Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/overdales claimform - old vanquis card debt out of nowhere***Claim Discontinued***


confused.com
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 681 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

But surely they were in default of the original request for a copy of the credit agreement so i shouldn't have court papers in the first place? Without the legal jargon it should be taken that a request of agreement with a £1 cheque be deemed as a request under S78 whether mentioned or not? You can't just sell the debt on and allow the next guy to take the fall?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes we know that.... but your not supposed to defend a claim in the eyes of a DCA then no one is the wiser.....even the judge.

Default judgments require no human intervention.

 

Welcome to the shady world of defunct debt buying.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to give you guys a quick update. Both the letters went off a week ago. Overdales in Bradford received and signed for the CPR the following day - haven't heard anything back yet.

 

Lowell portfolio in Leeds must have a redirection on because they received and signed for the CCA just yesterday via HARROW post office.

 

Still haven't received my DQ from the court either and looking on MCOL there's no change since I filed defence.

 

Waiting game.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK received DQ today to be returned by 01/10. Also got 2 nearly identical letters from Overdales just worded slightly different. Both acknowledge receipt of CPR and say as per there previous letter they request CCA from Vanquis and will provide it when they get it.

 

So for DQ what's the advice? Accept mediation and should I request hearing at my local court or via phone like they have done? Tia

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 wit you

yes to mediation

the rest is obv 

 

3 copies

1 to the court

1 to overdales (omit phone/sig/email)

1 for you files

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Another update guys. So I sent the DQ off last month but it's not showing received on MCOL yet so I will contact the court next week and make sure it's there or if they need another copy.

 

In the meantime Overdales have replied to the CPR apologising for the delay as it takes time to get documents from original creditor. They have provided me with a Digital signature application instead of agreement. Just a form with a couple of boxes with my info and saying approved.

 

Also a statement covering a couple of years that I didn't even ask for. Default notice and notice of assignment. They state once in receipt of remaining documents they will forward and as no response made to their without prejudice offers the client is willing to consider any reasonable proposals put forward.

 

Also Lowell themselves haven't responded to the CCA at all are now well into default time of over 12 days. No idea if they have cashed the postal order or not but they haven't returned it to me either. They have however gone onto my credit report and added the extra debt from the court claim onto the balance and made it so the credit limit shows increased from zero upto a limit and then now shows overlimit.

 

Does this all sound about right? Any next moves or should I just reply to Overdales stating they still haven't provided an agreement and Lowell are in default of CCA request and haven't returned the fee?

 

Tia

Edited by dx100uk
formatting/spacing only - no issue
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lowell/overdales claimform - old vanquis card debt out of nowhere

yours is not the next move

get that n180 sorted

ignore lowells/overdales.

 

scan up bar the statement all they have sent to one mass pdf please

read our upload guide carefully 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ring northants bulk

 

as for the paperwork thats not aceptable as a CCa return , its the usual A/C stuff they get from the vanquis data base. go lok at other vanquis claimform threads and you'll see.

 

the DN is ok

so is the NOA.

 

they rarely win these old vanquis card claims.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I figured the agreement pages were rubbish. They haven't even come as a CCA return but part of the CPR.

 

Lowell have ignored the CCA request it seems and just kept my postal order. Vanquis did the same years ago.

 

I have proof of delivery and postal order receipt this time though! I mean they do mention other documents will be forwarded when they get them but i'm assuming that to be a scare tactic. Thanks for advice

 

Court sorted. Apparently they are on a backlog and are opening post from 21st September just today so mine is a week still into that pile. She emailed me a blank and I returned it that way just to be safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

your name and address is nowhere to be seen

the supposed online? signup on a thursday 02 feb 2015 has no IP address of the device used. just some sticker at the end of a blank CCA/T&c's that could have come from anywhere inc uploads here or their filing cabinet not from vanquis to lowell....very dodgy.

 

they'll have a hardtime using that.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I see they are trying to pair it up with documents from the CPR (uploaded earlier). The number on bottom of that 'CCA' is what is in the box for terms and conditons on the other form.

 

No IP address anywhere to be found. 

 

Overdale letter states find enclosed copy credit agreement and T&C. You've now been provided with all the documents to substantiate our client's claim and they trust after considering the same I now accept i'm liable. 

 

They are still prepared to enter into settlement negotiation for 2500 over 12 months by consent order. If settlement is not reached they will proceed to court hearing which will incur further costs and fees.

 

Am I still best ignoring them and wait for court?

Edited by dx100uk
added A few blank lines only..dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep await the n157 from the court

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

open

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice. The letter received the case got transferred to the local court and 2 months later, letter received from overdales saying the client asked them to drop.

 

What's position on the charges they have added? Court fee plus solicitor costs now showing on my credit file on the alleged balance. I realise the alleged debt will still exist, but they have the right to add the court and solicitor fees to it ?

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

As they and all claimants do

 

Doesnt matter a monkeys.

 

Well done on your win

Well done CAG.

 

Please dont forget to donate to keep us here.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Lowell/overdales claimform - old vanquis card debt out of nowhere***Claim Discontinued***

Topic title updated...with regards to the legal fees added to the balance just keep a separate note safe of how much they added for future reference...then you can can deduct it should you ever feel the need to settle the account.

 

Well done 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you guys.

 

They just messed around with the credit score a little by increasing the balance after years and then making it look like I've recently gone over credit limit. Part and parcel of a vindictive leech company like Lowell I suppose though!

 

I'll buy you both a coffee once I get myself off prepay electric meter (another story that). Had shell turn up with warrant to fit smart meters that I'd always wanted anyway.

 

No paperwork to show though so I told them fit the smarts while they were here but I wasn't acknowledge that it was under a warrant so they can't charge me for some court fees unless they have the warrant right🤣. They haven't, but they put my electric on prepay for some reason over 400 debt but left the gas on credit... Thought it was the gas prices that went up?!

 

the losers said they will put it back on credit once I'm under 200 debt on the meter so I'm trying to get that down asap so I can go back on direct debit. Funny thing was they mixed up the gas and electric reading off the old meters and tried to bill me 3800 for about 20000 units of electric that came off the 2nd hand gas meter they fitted and never checked in 5 years! That bill quickly got replaced with 400 loaded to the electric meter and they just left the gas on credit cos I owe nothing. Go figure.

 

And sleep well knowing I've learnt some extra tips and will use this knowledge to help some other friends family and neighbours get away from these bloodsucker companies!! Big respect CAG

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you want clarity and help with the utils stuff , something doesn't sit right with the way you've described what they did.

start a topic in that forum.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...