Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card   An HM Armed Forces Veteran Card is a way to prove that you served in the UK armed forces. The card can make it quicker and easier to apply for support as a veteran. It’s free to apply. You can currently only apply for a Veteran Card if you have a UK address. Veterans who do not have a UK address will be able to apply later this year. READ MORE HERE: Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Apply for an armed forces veteran card to prove that you served in the UK armed forces.
    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
    • totally immaterial. time to now start reading up. Programmable Search Engine (google.com) Clickme^^^ do not miss your defence filing date no matter what dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scammed into paying for hire car insurance in Spain, Amex refunded - now EOS Solutions chasing 'debt'


Recommended Posts

Hi,

New to the site but many threads I have seen have some very useful feedback hoping for the same here for my predicament.

Long story short (sort of!),

I went to Spain for a few days last year and booked the hire car through Hertz Espana alongside my flight as part of a fly drive package. At the time, I also took out the additional car insurance that was offered. This is the type where you pay a deposit for the car and apply to the insurance company afterwards should any money be retained by the hire car company for any damages caused during my rental period. Happy days.

Upon collecting the car from the Car Hire kiosk at the airport, the customer services agent opened the conversation by asking whether I spoke Spanish, a fair question when visiting the country. I unfortunately can't speak the language much beyond 'Hi, bye, Thank you and 2 beers please'! My wife whom I usually travel with is fairly fluent so usually takes charge in this type of scenario but was already at the apartment as my visit was a last minute trip to join her for a few days of her longer expedition there.

The agent then went through the usual attempts to upsell and try to convince me that their insurance is much better than the one I had, and shown evidence of to the agent, because I wouldn't have to worry about applying to get the deposit back etc etc etc. I obviously rejected this as I already had insurance why would I take it out twice?

He then asked for a credit card for the deposit to which I asked if they took American Express. Not only did they but apparently unlocked better deals for cars in a higher bracket than mine! Good to know but not interested. Can't fault his desire to upsell. Declined this also because I booked the specific car as I was considering buying one in the UK and thought it a good opportunity to use it as an extended test drive. When he told me the amount he was putting on my credit card, it seemed low and I queried it with him and he confirmed it was definitely the deposit he was taking. The Agreement I had to sign for the car was in Spanish which also doubled up as the receipt of the card transaction. Gave me the keys and I was on my way.

Cut to 4 weeks later and I emailed Hertz to find out why they hadn't released my deposit yet and was wondering how long it would take. The car was hardly used and there was no damage on it so no requirement for them to withhold any, although you do hear of stories I was starting to get a bit concerned. They replied saying that I would need to contact American Express and find out from them when it was due to be released.

Upon contacting them, I was then informed that it had gone through as a sale instead of a hold so obviously wouldn't be released. I assumed the agent had made an error on the card machine and pressed the wrong button. After further investigation, I realised what had happened. I opened a dispute with American Express, sent them my story and all the evidence and they sided with my and gave me a charge back. Hertz tried to argue it but to no avail apparently. 

9 months later, I have received a phone call and a corresponding letter from a UK Debt Collection Office wanting the money. I have had nothing from Hertz saying the money was owed as thought that was the end of it once they failed to argue the charge back. I spoke to the Debt Collector over the phone and explained what had happened to them that it was obviously missed at the time as the agreement was in Spanish and was going on the word of the agent that it was only the deposit he was taking, to which they replied 'You shouldn't sign anything you don't understand'. Useful advice but nothing surprising as all they want is the money as they have no morals. 

The question I have is;

Do they have any legal right within the UK to escalate this any further?

I will fight it as far as I can but am aware how quickly costs can escalate when a debt collector is involved so don't want this to happen if I haven't got a leg to stand on as I signed the agreement including the receipt for the additional insurance, even if it was a scam and not what I was told it was.

Any help is greatly received.

All the advice I can find on Mr Google is regarding property not sure whether the legal process is the same for that as my issue. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A debt collector can do absolutely nothing.  For a start it's not even their debt.

Relax and ignore them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this. Words I was hoping to hear! The company in question (EOS Solutions) also buy debt so if they've done this, does that open any more legal avenues for them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the debt owner can take you to Court in the UK, but it is unlikely.  The amount involved is probably not enough for any company to take the risk of incurring costs that they might not get back.

County Court claim costs are restricted for such small claims.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Trigger1402 said:

but am aware how quickly costs can escalate when a debt collector is involved

A couple of quick legal lessons.  If you and I were in legal dispute I could sue you and you could sue me.  Your best mate couldn't sue me and my next door neighbour couldn't sue you because the dispute would have nothing to do with them.  It's the same for EOS.  They have no power.  It's not their debt.  Only Hertz Espana can sue you.  Not only do costs not escalate with a DCA but they can't do anything at all.

Secondly, anyone can send threatening letters to anyone else.  If I sent you a latter saying you owe me £100 because I don't like the style of shoes you're wearing today you would just laugh at it.  I'm sure you wouldn't consider it a debt or anything to worry about.  Thee same here.  Unless a judge in a county court has found against you after a court hearing you don't owe anything.

The only way you could be forced to pay this money is if the creditor sent you a Letter of Claim, then took you to court, after convinced the judge on the balance of probabilities that you had agreed to buy this insurance you didn't need even though American Express had investigated and found in your favour.  Not going to happen.

If a company buys a debt from another company then yes they can sue.

Can you please upload the letter redacted of your details?  It will most probably show Hertz Espana as EOS's client.  Plus, how much money are we talking about?

Edited by FTMDave
Incorrect info changed

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Scammed into paying for hire car insurance in Spain, Amex refunded - now EOS Solutions chasing 'debt'

thread title updated.

EOS don't by debts so must be chasing for their stated client who is?

bottom line is NO DCA is a BAILIFF

and have 

ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT it's type.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...