Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC seek repayment after Fast Tax Rebates Ltd take most of rebate


Schipoo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 149 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Shippoo,

 

Thanks and please keep reminding us here as necessary re the deadline.

 

Can you remind me, was there any signed agreement, acknowledgement or consent when you first contacted Maxwell/FTR.

 

If so, can you say what it was exactly and which post we can see it in (if it was posted earlier in the thread).

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have we see the exchange in the thread ?

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No….I offered but you said leave it for now. 
This was our very first contact email 

 

From: Allan Maxwell <[email protected]>

Sent: 14 January 2020 02:41

To: 

Subject: Fact Find 

 

Hi XXXX

Please complete and return 

 

What we need from you

Who introduced you ? 

Name

Full Address and postcode

Date you moved into your address

Date of birth

Clear copies of your 2017/18 and 2018/19 P60

Mobile number

National Insurance Number

Have you been self employed before Y/N

If yes

Do you have unique tax reference number  ?

Do you have a government gateway account ? if Yes

What is the gateway number and password 

 

Mr Allan Maxwell Esq.

Maxwells Accountancy Limited 

Corbridge Business Centre

Tinklers Yard 

Corbridge 

Northumberland 

NE45 5SB 

 

Mobile 07415 113397

Office 01434 634121 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks and, as I said, get back here to remind us - Monday will be good as long as you have an email address to reply to HMRC's Litigation team.

 

I reckon the deadline is actually Weds 10th Nov - 30 days from 11th October.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brad,

 

Read through the threads for Dixon and for Schipoo as they're both ahead of your case.

 

You should find good pointers in the threads but ask here if you're still unsure of what to do next.

 

Do you have copies all all exchanges (texts or emails) between you and FTR ?

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Schipoo,

 

I have already raised the points I think are relevant so I'll suggest a reply for you to send to HMRC tomorrow, 8th November.

 

If you have any points you think are relevant, post them here so I can consider them for inclusion.

 

 

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Working on it .........

 

Bear with me and I'll try to post a draft tonight.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Schipoo, Go through this carefully and ensure you agree with what I suggest, or amend it as necessary.

 

Dear [sir or madam],

 

I refer to your letter of 11th October and must raise the following points in response :-

 

1.     Under your heading Travel and Subsistence you say, “Without providing such information to your agent, I cannot see how it would be a reasonable expectation for you to conclude that any expense claims made on your behalf could be accurate.”

 

I used a tax specialist and assumed they knew what they were doing. You have seen the communications - I was told very little about what allowances were being claimed and had no reason to question what was being done.

 

2.     Under your heading Authorisation you say I engaged the agent, provided documents and information and accepted money from them. But it does not follow that I was happy with the arrangements – the simple truth is that I was told nothing about the refunds I received so had no idea of the amounts repaid by HMRC, or paid to me.

 

2.     Furthermore, under your heading Amount to be repaid you say, “You have been misled by the agent you engaged but did receive the agreed proportion of the repayment.”

 

This is wrong - I was not told about the amounts that were being reclaimed by the agent via my HMRC account and knew nothing of the percentages being paid to me.

 

3.     Under your heading The decision – EIS relief disallowed you refer to the relevant legislation, namely Section 157 ITA07 and Section 203 ITA07.

 

Regarding s.157 ITA07, were any share certificates provided by the agent to support the claim – if so, please provide copies to me. No copy was sent to me in response to my DSAR sent to HMRC.

 

Regarding s. 203 ITA07, you summarise saying, “…….  the company is required to submit forms to HMRC and HMRC needs to issue authorisation for compliance certificates to be issued to the investors, which enables any relief to be claimed.”

 

Please confirm if HMRC issued authorisation certificates for the EIS company for which tax relief was given and supply copies of any relevant documents submitted in respect of the relief claimed.

 

4.     If no such certificates were issued to the company or investors, surely HMRC was premature to allow such relief without sight of proof of investment, given the relatively rare nature of EIS relief claims.

 

5.    If the tax returns were submitted to HMRC by myself with no agent involved, why was HMRC so willing to make refunds to a nominated agent - did this not appear strange !

 

I appreciate that some of these points may not technically qualify as reasons to appeal the tax or delay payment thereof to HMRC. However, I feel HMRC are failing to acknowledge that we are both (myself and HMRC) victims of the fraud carried out by Maxwell/FTR Ltd, who used my Self Assessment account for their own purposes and financial gain.

 

Finally, I am most unhappy that your response effectively treats me as a knowing participant in the fraud, yet I see nothing about HMRC taking action against Maxwell/FTR Ltd who I believe are responsible for defrauding perhaps 20 other individuals that I now know of.

 

I continue to try and involve the police in this matter but they seem as unconcerned as HMRC in bringing the true perpetrators to account.

 

Yours faithfully,

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Schipoo,

 

No word from you but I'm hoping you got this letter fired off to HMRC already ?

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

yes I sent it on Tuesday,

 

however the link they sent me to log it onto didn’t work, I emailed it to my caseworker asking would she forward to correct department, said she couldn’t deal with it and was very awkward with me telling me to try again as that’s how it is submitted.

 

I told her that I had tried 3 times and screenshotted the error message.

She then told me I would have to ring the helpline. 
 

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't already done this, send a printed copy of your letter to :-

 

Solicitor's Office and Legal Services Reviews and Litigation

S1755 NEWCASTLE

NE98 1ZZ

 

Send it 1st Class (if you can, post it at a post office and get a free Certificate of Posting to keep) with a covering letter saying :-

 

Dear sir or madam,

 

I tried to email my reply to you using the link provided but this didn't work and the caseworker I contacted was unable/unwilling to help me at all.

 

I therefore now enclose a copy of my reply which I trust you will consider with regard to my case.

 

Yours faithfully

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have also sent another email today to Northumbria Police urging them to look into this case, see below

 

Hi

 
I am writing again because I have not received a response regarding this matter.
 
I called Northumbria police also and it seems you do not know anything about this case, but this isn’t what we are being told by Action Fraud and the NFIB.
 
There are many many people who have been scammed by this company who are based in Northumbria and this matter needs to be taken seriously.
 
I am at the tribunal stage with HMRC and don’t have much time left before they reach a final decision.
 
This is going to cripple me to repay the money Fast Tax Rebates Ltd have stolen by fraud. 
 
Please would someone come back to me ASAP it is now a matter of urgency. 
Edited by dx100uk
spacing
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Schipoo,

 

I've already said this several times to users here - improve your chance of NOT being ignored by visiting the police station in person and making a formal complaint with details about FTR Ltd and the people involved.

 

I'll come back about the letters from the Tribunal over the weekend.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Schipoo,

 

In the 2nd document above from HMCTS, it starts by referring to 3 items attached, namely :-

 

Appeal/Application

Respondant Decision Notice

Supporting Documents

 

I assume the 2nd item is the first PDF posted above but please confirm.

 

If there are any other documents, can you post them up, redacted.

 

I'm not experienced in this appeal tribunal process but we'll do all we can to support you. However, are you prepared to follow guidance, submit documents/replies in the manner we suggest and meet any deadlines. Please confirm.

 

At the risk of repeating myself, any joy yet in visiting the police ? Of all the issues likely to affect your case, I think this is crucial.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

there weren’t any attachments with either of the letters. 
Do I need to confirm back to them that I am happy to communicate via email?

I am happy for any guidance. 
 

Re the police, I’m no further forward. Local police refer to Northumbria Police and them to Action Fraud 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re the police, was this contact in person or by phone ?

 

Yes, you should reply confirming your email addy but I'm thinking also of possibly objecting to them deciding if they'll accept your "late appeal".

 

Bear with me but come back 3 or 4 days BEFORE the 14 day deadline so we don't miss it. I'll seek advice on this.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, slick132 said:

Re the police, was this contact in person or by phone ?

 

Yes, you should reply confirming your email addy but I'm thinking also of possibly objecting to them deciding if they'll accept your "late appeal".

 

Bear with me but come back 3 or 4 days BEFORE the 14 day deadline so we don't miss it. I'll seek advice on this.

I contacted the police via phone and email. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely a visit is worth trying seeing no other contact has worked so far.

 

 

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will do that this weekend. 
 

the email received today is a result of the letter I sent to the Solicitor's Office and Legal Services Reviews and Litigation on your recommendation.

 

What you suggest my response should be, and should it be the same response I give when replying to the tribunal emails?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...