Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Assault by security guard in co-op store


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 480 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband was grabbed from behind, and his fleece ripped, in a local Co-op store last month. The assault was reported online when we got home. A crime reference number was issued. 

 

I emailed the CEO of Co-op, who said security was subcontracted to Mitie. Mitie have said they and the guard are registered with the SIA, but an investigation by 'co-op team members' found nothing. They also said the  cctv belongs to co-op. I can't find the guard on the SIA register, I did take a photo of him before we left the store, and got his name badge for another place where he works as security (a hospital!).

 

Police have yet to take a statement, but have said the cctv shows his arm being grabbed. Although they said it's at the store entrance, actually he was well inside, and in any case, the security guard didn't identify himself.

 

Police seem reluctant to push the charges of assault and criminal damage (my husband had a bruised rib, and the sleeve of his fleece was half ripped off. So clearly he was pulled verty hard). Would my husband have to get a solicitor to access the cctv and potentially ask for a settlement prior to a private action against Mitie and their employee?

 

He's offered to go to the police station to make a statement and hand in his ripped fleece as evidence, he's awaiting a response. Mitie haven't responded after being informed last week that there is cctv footage, and sent a picture of the fleece.

 

I'm concerned the cctv will 'go missing' if we can't get hold of it soon. Had that happen years ago, when my then boyfriend was assaulted in a club by the bouncer. Police encouraged him  to make a statement, had the cctv - and then lost it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Assault by security guard in co-op store

Potentially your husband has a claim for trespass either against the supermarket or the security company.

You don't say when this has happened but he would certainly need to get a doctor to have a look at the injury that he has suffered and also he should have photographs of the bruising.

Obviously keep the coat untouched.

I think we need to know the entire story because you have simply talked about the injury and you have not talked about the circumstances leading up to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we walked in to see if there was anything worth getting for dinner, as we had 15 minutes before our train. Nothing in the reduced section, so we walked out. He was behind me, and had a half drunk water bottle in his pocket (the pockets are on the front of the fleece) both as we went in, and as we left.

 

Obviously, the security guard hadn't clocked this as we went in, but instead of stopping my husband, grabbed his arm from behind after he'd gone past, and nearly pulled him to the floor. My husband resisted, so didn’t quite fall over. That's probably when his fleece ripped. The guard then reached around into his pocket and found the M&S water bottle.

 

He did go to the doctor, but internal bruising isn't visible. This happened four weeks ago today, in S London, near my mum's, in the evening. We'd taken her, in her wheelchair, on the bus to a hospital appointment, and were heading home after taking her back to hers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you tell us something about the ethnicity of the security person and also your own ethnicity.

How soon after the incident did you go to the doctor?

What is the value of the damaged fleece?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also I find it very difficult to believe that there was no verbal exchange – although you haven't refer to one.

Please can you post up the dialogue which occurred

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only dialogue was well after he'd grabbed my husband. I think it was my husband calling out to me, then he said what do you think you're doing? After the guy was holding the (half empty) M&S water bottle, he said he'd made a mistake. There was no dialogue before the assault. 

Edited by wazir
Link to post
Share on other sites

Who said that they had made a mistake – was it the security person or your husband?

Also, you have enhanced the ethnicity and I can certainly understand if this was deliberate – but it would be helpful to have a sense of whether there was some stereotyping or profiling involved

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Could I also just add the Coop saying the security guard is employed by mitie they are sort of telling you the truth but not.

 

Yes the Security Guard is Employed by Mitie but it is the Coop that has Employed/Contracted the Services of Mitie to provide Security in that store so the Coop are responsible for the actions of the Security Company they Employed Mitie to carry out this Service on there behalf.                       

(them passing you to Mitie is wrong as the buck stops with Coop as they Employed them to carry out this Security Service in that store)

 

You don't need a solicitor to request CCTV you simply send the Coop/that specific Coop store a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting copies of the CCTV on XX/XX/2022 from time approx. Start Time to approx. Finish time and that this footage must be kept and not destroyed and that you also require "ALL DATA". Make sure those involved in this incident i.e your husband and yourself are named in the SAR request. ( they may ask you to provide photo ID to identify you from the CCTV Footage which you could just send with your SAR Request)

 

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your advice. Will SAR the Co-op, and point out they are legally responsible. 

 

My husband is white, the security guard is Asian, presumably Muslim, as the name on his NHS badge translates as 'gentle servant'! You gotta laugh. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 suggest that you post a draft of any letters that you are thinking of sending here before you you post it off

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've edited some of the works out of your post .

 

You have made the point without needing to go on to make additional comments.

 

Thanks 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the police ace have said they won't prosecute as 'it's a security guard doing his job'. On the phone. Asked them to put it in writing. Chasing that separately. 

 

Mitie are delaying responding to the SAR. They still haven't given the SIA number of the security guard.

 

Co-op have responded. I've got a cctv still of the guard grabbing my husband. Also a statement from Co-op staff saying my husband was assaulted, but 'that's a matter for Mitie'.

 

Given I have a statement from a Mitie director directly claiming the Co-op staff didn't say there was an assault (which was untrue), is it time to go to the Mitie CEO again, with the cctv still, with a notice prior to action? Or go to a solicitor and start formal proceedings?

 

Or wait until the police confirm in writing what they said on the phone. Not only did they say there was an assault but they wouldn't prosecute as it was only 'a security guard doing his job',but he wasn't wearing his SIA badge, as he must do when working.

 

Mitie haven't yet given his SIA number either, and I can't find him on the SIA Register using any combination of the names on his NHS security badge (presumably from his other job, he was wearing that, and I got a picture of it at the time).

 

There's also the question of Co-ops liability for their contracted out security. 

 

Thanks in advance for any advice.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...