Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Consumer Credit Act update


gumbodave
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6577 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not sure if this has any major implications, but for your information.

 

 

Consumer Credit Act 2006

 

 

On Thursday 30th March 2006 the Consumer Credit Bill gained Royal Assent and is now the Consumer Credit Act 2006.

 

But what does this actually mean?

 

The Consumer Credit Act is the biggest overhaul of consumer legislation since 1974. The overall aim of the Act is to protect consumers and create a fairer and more competitive credit market. In doing so it introduces changes to the licensing of consumer credit businesses and additional powers to drive rogue traders out of the market.

 

Under the Act consumers will be entitled to:

 

· Take complaints about lenders to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

· Challenge unfair credit agreements in court. The current ‘extortionate credit’ test is replaced with a test based on ‘unfairness’.

· A new ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution’ scheme is introduced.

· Be entitled to receive more information about the state of their account to help identify potential problems before it is too late.

 

Some Questions:

 

How will the Act help consumers?

Consumers will be able to exercise their rights more effectively to challenge unfair conduct by lenders. Consumers will also receive better protection through the reformed licensing system and more information about the state of their account.

· Effective dispute resolution: If a consumer has complained to a consumer credit business and not received a satisfactory result, he or she will be able to make complaints to an Alternative Dispute Resolution scheme. This scheme will be run by the Financial Ombudsman Service – which already deals with certain financial services products – and will cover all consumer credit businesses. This is a quicker, cheaper and easier route than going to court.

· Challenging unfairness: The new unfair credit relationships test will provide consumers with a broad right to challenge unfair credit relationships in court. The court will have the power, if it finds that a relationship between a debtor or creditor is unfair, to remedy the unfairness by reopening the agreement or even setting it aside. The new test will also deter credit businesses from operating agreements unfairly, increasing competition and therefore hopefully raise standards across the industry.

· Informing consumers: Consumers will be kept informed of the status of their accounts throughout the life of their agreement. Lenders will be required to provide regular statements and information when there are problems, like going into arrears.

· Better protection: The OFT’s strengthened powers under the licensing regime will serve to keep rogues out of the market. This means that consumers can have confidence that the businesses they are dealing with meet the OFT’s required standard of fitness.

· Regulating all consumer credit: the Consumer Credit Act will regulate all consumer credit, unless specifically exempted. The only things that will be exempted are mortgages regulated by the Financial Services Authority under the Financial Services and Markets Act and certain transactions involving high net worth individuals. Business lending will not be regulated by the Act, except in very limited circumstances involving small transactions made by very small businesses.

How much will a consumer pay to resolve a dispute through the Financial Ombudsman Service?

Bringing a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service will be free to the consumer. If a consumer has complained to a consumer credit business and not received a satisfactory result, he or she will be able to make complaints to an Alternative Dispute Resolution scheme.

 

Will the Bill introduce maximum limits on interest rates for consumer credit?

 

No, the Government has decided not to introduce an interest rate ceiling on the basis of research by Policis (an independent company) on the effects of maximum limits interest rates in other countries. However, the Government will keep the decision not to introduce interest rate controls under tight review.

 

How will the Act tackle rouge lenders?

Businesses who provide credit or hire, or undertake certain credit-related activities must obtain a licence from the OFT.

The Bill strengthens the OFT’s powers to keep rogues out of the market, by enabling it to look forward to check that a business is competent to undertake credit business before awarding a licence.

The OFT will also have better powers to obtain information about licensees, and to impose requirements on a licensee if the OFT is dissatisfied with their conduct. If a requirement is breached OFT may also impose a financial penalty.

The changes in the Bill will also mean that lenders who are behaving badly are more exposed to consumer challenge through the new alternative dispute resolution scheme and the new unfair credit relationships test.

 

How will the Act benefit lenders?

 

· A more flexible licensing system with licences targeted at their particular area of business;

· A new indefinite licence removing the need for renewal.

· Reformed appeals system, where lenders can challenge decisions of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT).

 

Moreover, the OFT, which regulates the consumer credit industry, will also be given more effective powers to tackle issues with lenders quickly, and in proportion to the scale of the actual problem. This should enable the OFT to keep rouge traders out of the market.

 

The Act will cover all consumer credit agreements, at any amount. So the old financial limite of £25,000 is abolished.

 

Further Info including the full Act can be found at the DTI website:

http://www.dti.gov.uk/ccp/creditbill/

 

Fnancial-Ombudsman:

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6577 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...