Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is a big improvement Dave and I do agree that it s best to leave it till the last moment to prevent VCS from countering your WS. [usually using doubtful logic that can't be easily argued against in a Court atmosphere] However my first post [no. 32] about the contract is the one that really exposes Jake's flummery and calls into  question jost how close he comes to committing perjury. And that is what hopefully VCS will not want questioned by a Judge. 
    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mill Motors Bedford Faulty 2nd Hand Car - Court Claim Issued **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 183 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Quote

I just want to check I can make a formal application to the court to withdraw & not have any sanction or costs imposed on me, if it's done in time?

You can submit a Notice of Discontinuance (no fee) to the court and defendant. As this is a small claims you are not liable for the defendants costs nor any sanctions.

 

WWW.GOV.UK
 
 
.

Use Form N279 to discontinue all or part of a claim or counterclaim. Send the completed form to the court and all other parties in the case.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both.

 

I appreciate the thought behind how I could lose £2250 against not paying the £181 but my concerns is that even if I go to trial & win, I'm not going to see anything. The company only exists on paper so my worry & what I am watching out for is that he goes into administration & I don't see a penny.

Today I received a letter from the court saying that the Notice of Allocation to the Defendant has been returned "Not known at the address given". Mine was dated the 22nd Feb, so I would assume his was sent out at the same time, so looking a the filing history in Companies House, he only changed address (back to his original one & the reg address of the new company) on 18th May. 

Where does that leave me, if I continue?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you pers name him as well as his trading name on the Claimform?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stated Mr X of Mill Motors. Both company & his names are listed as defendant.

So on hte notice of allocation it has

me       1st Claimant - me

Mill Motors      1st Defendant - Mr X

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you cant go wrong, you've named him personally.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

open

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Mill Motors Bedford Faulty 2nd Hand Car - Court Claim Issued **WON**

Thank you all for your help.

I won my case today, nearly a year to the day from when I sent my first letter.  They have 14 days to pay from when court sends out letter, which will probably be next week.

Two things now. First, how long do I wait until I instruct Court bailiff? Do the courts put all that in a letter?

Second, I still have the car. I asked the Judge what do I do with it & he suggested I email the Plaintiff and ask them to make arrangements to collect. I don't think they will come & collect, but how long can Legally give them?

 

Thanks again.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great news. Congratulations.

If you have a moment, it would be helpful if you could give us a summary of what happened. Did the other side turn up? What did they try to say? What did you say in response? What did the judge say? What questions that the judge ask? How did the judge some up in the end?

He said that the judge has given them 14 days to pay. You will have to wait until the expiry of that 14 days before you can start instructing bailiffs. What was the value of the claim? I expect it was more than £600 but I haven't looked through the thread.

Start researching the High Court enforcement officers because you should get the judgement transferred to the High Court for about 70 quid (which you will get back once it is enforced) and they will do the job for you. High Court enforcement officers (sheriffs) do serious enforcement whereas the county court bailiffs have limited powers and they are pussycats.


Also, the sheriffs generally speaking charge about two grand for enforcement which will have to be paid by the defendant. Make sure that the High Court enforcement service that you find is clear that it is no fee for you if the enforcement fails. This is the normal way it goes nowadays. But double check. That means that if the enforcement fails then your maximum exposure is about 70 quid. It would be about 50 quid or so anyway with the county court bailiffs.

You are asking how long you can get them to pick up the car. I would say that you put them on notice that the car has to be collected otherwise it will be sold.
I haven't looked at this thread. Is the car driveable? Have you been using it? Where is it now? Have you been insuring it? Have you incurred any expenses since you began the court action?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I see that you have been withholding the name of the person you have been selling. Please can you tell us who it is – and any other details including address et cetera.

It's important the other people and see this and it's important that this person realises that when they do this kind of thing they will find their name on the Internet.

There is no downside for you. There is no reason to protect him

Link to post
Share on other sites

The dealership is called Mill Motors LTD (in thread title) Mr Mohammad Adnan Rafi is the director & who sold me the car.

The dealership was at The Olde Watermill Shopping Village, Barton, Mill Ln, Faldo Rd, Barton-le-Clay MK45 4RF. Funnily enough, I’ve just gone to check something & found I’m blocked from Autotrader…Which is how I found the Kia.

I arrived at court approx. 30mins early. Mr Rafi wasn’t there & didn’t attend. I was called in to see the Judge, who suggested that he wasn’t sure if we could go ahead as the paperwork had been returned “Not known at this address”.

I advised the judge that I had been periodically checking companies house & noticed that the change of address happened in 18 May 2023, which meant the address I used was current on CH at the time the hearing pack was sent out in February. The pack wasn’t returned until 25 May 2023.

The Judge, who accessed companies house records, checked the filing history and saw that I was correct, that the address we used was the correct one registered on CH at the time the hearing pack was posted.

The judge then checked some information before saying that he was satisfied a judgement could be made as the address was correct and it seems that Mr Rafi was evading court which was supported by his non-attendance.  

He awarded me everything I claimed except the interest. He said although Small Claims Forms suggest a max of 8%, courts never agree it, so he advised 3% for 14 months, which still worked out a bit more than what I originally claimed (8% for 8mths).

£2250.00 – Car

£50.00 Diagnostic Report

£80 interest (8% x 14mths)

£297.00 court fees

Hearing lasted 20mins. Other than the address confirmation, I didn't have to say anything else.

The court will write & tell him he has 14 days to pay.

I asked about the car; he suggested I email Mr Rafi & tell him to come and collect it.

The car isn’t drivable. MOT was due 5th April and would never have passed, so it’s SORN, parked off road. I had to use it from when I bought it as I had nothing else to use. I had to minimise where I drove it. It’s now not insured, as I started looking for another car, which found and bought one I could afford in February. The only major expense was buying a new car (£9k) on finance.   

Edited by Flowertots
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should write to the defendant. Write to him at any address that he might have – in other words more than one copy of your letter – inform him of the judgement. Tell him that you are prepared to hang onto the car for another two weeks but you will be charging him £200 per week storage and in addition to that, you will be charging him a further £50 per week since the date the claim was issued.

Tell him that if he has not contacted you all made arrangements to remove the vehicle and to pay the storage fees at the end of two weeks that you will then make arrangements to sell the car and that you will reimbursing the money that you gain from the car after having deducted all monies owed to you. This would include the storage, and any of the judgements sum which has not been collected.

I suppose it is unlikely that you are going to recover your money from this guy. He is clearly a crook.
How much do you think the car is worth? At the end of two weeks it might be worth doing a calculation to find out whether it is worth spending the money getting it roadworthy and then selling it or just selling it as it is.

Congratulations on sticking it out. It's been a difficult road for you.

Anyway, put into the hands of the High Court enforcement officers. Do some of your own private research and see if you can find out where this guy is hiding.

Interesting that you have been blocked from auto Trader.

I suggest you send auto Trader an SAR. I think that you should try and find out what has happened. You know if this dealer is still using them?

Send them an SAR immediately. You may as well send them a copy of a utilities bill or something as evidence of your identity. They are entitled to ask that.

After that we will help you get the block removed and if they refuse then you can bring a little action against them as well for a bit of extra money.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

I sent a letter to all addresses in Co House, re judgement & collecting car. I advised £200pw storage charge & collection has to be by Thursday 5th Oct.

Yesterday, I received a call from Mr Rafi, telling me that he has fired his managers as he found out they were running his business into the ground & could I explained what had happened as he wasn't aware of anything...

He said he had found a couple of complaints & that he was working through them, he had no paperwork as the managers had binned it all & changed all his passwords...

I explained that I believed it was him who did the original transaction when I bought the car & that as director he should be well aware of what is going on with his business! 

I explained all proceeding from first email re refund, to court & judgement.

He offered to refund me what I paid for the car, I said that's not good enough & I want full judgement.

He asked me to email him my bank details, so I did with a copy of the judgement & said he would ring once payment had been made re collecting the car. 

He asked if it was drivable, I said he'd need a flatbed as it's been parked up for 8 months & has a flat tyre, flat battery & seized back wheel.

So, my question is, despite him calling me yesterday, I've received no money. It doesn't take long to do a bank transfer. Does my letter of contact to collect the car by 5th still hold up if I don't hear from him or receive any money by then?

Can legally send him an email Thursday and say that I will be selling / scrapping said car & deducting money from storage/liability as per letter?

I think he's trying to pull a fast one again by ringing to pacify me hoping I will delay bailiffs etc, maybe giving him a chance to get the judgement set aside?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't change your position at all. You have set out the terms and don't budge 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all, 

Sos for the delay in updating. I stuck to my guns & text him on the eve of the 4th. He said he will collect the car & do the transfer on the 5th. 

On the afternoon of the 5th, I had received my money in full & he collected the car.

Lastly, from what I can see, he has put the car back up for sale, but it had a proper MOT as in it had a fail - that had a majority of the faults I noted after I bought it -  then a pass. To what extent the works have been carried out, I don't know. Can't find company name to leave review.

 

Thanks you all for your help. As stressful as this has been, it was made easier by the knowledge of you all in this group.

Thank you.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much indeed for this update.

I'm very pleased that it was sorted out for you in the end.

I'm afraid that you're probably one of the lucky few who have these experiences with used-car dealers and then try to challenge them.

Hopefully others will see your thread and learn from your story as well

As you can imagine, we have expenses to pay and if you wanted to click our donation button, it wouldn't go unappreciated!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...