Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Before you start this claim you need to have a lot more confidence in what you're doing which means that you need to understand the way forward in the principles involved more thoroughly. We will help you and you will probably get your money back but this is a self empowerment forum and so you have to do your bit as well. Please will you spend at least the next couple of days reading through the stories on this sub- forum. Try to understand them thoroughly. We have lots of stories very similar to yours but even those which are not similar, have principles in them which apply. In particular you need to read and understand the information in the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum. I know that you have been reading around here for the past couple of hours but it needs a lot more. You aren't in a huge hurry. Wait a few days before sending a letter of claim and also that needs some amendment as well. Come back here when you've done your reading and then we will have a look at your letter of claim and help you to refine it Also, please tell us the value of the laptop. Was it properly declared as a laptop – and was the value properly declared
    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Regular savings accounts are accounts designed for savers who put money aside every month and reward them with a generous interest rate.View the full article
    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
    • The date was 3 June. Get on MCOL now. The legal principle is that, even if you defence is late, if the other party hasn't requested judgement, then your defence takes priority and is accepted. You might be in time. When I say now I mean now.  Recently we had someone who was nine days' late and this was pointed out to them at 5:30pm.  They faffed around till 11pm.  When they went on MCOl they saw that judgement had been entered at 7pm. Every minute is vital. File the below standard defence if you still can - 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pro-Fit Windows & Doors Yeovil - Pro Aluminium Ltd - Voluntary Liquidations and Pheonixing to avoid repaying deposit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help us?

We paid nearly £9000 to a local company trading as 'Pro-fit Group' as the deposit for a conservatory. They never built, delivered it or it transpired even attempted to order it from their own suppliers.

After 5 months of waiting they agreed a full refund....which obviously we didn't get, so we followed Citizen Advices advice and obtained a CCJ. However they simply put one company 'Pro-Fit Windows & Doors (Yeovil) Limited Co No 05919612 into administration and pheonixed as Pro-Fit Windows and Doors LLP Co House No 0C378789.

As it happens they made us pay the deposit into another company called 'Pro Aluminium Ltd 10051025 which is currently showing at Companies House as to be struck off for non filing of accounts and to which our CCJ was against. There are also 'Pro-fit Green Energy - Co No 14403671' which shows as active and 'Pro-Trade' Ltd No 09656721 showing as dissolved.

I had always believed that if a Company Director had acted dishonestly then they could be pursued personally and their own assets seized, well this director, with his home featuring in Country house magazines with a full size football pitch in the back garden and the lovely cars and horses for his daughter seems untouchable.

The Insolvency Service, who amazingly state their purpose as creating trust in business, said they weren't interested. The Office of Fair Trading you can't contact anymore and the most helpful Insolvency Solicitors we have approached (most aren't interested or say they are too busy to take on any more work once you explain) have advised that they would anticipate £20,000+ for costs and advised it just isn't worth perusing. 

My wife who has cancer genuinely has had a breakdown over this and it just seems so incredibly wrong that people like this can get away with what to us is theft with absolute impunity.

Can anyone offer us any advice or direction please?

The total amount of the CCJ claim is for £9,587 which includes 8% interest and the Small Claims Court Fees. 

The quick background is that in June 2022 my wife and I ordered a conservatory from a company called Pro Fit Windows in Yeovil and paid a deposit of over £8000.  At that time my 87 year old father in law who was very frail was living with us in our small cottage and we had hoped to have the conservatory as an extra bright and airy room for him to sit in. He has since developed severe dementia and sadly had to go into a home this year so never got to sit in it.

The conservatory was supposed to be delivered within 8-10 weeks however we kept being advised that there were delays and problems with suppliers and parts arriving damaged etc and eventually we had a firm date at the beginning of November 2022. 

On that day we all stood around the concrete base and dwarf walls with our builder waiting for them to arrive when the builder received a call from them to say that they were not coming because the conservatory had never been ordered from their supplier! 

 I went to see them that day and eventually saw the owner Director. He explained it was all down to a particular staff member we had been dealing with who had been dismissed subsequently. That we could have a refund but that in fact the conservatory might be on a lorry they were currently unloading and failing that almost certainly on a container arriving in Plymouth that Monday (this was a Thursday afternoon) and that the conservatory might infact be with him for Tuesday the following week.

He promised to do everything he could to fix the situation and reschedule so I agreed to see what happened the following week. (It seems clear from the date of Insolvency of Pro-Fit Windows & Doors Yeovil Ltd in Dec 2022 he was deliberately stalling) 

It transpired the conservatory was not on the truck they were unloading and so not having heard anything I called on the Tuesday and was told that the conservatory was not in Plymouth however….while I could have a refund, to start again with another company would realistically take months however they had already contacted the manufacturer in Ireland, sorted everything out and it would be done in a week. I said if that was the case to continue.

A week later when I called for an update I was told by a member of staff that it had been ‘put back 2 weeks’ I asked what this meant and was told that the manufacturer would not process the order for another couple of weeks. I said that if they could assure me that the conservatory could be delivered and built before Christmas we could live with that but if that could not be achieved that we would like the refund. Their reply, by email, was that their accounts department would process the refund. 

 As I had lost all faith in them by that time, I kept an eye on the refund which failed to appear and contacted them by phone, email and in person. I got nowhere and never received a response. Eventually having spoken to Citizen’s advice I sent a letter giving 21 days notice. This was ignored. From this I applied for a CCJ for the debt through the Small Claims Court. During that process and to date I have not received any communication from Pro Fit whatsoever. I saw that we had paid Pro-Fit Aluminium Ltd and so had applied for the CCJ from them.

The Small Claims Unit were behind in their administration and the CCJ, which was issued on 20th February 2023.  

I kept an eye on ‘Pro-fit’ group and they remained actively trading and open, answered calls, had a website up.

As soon as I received the CCJ Certificate I attempted to appoint bailiffs, initially there was some confusion and I was advised that because the amount was over £5000 I needed to appoint High Court Enforcement Officers instead.

I went on the HCE Website and was surprised to find that the nearest HCE's were either in Bristol or Southampton and there were none within an hours drive of Yeovil. I plumped for the Bristol firm and contacted them. They advised that the CCJ needed to be transferred to the High Court for them to deal but would take on the case and try and help me get our money back.

It took about a month to come through and we waited with baited breath to see what would unfold and whether we might get some or all of our money back. And waited...and waited...we were told it was very difficult, we were told that they had been there and that a member of staff had said they were closing down.

We were told that they had inspected the premises and that there were clearly sufficient assets to seize to make it worthwhile to proceed and that they would be going in with men and vans and locksmiths. We were told it hadn't happened because they were busy with Gypsy's and they would try again..and eventually it became apparent that the Bailiff's were not going to do anything. Stunned at accepting they weren't going to help I complained as was offered our initial fee back.

Finally, a couple of months ago I went in to Pro-Fit when I was pretty much passing - I don't live in Yeovil or have much call to go there normally. Long story short the visit was not at all pleasant but I did leave with a copy of the Pro-Fit Windows and Doors Yeovil Insolvency.

And from there we just simply don't know what to do.

I want to move on in life but it is sickening to think they can get away with taking people's money and operating on shelf companies and pheonixing.

To my mind they are clearly sophisticated at it.

I just received notification that they moving from a Creditor's case to Voluntary Liquidation and that new Directors (a son) have been appointed buying the old company assets for peanuts and continuing to trade under pretty much the same banner.

Can anything be done?

We are not for sure (you can find other horrifying stories on the net about them) the only ones to have tales of woe and would hate for other people to fall prey to them?

Thanks for any advice you can give

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems like you've tried everything.

sadly this is a well trodden route rouge traders trick, there are 100's of car trader stories here of yea old phoenixing trick.

to date, i don't think one has ever been resolved.

sorry.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

start reading here

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something that doesn't seem to have been mentioned is how the deposit was paid, credit card, debit card, bank transfer?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Camino55 said:

It was a credit card but after going back to them

who is 'them'?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...