH PEOPLE.
  3. Served MMF with notice to with drawel access and prevent the doorstep collections. There response appears to claim they have the right to ignore it and alleged this is acceptable They state that i implied a creditor could talk to me, so therefore continuing. They then give notice that they will be calling if i don't call them....... Shame the notice i served has already been tested and they on a loser. An alleged debtor can remove right of implied access by serving a notice. This was endorsed by Lord Justice Donaldson in the case of Lambert v Roberts [1981] 72 Cr App R 2
  4. Halfords have today contacted in relation to the overcharging and mistakes on the invoice. A full refund of these and goodwill gesture has been accepted. This should have been resolved at the centre, however that is something that Halfords will address. The AA have jumped my premium up and this has arrived. Not so good after the service received and unless they match last years premium will find they loose another member to the RAC. (some £100 cheaper too). Enjoy all.
  5. Update: Halfords / AA now have admitted overcharging on this invoice. A refund on the three items I found has been offered. As they do not seem to have checked the other 12 items on the invoice I am now checking these the overage over charge is around 20-40% To add to the insult, my renewal from the AA has also landed, double the premium from last year. The car was adapted for a disabled child and was urgently required back, it would appear that the preferential rates offered by Halfords for AA customers would in fact cost you a lot more. Halfords have not even had
  6. Many thanks for the reply have sent the information to you. Have already spoke to AA customer services seems although they towed car to the recommended repairers and now they deducted the excess it nothing to do with you...... Sadly - I feel as you sorted the garage, paid the garage it has lots to do with the AA. Why are AA members charged more than it would be if i took it in and why have we been double charged excess. Feel there is some serious issues here. Is it because its a car adapted for a disabled person?
  7. I have everything with the aa, roadside relay onward travel and breakdown. Car is serviced regularly too. The car is adapted to carry a ventilated child, thus the reason for the over the top cover. We had to call them on Saturday as we traveled to pick our son up from the hospital, we also had another disabled child in the car. Response time 24 minutes. - Bike AA rider. Nice guy took 3 trips to the shop for parts to fix, Sadly not resolved. 1.5 hours now sat on main dual carriageway with no pavement. Relay arranged and AA gave choice, pay up front with a VAT registered
  8. Well is there a way we can make a joint complaint i am happy to use the none compliance of the Court Order
  9. Sadly the ICO and DPA have no real power to exervcise or lack of funds to sort issues out, feel that would be pointless, when CRA can get away with anything even in court as they are not the informaton provider you know the law is stacked in there favour.
  10. Does anyone know a good debt collecting company to visit lowells and ring them repeatedly lol. I would prefer someone from a service in india or china as the labour costs are better??? hehehe
  11. For the hard of reading as it is a scan IT IS ORDERED THAT:- 1. The Judgement against the first defendant be set aside. 2. The First defendant do pay the claimant (ME) the sun of: **** by +++ in full and final settlement of all matters exisiting or capable of existing between the first defendant and the claimant. 3. Upon complaince by the first defendant (Lowell) of paragraph 2 above the claim be discontinued in it entirity againt the first defendant. (they failed to comply with paragraph 2, but want the judgement set aside shame that lol) I am the claimant th
  12. Attached this to explain outcome. Sadly they were meant to pay within 14 days and failed too. So now going to see what i should do. (They have had 10 months to make it happen. [ATTACH=CONFIG]21320[/ATTACH]
  13. Yes just working out which is best approach for tribunal service.
  14. Still trying to get my head around all of this - I was elected as the ICE representative - Some staff from the region raised concerns with me over pay and Xmas Leave. As we worked 24/7 356 a year in one section of the organisation and some only work business hours. Xmas leave was always a contentious issue. Previously prior to 2008 all staff were given equal lieu days if other areas were closed for example Head offices shops ect closed) Social staff were given same amount of time back in lieu of working. In 2008 without consultation only social staff were not permitted the add
  15. Some more useful info although on here there is heaps too and you could get bogged down a bit. National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 16 How To Deal With Hire Purchase Debt
  • Create New...