Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Auxillis is threatening to charge over £5,000 if don't sign client agreement form with Principia Law


The_Victim
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 428 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a car accident and I was not at fault. Admiral who was my insurance provider referred me to Auxillis for a credit hire vehicle. I thought Auxillis was Admiral's branch and by simply trusting them signed Auxillis documents without carefully reading them.

 

After my car was repaired I received a message from Auxillis that I have to sign a client agreement with Principia Law who is going to represent me in court as they could not recover charges from the third party. I was shocked when I called Admiral and they told me that after I signed an agreement with Auxillis it was nothing to do with them. I have paid insurance premium to Admiral and they simply washed their hands.

 

After reading Principia Law documents saying clearly that by signing the agreement all the financial obligations would be my responsibility as their client. I then contacted Auxillis and asked if the documents can be amended by making clear that credit protection still would be in force and would cover me while being Principia Law client. They simply ignored me and pointed me to their credit protection document which states that it covers only Auxillis customers. 

 

I refused to sign Principia Law client agreement. Later I have received a threatening letter from Auxillis stating that they would recover from me £5,125 if I don't sign the agreement. 

 

If I sign Principia Law agreement and they loose the court case, then do I have to pay their costs plus £5,125 ?

 

Can anyone help please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another person stitched up with credit hire.

 

If Admiral had explained this to you or you had asked for advice beforehand you would not have made mistake of using credit hire.

 

Of course third party Insurers don't want to pay credit hire of over £5k. Was this expense really necessary ? Could you have avoided needing a hire car for the number of days ? Could you have hired a more reasonably priced hire car for any days needed ?

 

Unfortunately, now you have signed with Auxillis, they need to go down the court route to recover the credit hire costs. If you don't agree some way of legally pursuing the hire costs, then you will owe Auxillis the £5k and they may take you to Court.

 

You need to resolve with Auxillis.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your comments.

However, I am now in the position where -- What is going to happen if I sign Principia Law agreement and Principia Law looses the court case?

Can I still be covered by Credit Protection insurance provided by Auxillis which is for Auxillis customers and not for Principia Law clients?

I would be very thankful if anyone can advise from their experience 

 

Edited by The_Victim
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to ask Auxillis about this and get them to confirm the exact position in writing.

 

No point relying on online forum comments to confirm anything in this case.  I agree with the way you are thinking on this and you need Auxillis to provide information in writing, so you can make a decision.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are numerous threads here on this scam.

 

you need to be VERY careful what you sign.

if you agree then YOU become the claimant against a big all powerful hire Company with them being able to hire Barristers at enormous costs, that if you lose you'll have to pay as well.

 

there are varying threads, some win some lose here.

 

this thread you might find interesting to read

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont need a solicitor

waste of money unless you have free legal cover with your motor or home ins.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, dx100uk said:

there are numerous threads here on this scam.

 

you need to be VERY careful what you sign.

if you agree then YOU become the claimant against a big all powerful hire Company with them being able to hire Barristers at enormous costs, that if you lose you'll have to pay as well.

 

there are varying threads, some win some lose here.

 

this thread you might find interesting to read

 

 

thank you! very interesting indeed, very similar to my situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...