Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dx is wrong there. The reason they did the application with a hearing is likely that they had questions of the application that weren't answered in their wx. nothing to do with your N180 no they are just saying that they want the extension to make it 7.
    • its not a fine! it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge dx
    • Agreed, though I do think you should change your avatar to that anyway as most of your posting comes from that region anyway 🤣 At least it will liven up my interest in what must be the two most boring candidates for PM that I can ever remember 
    • I already phoned them.  It was for a parking fine submitted by CP Plus issued by solicitors DCB in 2022!  I'll ring again tomorrow and do as you said 😇 Hard to believe such a harmful thing as a CCJ can be issued when there's no proof of anything!!!
    • Apologies but this is the only info I have received through the post. I have not received any other PCN notification
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio arrear's and want to apply for SAAS postgraduate loan


Rubyblue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 108 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

if you go read like threads, then you will be better informed.

 

what action do you think you could or need to take? 

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a pretty anxious person, so every time I get a new letter, it sets off a panic.

 

I've read so many threads here and you've given me lots of advice over the past year, which I very much appreciate. 

 

I just want it dealt with. I worry that they'll somehow get me when our family is in crisis as we have very precarious jobs and my partner's health will always be in the balance.

 

What I've taken away from reading and your advice is:

 

1. I'm in Scotland, so you can't get a back door CCJ and they have my up to date address anyway.

2. They are unlikely to ever take this to court as they can get plenty money through their current processes of intimidation and lying.

3. If they did take me to court, it's your experience that they would.have no success.

3. When I reach the point that my loans would have been written off (in about 4 years), I'm still not clear what will happen. Will I have to live with this hanging over me forever?

4. I still can't figure out what the worse case scenario is, so it feels overwhelming. 

 

I'm also about to move house and it's my understanding I should let them know of this change in writing--is that right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah one of the worst case merchants..

there is nothing like that that can ever happen in these SLC situations.

ive not ever seen a single scottish slc claim anyway.

and even if there were it wouldn't be anything serious at all nor affect anything else like jobs family global financial status.

 

as for write off at age, jump that when you get there.

 

you must let ALL creditors/debt owners including the DVLA (X2 car+your licence) of your move , that means any type of credit or anything you last used/paid within say 7 yrs to be safe. even though you are in scotland.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm a total panic merchant so thanks for your patience!

I will change my address with them, and everyone else.

It's very very reassuring to have you say this will not affect my family's financial security.

Thanks so much for sharing your knowledge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i havent indicated that.

listen, your mental health issues are NOT AN EXCUSE to do stupid things, stop using it as one that controls yours and everyone elses life to detriment...wise up.

it simply results in you panicking and doing something you know you should not ...like ringing Erudio before came here.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah sorry, what have I misunderstood?

I thought you said that even if there was a SLC, 'it wouldn't be anything serious at all nor affect anything else like jobs family global financial status.'

I was reassured by that and said that I would update my address when I moved.

what have I got wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

that no-one has a crystal ball....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

again where have i said that...:noidea:

if you had done nothing in the first place, you might well have been in a better position now rather than having to back peddle and correct that 1st mistake you made putting you back in control.

 

sit on your hands, forget about it, till next deferral, yours is not the next move till then.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's what I said in post 80!

That I'm glad to be reassured that the worst case scenario of a SLC claim

"wouldn't be anything serious at all nor affect anything else like jobs family global financial status."

Thanks!

understood what you said in post 79 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm just wondering how this stands now...happy new year.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Erudio currently manage all my pre-1998 student loans.

I failed to defer during a period of extreme stress.

I've always been below the repayment threshold and Erudio have proof of this through backdated deferrals/payslips that I sent them.

I've followed advice here and continue to defer each year and they continue to tell me I'm in arrears and so I can't defer until I give them money.

I'm now thinking of applying for a postgraduate loan via the SAAS.

However, I can see from forums that this issue with Erdudio means I may not be eligible for an SAAS loan

. Does anyone have any information on this situation? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged for full history.

its a difficult one to call but it might be to your advantage to try, as it could get SAAS to act upon erudios continued refusal to allow you to defer which i think was wrong at the time.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erudio sent me sums of arrears and I continue to defer each year as I'm below the threshold.

They haven't deferred me.

I have them blocked on phone

haven't heard from them by phone.

thanks. I'll see how it goes, if I do decide to apply

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Erudio arrear's and want to apply for SAAS postgraduate loan
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...