Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parcel Hero + EVRi = Lost laptop - *** Successful Claim ****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Both parties must submit a witness statement ...hence you receiving the defendants " Any party that does not comply with the court directions risk their claim /defence being struck out "

 

I would get your statement filed and served sharp your already 3 days late.

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi all - update here for the record. I have a court date for Wednesday this week for the aforementioned case. I guess I’ll find out tomorrow whether or not I’ll have my day in court to examine the fairness of parcel insurance or whether they will settle. Keep you posted. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you post up the witness statement or skeleton arguement that you have filed

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the main body of the witness statement as requested: 

 

________________________

WITNESS STATEMENT
________________________

1.    I, XXX XXX of XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXX XXX am the Claimant in this claim. The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 

 

2.    On 26th February 2021 I sold a MacBook Pro laptop computer on eBay, for £1,625.00. I used ParcelHero’s shipping service in order to ship the parcel and selected EVRi next day service as it was offered as next day delivery, to be dropped off at a EVRi parcel shop location destined for an address in the United Kingdom. My expectation was that the parcel would be delivered on the next day as stated on the ParcelHero website.

 

3.    ParcelHero failed to deliver the item and subsequently informed me that the item had been lost in transit. ParcelHero have refused to compensate me in full for this loss and offered me a refund and credit of £15.00 which I rejected as any type of compensation. ParcelHero did not provide me with any evidence of investigation of the loss, the experience of which was incredibly stressful and distressing to me. 

 

4.    ParcelHero refuse to fully compensate me on the basis that I did not purchase their insurance cover when sending the item. I believe it to be unfair that ParcelHero expect their customers to insure items against their own failures as a service provider – or the potential negligence or criminality of the service provider. I believe it is the responsibility of ParcelHero to take appropriate insurances for their business operations, not me as their customer. Through losing my parcel in transit, I do not believe that ParcelHero have performed the contracted service with reasonable care and/or skill and are entirely responsible to compensate me for the full value of the item. 

 

5.    ParcelHero.com have a track record of refusing to compensate customers, whether insured or not, and poor customer service. Of 11,115 reviews of ParcelHero’s business on review website ‘trustpilot.com’, 20% of respondents categorised the service as ‘Bad’. Of these reviews, I have included, in exhibit A, a large number of reviews claiming that ParcelHero often refuse to compensate for loss, damage or theft of parcels, even when customers have purchased their insurance product. I believe this demonstrates a clear failure to discharge services effectively and a refusal to take accountability in the delivery of their services. 

 

6.    I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest believe in its truth.


Signed.

XXXX XXXX
 

Exhibit A - ParcelHero Reviews.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Parcel Hero + EVRi = Lost laptop

Dear Bankfodder and CAG team, 

 

Firstly, my sincere apologies for leaving the final checks on my case to the last minute - a major learning for me going through this process is that a lot can happen that is relevant to the case between the time one submits a witness statement and evidence to the court and the day of the trial. In my case, another judgement came to light which was highly likely to influence the outcome of case and I seriously risked missing out on being able to submit this by losing touch with the forums. 

 

Secondly, I'm pleased to say that my claim was successfully upheld at court yesterday - the judge agreed that ParcelHero's terms caused a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations under the contact under section 62 of the CRA 2015. The judge felt that ParcelHero's clause allowed non-performance of deliveries with very limited exposure. The judge was clear that, due to the fact I had stated the full value of the goods, the responsibility of the loss should sit with the supplier, ParcelHero. 

 

Finally - it's entirely thanks to this forum and BankFodder that I was able to educate myself and be armed to answer questions appropriately in court. Anyone reading this should give themselves plenty of time to prepare their court documents, be aware of the specific Consumer Rights Act clauses and be able to make the case, in their works. You don't need to be a lawyer to do this - the judge was really supportive - but you need to know what you are asking in order to be credible at court. 

 

Thanks again - I'm really happy to support anyone else who is in a similar situation and who, like me, has never been to court or worked through anything legal before. 

 

Cheers!

Martin 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much indeed for updating us and also thank you very much for this very helpful message.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • honeybee13 changed the title to Parcel Hero + EVRi = Lost laptop - ** RESOLVED :) **
  • AndyOrch changed the title to Parcel Hero + EVRi = Lost laptop - *** Successful Claim ****
  • 2 weeks later...

The transcript has been ordered and it should be available in the next couple of weeks or so.

 

 

Once we have it then you can be certain that we will give you access to it .

 

Have you located the other judgement which we have supplied .

I think it is posted up on that thread somewhere.

 

You should start planning your court bundle and also your witness statement/skeleton arguement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...