Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, you should have applied for an immediate strike out as soon as the deadline expired. Without the agreement, they are stuffed Forget Barclaycard, Asset link is now the creditor, and it is down to them to provide the agreement.  That needs to go into the witness statement. They have not provided the agreement contrary to directions of the court and request the court strike out the claim as to the original court directions.
    • I did not receive a notice via post but in my claim status it shows my claim was transferred to a court I requested in my DQ, as it is closer to me.    Defense I filed:  1.       The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2.       The defendant paid the lead tenant a fixed sum monthly bill without fail for the extent of the rental period of the accommodation their contract was associated with who was responsible to make payments to the claimant, ending in June 2023. 3.       After moving out, a month later, the claimant wrote to state that an outstanding sum existed. Further stating, as one of the 10 tenants at the time, I now owed them the full sum instead of my 1/10 proportion of said debt, as 10 students were at the dwelling. They also intimated that they were legally allowed to charge me the full sum if the other renters were not to pay their share under some equal and joint severity rule. 4.       Despite sending numerous requests prior to the court claim being raised for copies of said bills for said utilities covered by the agreement, the claimant failed to send any clear bills. This included a CPR 31.14 on xx/xx/xxxx sent via post. 5.       The defendants stress that they acted in good faith to settle the outstanding balance, as evidenced by the confirmation received from the claimant.  Any subsequent demands for additional payments are unwarranted and contradict the claimant's previous acknowledgment of settlement. 6.       Pursuant to OFGEM code of back billing rules the alleged charges relate to charges which have not been billed correctly by Co-operative Energy and are therefore prevented from charging. With the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to: - a) show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement. b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed. c) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim. 7.As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation                  that the money is owed. 8.It is therefore denied that the defendant is indebted to the claimant as alleged or at all.
    • Paint is a free programme on any Windows PC. But don't worry, the choice here is not either perfection or nothing. As you say, use your scanner, save the file ... and then use the "choose files" option when you post to CAG to add the file. We can do all the redacting and converting to the correct file type at this end.  The important thing is just to get the info to us. Why not do an experiment this afternoon and see if the above works?  
    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Azzurro Claimform - Unregulated Business Loan from Liberis.com - Sole Trader - my name" T/A "Business Name


CornishRose
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 459 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Claim Form Dated: 16 September 2022.

 

Not sure what to do with this.   This relates to when I had a shop, over 2 years ago, which closed down in the pandemic. 

I think I was introduced via World Pay to Liberis, who gave small loans, and you paid it back via your World pay and your card machine.

I do not recall them saying it was unregulated  it was all done on line and phone. 

 

I remember vaguely speaking to them when I closed the shop, and telling them my predicament, but that was it. 

 

I have never received any paper work or letters.  Phone calls quite possibly, but I don't answer unknown callers. I have changed address several times since closing the shop, so quite possible missing letters. but have had the same address for over 18months and have never received any letters. 

 

As its classed as an unregulated loan, how would I proceed?

 

Thanks in advance. 

 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

The Claimant's claim is for the sum of £3518.25 being monies due from the Defendant to the Claimant under an unregulated agreement between the Defendant and Liberis and assigned to the Claimant. 

 

Notice of the assignment has been provided to the Defendant.

 

AND the Claimant claims the sum of £3518.25 together with interest accruing from the date of this application at the Statutory rate of 8.00%, which is a daily interest rate of £0.77 per day.

TOGETHER with the costs of this claim

The sum claimed above by C includes costs in the sum of £70.00 under the Late payment of Commercial Debts Act 1998, as detailed in previous correspondence to the D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Matters not it's unregulated.

 

Were you a sole trader or a ltd company?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Azzurro/Azzurro Law Claimform - Unregulated Sole Trader Liberis Business Loan agreement

did you sign a personal guarantee ?

 

assuming also that you did take this out in your business name and not in your own personal name?

there are several Liberis firms listed, do you know their address, but as they've sold this debt on to a debt buyer, this already sounds dodgy to me.

 

can you fill this out please:

DX

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which Court have you received the claim from ?  CC Business Centre, Northampton 

 

Name of the Claimant ?Azzurro Law Limited, Eastleigh, Hampshire

 

Date of issue – 16 September 2022     Reply by 17 October 2022

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.The Claimant's claim is for the sum of £3518.25 being monies due from the Defendant to the Claimant under an unregulated agreement between the Defendant and Liberis and assigned to the Claimant. 

 

2.Notice of the assignment has been provided to the Defendant.

 

3.AND the Claimant claims the sum of £3518.25 together with interest accruing from the date of this application at the Statutory rate of 8.00%, which is a daily interest rate of £0.77 per day.

TOGETHER with the costs of this claim

 

The sum claimed above by C includes costs in the sum of £70.00 under the Late payment of Commercial Debts Act 1998, as detailed in previous correspondence to the D

 

What is the total value of the claim?  £3518.25 + £70 = £3588.25

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?  not sure
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? yes
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  no

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? commercial loan, unregulated 
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? after
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?on line

 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?dont know

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. its been assigned
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? no
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  no
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?    not sure
 

Why did you cease payments?    Business closed in the pandemic 
 

What was the date of your last payment?      not sure 2020 sometime. 

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no 
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan?  I believe i did speak to the original lender at the time and told them I was unable to pay as the shop was closed. I didnt enter into any formal agreement with them. 

.......................

these were the original creditor

 

Liberis,
58 Wood Ln, White City
London
W12 7RZ

 

 

 

WWW.LIBERIS.COM

 

I dont recall signing a personal guarantee? and I dont think I have any documentation either, as it was all on email? Which I dont have anymore. 

 

It was in "my name" T/A "Business Name."..

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Azzurro/Azzurro Law Claimform - Unregulated Business Loan from Liberis.com - Sole Trader - my name" T/A "Business Name

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.
Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...
You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 then log in to the MCOL Website
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
[BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ]
click thru to the end
confirm and exit MCOL.
...

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt]
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

 type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.do not ever use or give an email
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] 18th oct by 4pm.

..............


 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

add in

copy of signed agreement

copy of signed personal guarantee.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, just to be certain, these are the documents I should be asking for?

 

1: the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.  

2: Notice of Assignment  

3: The Default Notice   ?

4: Statement of Account?   

5. Copy of signed personal guarantee 

 

Im not sure if I should be including No.s 3 and 4? as they are not in the Particulars of Claim?

 

Please can you advise. 

 

I have filled in AOS over at MCOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

send it anyway cant hurt.

 

they will have to  disclose everything in their WS anyway at disclosures stage

we dont see many business loan cases and many of the knowledgeable helpers are at this time not about for a while.

so we'll do our best till they return.

 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. 

 

Just some musings.  

 

I dont think Liberis asked for a personal guarantee....I found some info on their website. 

https://www.liberis.com/blog/transaction-based-financing-the-future-of-responsible-funding 

 

and also World pay say the same on their site. 

https://www.worldpaybusinessfinance.com/faq-s

If it had been a LTD co, then a PG would of been required. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Azzurro Claimform - Unregulated Business Loan from Liberis.com - Sole Trader - my name" T/A "Business Name

pers from day 1 , i think azzurro are flying a kite here,

 

it's a speculative robotclaim where no-one legal wise checks anything till if (ever) it gets infront of a judge.

 

they were hoping, as most of the claimants on some +750'000 speculative court claims each year do,

 

that you would wet yourself and cough up as soon as the claimform landed and contact them and get spoofed.

 

When as with all these speculative claims, once you scratch the surface, rather big holes appear in the validity of their claim.

 

think of it this way, why didn't the original creditor take you to court themselves and crush you, rather than sell it on for <10p=£1.

 

dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

OH no.....I should of filed a defense by the 16 October....I had written the date down wrong and thought it wasnt until 26 October....Help......

 

OK its 18 October, phew.....

 

Should I file a similar defense that I did before, for Kearns?

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 days in total . Where by the date on the claimform top right is ONE in the count .

 

Yes same as link but you can't reference the CCA bit 

 

Dx

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have deleted all references to CCA.

 

Please would you be kind enough to look over my defence.

 

Many many thanks.

 

CR

 

1.The Claimant's claim is for the sum of £3518.25 being monies due from the Defendant to the Claimant under an unregulated agreement between the Defendant and Liberis and assigned to the Claimant. 

 

2.Notice of the assignment has been provided to the Defendant.

 

3.AND the Claimant claims the sum of £3518.25 together with interest accruing from the date of this application at the Statutory rate of 8.00%, which is a daily interest rate of £0.77 per day.

TOGETHER with the costs of this claim

 

The sum claimed above by C includes costs in the sum of £70.00 under the Late payment of Commercial Debts Act 1998, as detailed in previous correspondence to the D

 

 

1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 
 
2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had in the past a contractual relationship with Liberis. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars. I do not recall the precise details or agreement and have sought verification from the claimant who has not complied with my requests for further information. 
 
 
3. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or 
Liberis. 
 
 
4. On the 02/10/2022 I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request. The claimant as yet to respond to this request.  Azzurro Law is as yet to respond in relation to the CPR 31.14 request.  To date, 18/10/2022, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 
 
 
5. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any 
evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the 
Claimant is put to strict proof to: 
 
 
(a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and 
 
(b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a 
default notice  

 
(c) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and 
 
(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under 
statute or equity to issue a claim; 
 
 
6. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 
  
 
7. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due 
to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act. 
 
 
8. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any 
relief. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

4. On the 02/10/2022 I requested information pertaining to this 
claim by way of a CPR 31.14 request. The claimant as yet to respond to this request.  

Azzurro Law is as yet to respond in relation to the CPR 31.14 request.  

To date, 18/10/2022, no documentation has been received. The claimant 
remains in default of my section 78 request. 

 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

lets have the directions questionnaire please

did this come from the court and is blank?

or 

is it from the fleecers and their copy of what they claim they have sent to the court?

 

what is the status of the claim on MCOL..

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

3 copies

yes to mediation (unless you filed our Statute Barred Defence OR this is a claim for a Private Parking Ticket)

1 wit you

Suitability for determination without a hearing? no (read all the posts in N180 link above for the reason)

the rest is obv

1 to the court

1 to sols (omit phone/sig/email)

1 for your file

 

dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

zero CCA/CPR returns yet?

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, back on 14 December 2022 my post. 

Ive attached what they sent me. 

Along with their snotty letter saying that I had copied a pro forma letter from the internet that wasnt applicable to me...as it is an unregulated loan etc...

 

So what is attached is all i have received. 

They say I have no way of winning as its a non regulated loan. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...