Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Birmingham council Blue Badge fraud use - now magistrates date. **RESOLVED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My case has been transferred to Wolverhampton now as the court in Birmingham is closed. 
Im so worried about it, having no sleep and it’s constantly on my mind. 
If I’m fined I seriously don’t know how I’ll be able to pay it. I have no spare money 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well your union will know the way your particular school/academy trust has dealt with cases like this in the past better than we do but nevertheless dismissal cannot be automatic. The school will have to follow its staff disciplinary policy, so there must be a formal hearing at which you will be able to put forward mitigating circumstances and explain why you think you should not be dismissed. 

 

There's a vital role for your union at the hearing. A union representative, preferably from the regional office, should accompany you and put your case to the school. They should know what is most likely to persuade the school not to dismiss you. But as I said earlier in the thread dismissal may well be the outcome but is not inevitable. A primary headteacher friend of mine read this thread and commented that being a TA may make it marginally more likely that you keep your job than if you were a qualified teacher (because there are codes of professional conduct - the Teacher Standards - that apply to teachers but not TAs)

 

Even if you are not dismissed I'm afraid your plans to do a PGCE and qualify as a teacher almost certainly won't be possible. PGCE training institutions usually won't take on a student with a fraud conviction.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afarid it will. A fraud conviction will have to be disclosed and will affect whether motor insurers are willing to insure you and on what basis. And, before you ask, I don't know exactly what that will mean in practice.

 

Sorry, I feel like I'm being a constant bearer of bad news to you today, it will also have to be disclosed to your home insurer and is likely to affect that as well.

 

You might need to see a specialist insurance broker.

 

But let's see what what the court decides first. The sentence will indicate how serious a fraud they think it is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The period you have to disclose this conviction is laid down in the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act (ROA) and depends on the sentence. If it is dealt with by way of a fine you must disclose it for 12 months from the date of your conviction. If you are sentenced to a Community Order it must be disclosed for 12 months after the order ends. After that time you need not disclose it. However, although this will apply to insurance proposals, etc., there are some occupations and positions which are exempt from the ROA provisions and most positions in schools are among them. However, this is not straightforward and I'm not entirely sure of all the detail. As suggested, your union would be best placed to advise you.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...