Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
    • have a look at  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/451423-pra-letter-of-claim-old-barclaycard-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5256506 the docs in this thread are what you should get. if the agreement the correct date for signup and does the PRA or BC cover letter use the word reconstructed? dx
    • sounds like lesley. They'll respond some rubbish I'm sure.  
    • John Barnett had been giving a formal legal deposition against the plane manufacturer before his sudden death.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/overdales claimform - old vanquis card debt out of nowhere***Claim Discontinued***


confused.com
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 654 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening ladies and gents,

 

I am stumped by a sudden Northhampton CCJ claim from Lowell over a Vanquis credit card from over 4 years ago. I've probably done myself no favours either by not researching a lot before responding to court papers!

 

I received a court N1SDT claiming a debt to Vanquis but was legally assigned to Lowell portfolio I Ltd in 2019. This was the first i've heard from Lowell or Overdale solicitors representing them. I did a bit of research and realised there was some documents I should have received prior to a CCJ request and also that they haven't provided anything in the way of proof that I owe a debt.

 

i've already legitimately responded to the court papers saying I dispute the claim as it's the first i've heard from Lowell until the claim form and that I have not had a chance to request a copy of the credit agreement and would like to do so. I'm pretty sure it's the same Vanquis card where I sent them a prove it letter years ago and they disappeared.

 

They have responded a "without prejudice save as to costs" letter saying they receive a copy of my defence where I am disputing the claim on the grounds of not receiving any paperwork in respect of the claim and not had opportunity to request a copy of the credit agreement.

 

They then list a date of 05/2015 on or around account opening (inaccurate). Last payment in 02/2017 (inaccurate) and have requested documents from the original creditor and will forward them to me. I checked my credit report I see a Lowell debt with a default date 05/2018 nothing from Vanquis? Surely they wouldn't take 15 months to default a credit card? They have however been advised by Lowell to continue the court action and receive directions questionnaire which I have received today.

 

its a letter and a form saying they have agreed to mediation and would I like to settle direct they invite me to put forward a sensible offer.  The form doesn't even have the box ticked they want mediation. It doesn't tick yes or no to the small claims track. It simply says they request the venue of the hearing to me a telephone one which they will endeavour to arrange. The rest is blank/empty boxes.

 

What is my next best move? I don't think I kept a copy of the original prove it letter I sent to Vanquis nor can I find record they cashed my £1 cheque. I do remember telling them to delete my phone number from the records due to the sheer amount of phone calls they were bombarding me with. It seems like they complied and sold the debt to Lowell without informing me of anything.

 

TIA for help

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum.

 

Topic title updated.

 

Please read the following link which explains the process and then copy the Q,s and your responses back here for further advice.

 

Regards

 

Andy.

 

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

and pop up the defence you filed too please..

 

sounds like the std letter lowell send on all court claims after a defence is filed.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? The claim is for the sum of 2660 due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the CCA74 for a vanquis account with and an account number zzzzz. The defendant failed to maintain contractial agreement and a default notice was served under s.87(1) of CCA74 which has not been complied with. Debt was legally assigned to claiment 09/19 notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S69 of CCA84 at a rate of 8% per annum blah blah.

 

What is the total value of the claim? 3070
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Vanquis credit card
 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Lowell shows a debt shows but not matching any date they say the claim relates to
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Lowell debt purchaser
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No
 

Why did you cease payments? I couldn't afford the minimum payment due to family circumstances. They would just add charges and interest on and wind me up by phone every couple of days.
 

What was the date of your last payment? Lowell say 02/2017 but i'm unsure

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? I did send prove it letter to Vanquis years ago and they went away.
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? They never asked just rang every few days and asked for payments and more payments.

 

My defence was simply I have not received any papers relating to this claim from Lowell until this claim form. I have not had chance to contact them to request a copy of the credit agreement and would like to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks and a copy of your defence if you have it to hand. Do not complete the DQ just yet until we have had chance to digest all the above.

What date have you been informed to return the DQ ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My defence was posted at the bottom of the other post. My defence was simply I have not received any papers relating to this claim from Lowell until this claim form. I have not had chance to contact them to request a copy of the credit agreement and would like to do. I haven't received my copy of the DQ yet? I've received Lowells copy only as per the OP missing boxes and they want mediation or a settlement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoops I missed that Thought it was just a general comment. :roll:

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I probably messed up. I read stuff years ago about sending prove it letters but it's as far as I ever really got. Had no idea they can just sell a debt and someone else can come back years later with a CCJ without proof hoping to take a 3000 judgement on a debt they probably paid 300 for. Annoying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit late now but the following is an example the minimum we recommend when submitting a holding defence.

 

Defence

 

(1) The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature.The Defendant Accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

(2) Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings with XXXXXXX but do not recognise this specific account number or recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request.

 

(3) Paragraph 2 is noted. Although I have not retained a copy of it and I do not recall the precise details of the Default Notice I have requested a further copy from the claimant which they have yet to provide.

 

(4) Paragraph 3 is noted.  Although I have not retained a copy of it and I do not recall the precise details of the Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1) and therefore requested a further copy from the claimant which they have yet to provide.

 

(5) Paragraph 4 is denied, as they claimant has yet to fully comply.


(6) On receipt of the claim form, the Defendant sent a request by way of a section 78 pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974, for a copy of the agreement, the Claimant has complied and proved a copy of the alleged agreement.

 

(7) A further request made by via CPR 31.14 to the Claimants solicitor, requesting disclosure of documents on which the Claimant is basing their claim. The Claimant has not complied, but has stated a general extension of time to retrieve the documents, to date nothing has been received.

 

(8) It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(A) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and:

(B) Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for and:

(C) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to section 88 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and:

(D) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

(9) as per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

(10) On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has a right to lay claim due to contraventions of section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

(11)  By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant at this time is entitled to the relief.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Lowell CCJ court papers vanquis debt out of nowhere

Get a cca request and a cpr running asap?

 

 

if you use our enhanced google search box on this page

 

lowell claimform vanquis

 

Youll see 100's of like threads to get upto speed

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you haven't sent a cca request only a useless prove it letter.....????

 


..
get a CCA Request running to the claimant

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/

..

Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed

.

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt]
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

on BOTH type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

..............


 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date must you file the DQ  ?

 

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx100uk when I say prove it letter I meant a letter asking for a copy of the credit agreement with a £1 cheque. I never got a template or anything to do it i'd just read somewhere they had to stop chasing unless they could provide it. They never did but i've checked with bank this morning and the cheque was never cashed either. I'll do the proper template with a postal order to Lowell this time so I don't have to sign a cheque and recorded deliver it.

 

Andyorch i've no idea yet. I received Lowells DQ but haven't got my copy from the court yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help. I've done the template CCA request under S78 as it's a credit card and thats on it's way to Lowells 1st class recorded.

 

I've also done the template CPR request and sent by same to Overdales. I had to change the part where I haven't filed a defence yet because I have. But I checked the court claim online and nothing happened yet so I left in the part about it not yet being assigned to a track so will that be ok?

 

I also mentioned that I had asked Vanquis for the CCA some years ago but the request was ignored. They will probably say they never received it or can I prove a cheque was paid in or whatever which I can't but the main thing is it's off now recorded.

 

I suppose I just wait for my DQ to come from the court and any responses to come in from Lowell/Overdales and there's nothing else to do for now.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

brilliant you're now upto speed

read a few of those threads mind...

just remember that anything to vanquis previous is pretty immaterial now they've washed their hands of it., though of course could indicate why they sold it on...no CCA? 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

opps hit return too quick..

 

if you look at the other threads ...

you'll find their next move might well be their letter that for want of another explanation tries to intimidate you into agreeing a cosent/tomlin order as their case is sooo strong...don't fall for it, it's a std letter they send in every case,

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thanks to you and Andy i'm upto speed and less stressed.

 

Is there anything I can do about the weak defence I stupidly put in so fast? If I knew what I knew now i'd have said that Vanquis didn't supply the CCA so the debt was unenforceable from that point and asked them to stop proceedings.

 

When I said I never had chance to ask for the CCA I meant asking Lowell because I had no idea they had brought the debt.

 

Looking at the credit report it looks like they had it for years and Vanquis were probably already in the process of selling it when I put in my CCA to them they seem to have ignored it because they were already washing hands of it.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

your past dealing with vanquis re the CCA have no bearing upon the court claim no, other than a possible mention in your witness statement IF it ever gets that far.

 

it is certainly not any reason proceedings should not have been started nor continue.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was understanding that when I sent that request to vanquis years ago they should have ceased all activity on collection unless they proved the agreement first. Is that wrong?

 

Probably should have done it all recorded delivery but the burden is so much on us. Had no idea they could just ignore it, sell the debt and palm it off on some some other company to pursue years later!

 

The whole credit thing is a joke it tells me on creditkarma now that I need to take out a card to improve my rating 😴. I don't think so that's exactly how vanquis did me over 4 years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

since credit file data was allowed to be 'sold' many co's pay for the data and then bundle it with offers.

yes credit 'repair' loans/cards are a sad myth and only remotely useful if you've had no running credit before that shows you can manage money...

 

equifax, experian and i think credit karna? (was noddle?) are the only 3 main agencies 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure on that one creditkarma shows more data like date of default I've also registered on Clearscore and it shows very similar but not date of default. On both mine it shows a very shady history like Lowell took over the debt but it doesn't show the previous good history just blanks for the years I paid. All seems very underhand and of course both those websites encourage taking on new agreements to boost score.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

I was understanding that when I sent that request to vanquis years ago they should have ceased all activity on collection unless they proved the agreement first. Is that wrong?

 

Unfortunately completely wrong...they are allowed to continue to chase (if its not statute barred) but they cant enforce the agreement in court whilst in default of said request.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...