Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Include that in your witness statement along with that letter as an exhibit.
    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Accidently took friends student oyster card - 1 use, got caught on bus - TFL fare evasion letter now SPJ


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 527 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,


if someone can help me with my case with tfl.

 

 

few days ago I caught using student oyster card. Now I got letter asking me information with 3 options.

 

i reply to that letter on Provided email

I apologise and explained my situation that I’m allergic to dust and i start felling sort of breathing. As my medicine was at my home i left my friends house in rush and in rush i took his oyster.

 

When inspector came and check that time I realised i took it and touched wrong card.

 

I ask for paying fine the  amount and processing amount to avoid court to prevent criminal record.

I attached proof of my medicine which has my name on it.

And attached pdf from my gp showing high dust allergies. 
 

Its been 3 days now but I didn’t not get any reply back. 
 

I tried to find prosecution team contact number but I couldn’t find that number. 
 

if someone can help me what should I have to do now?  

Even I don’t know how to write letter to them as I’m new in this country.

Should I write letter in hand writing or in printed format?

 

help me please! I don’t want criminal record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have already sent you plea

then you wait.

they will write or email you.

check spam folders too.

 

nothing more you need to do until they reply.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a simple one off mistake.

Not sure what you are worried about.

 

You wont get a criminal record over a human mistake, poss a small OOC will resolve it, in most cases like these they might not do anything and let it go.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They dont have to reply.

They might not.

They have 6mts to move this fwd else it dies.

 

There have been a few cases of these honest mistake stoppages, whereby they just let it die as not necessary to pursue and never bothered to say we are letting it go.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on what happens when they review the usage on the card.

They can also review the footage from any body-worn camera from the revenue staff : would your breathing difficulties have been apparent (though I suspect they would have called an ambulance if they were that obvious….)

 

How many times might you have used it while suffering from allergy? Were there others beyond the time you got caught?

 

How many similar journeys were made by the legitimate owner of the card?

Edited by BazzaS
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

if you were stopped at the start of the journey, did they ask you where you were travelling to?

 

if at your destination: they’ll know where you travelled to and from.

 

Is that journey a usual one for the legitimate owner of the card, where it might look like you’ve made that same trip before,  or will your journey look “out of pattern” (supporting your statement to TfL that it was a one-off, if they check the card’s usage)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they check card usage Journey timing is out of pattern.

 

As the card owner using card everyday two times - one in morning and one in evening. But on that day journey happened on same route as card owner route but timing is afternoon. So timing is out of pattern.

 

Only 1 bus coming nearby the card owner house so route and bus is same. But destination is different on that day I caught.

 

They asked me where I was started the journey and where I’m willing to go.

 

Card owner travelling everyday same stop to take bus but end stop is totally opposite.

 

they stopped me on nearly destination of my journey.

I’m one stop away.

And I get off from the bus straight away. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The different timing / different destination helps support that this was a one-off, increasing the likelihood they’ll offer an administrative (“out of court”) settlement

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully They’ll settled OOC.

Right Now I’m just waiting for their Reply.

I’m ready to pay penalty fines and any administrative fees. 

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi, 

 

if anyone up there and help me. They didn’t reply me. But they sent me Single Justice procedure notice. It’s asking me to tell them whether I’m guilty or not. Making plea. Is there any chance that I can settled out of court?


What shuld I do? Should I submit plea or should I mail them apology letter again?

 

if anyone have any information how can I contact them via phone call or email?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should not have left this so long without chasing them up.

 

read this thread

 

it explains things 

 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Accidently took friends student oyster card - 1 use, got caught on bus - TFL fare evasion letter now SPJ

They replied my mail. And they told me this

 

 

Thank You for your email dated 13th October 2022. I am Transport for London (TfL)’s Prosecutor/Investigator. I have conducted a review of the decision to prosecute you. In conducting my review, I have had due regard to the CPS Code for Crown Prosecutors and in addition, the Transport for London Revenue Enforcement and Prosecutions Policy.

 

I note the personal circumstances you have described in relation to a conviction, however, it would be inappropriate for TfL to pursue a policy not to prosecute in certain types of situations which would lead to discriminatory policy for certain professionals as opposed to other members of the public. The fact that this may possibly have an effect on an individual is not a valid reason to exonerate an individual of an offence.

 

Whilst I appreciate the offer from you to pay our costs so as to avoid a criminal conviction, there is no legal justification to allow an individual to pay costs so as to avoid a criminal record, unless you can point me to the legality of your proposal. The offence committed does not require intent and it is down to the passenger to have taken all reasonable steps to avoid the commission of an offence, however as you know the court can give credence where necessary. 

 

In the circumstances I am satisfied that this case should proceed in accordance with our prosecution policy, therefore a plea should be entered into court accordingly by the date stated on the paperwork sent to you. (19th October 2022)

 

Your Sincerely

 

 

 

should i mail them again? Is there any chance they can change their mind.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plead guilty wanting to attend.

 

No judge is going to give you a criminal record for a human mistake.

 

keep pestering, and to the tfl officer there on the day.

 

just to be clear, thats a std reply from them, not 100% sure what is going on with their new no prisoners policy at present, but there are backwaters that have flooded that i know of and changes are a foot in terms of who and what is prosecuted coming...so my spy tells me.  

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rumour has it tfl prosecutions are being slimmed and only major fraudulent users will ever be referred to court in the future.  Most minor offences will be changing to a sliding scale FPN scheme.

 

Just about everyone that has attempted OOC has had the same letter, be it a one off mistake or 100 uses.  That doent make sence.

 

Dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone.

 

I submitted my plea on19th October. I didn’t get any decision letter yet. Today on 26th November I received further step notice letter from LCCC to pay the amount. The letter says following 

 

 

The amount you owe is £***.**

As you have failed to make payment as directed, you are hereby given notice that one or more of the following steps will be taken against you:

  • Issue a warrant of control to enforcement agents to take control of your goods (which will incur additional costs).
    Register the account in the Register of Judgments. Orders and Fines. (This may affect your ability to obtain credit).
  • Make an Attachment of Earnings Order (for deductions to be made from your salary).
  • Make an application for benefit deductions (for deductions to be made from your benefit).
  • Clamp, remove and sell your vehicle. (This will incur additional costs.)
  • Make an application to the High Court and/or the County Court to enforce the amount outstanding. (This may incur additional costs.)
  • If you move to a country in the European Union, apply to enforce the amount outstanding in that country.

Note: Other steps may be taken in accordance with regulations, including issuing a warrant for your arrest or increasing the fine by 50%.

If after steps have been taken the amount remains outstanding, the court may order that you are imprisoned for non-payment.

Payment in full of the amount stated above, within 10 working days from the date of this notice, will cancel any further action. Please contact this office immediately if you cannot pay as directed.

Appeal

You have a right to appeal to the Court against the Fines Officer's decision as set out in this notice. You must write to us stating you wish to appeal within 10 working days from the date of this notice. This is not a general appeal against conviction or sentence, but only against the Fines Officer's decision to enforce the amount in the way(s) set out in this notice.

Please mark all correspondence for the attention of the Fines Officer.

See reverse for details on how to pay.

Date: 20 November 2022

 

Please allow 5 days for any payment to reach your account.

- Or scan to pay

 

 

You will need to have your Division number *** and Account number ******** CG. Payments must be received on or before the date ordered

 

-By Phone:

Payments can be made 24 hours per day using credit or debit card (Visa, Mastercard or Maestro) by telephoning 0300 790 9901

You will need to have your Division number ** and Account number ******** CG. Payments must be received on or before the date ordered.

NOTE: Upon completion of your payment you will be given an authorisation number. You should keep this as proof of payment along with the date and amount paid. The court will not issue you with a receipt.

Note:

All payments must be made direct to HM Courts & Tribunals Service. Any payments made to any other party. including prosecutors or victims, may result in enforcement action as HM Courts & Tribunals Service will have no record of the payment. Amounts owed to other parties will be paid to them once the amount you have been ordered to pay has been paid to HM Courts & Tribunals Service.

There are a number of fraudulent websites that offer a service to pay your court fines, often with a discount.

Please be aware that the only way to pay your fine is via the official website, or using the payments telephone line, as above.

If you use any other service to pay a fine your account will not be credited with the payment, and you will still be liable to pay the debt. You may be liable to enforcement action for non-payment.

 

 

 

I don’t know the date of letter issued and if it’s 20th November I got letter today and paid amount today on 26th November. Is any action will be taken? 
 

what can I do to get decisions letter. As I don’t know that what was the decision. I tried to call on the number on, but it’s working only on Monday to Friday. 
 

 

please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...