Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

StepChange £150PCM DMP - Been Paying for 15yrs - all Old debts/scared and out of my depth


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1301 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please ignore panic merchants. I assure you as DX says BOI / Post office will NEVER take you to court. As for the rest,, perhaps you will receive a PAP, but then you can defend. That's why we always say, make sure that your creditors have your current address. 

 

Your chance of receiving a PAP from any of the remaining one's is pretty small, just make sure you open all your mail and run anything that arrives past us.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx and London! I feel so reassured by your words that clearly come from extensive knowledge gained from dealing with similar cases.
This is such a huge step for us and if it means that even just one of these debts is unenforceable will have been worth the uneasiness. I feel ready to put up a fight and not let these relic debts looming over us nearly two decades on. B:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bon-ee-bon

 

Some months ago I found out that a friend of mine was on a debt management plan.  I wrote to every one of his (10) creditors and not one could provide the original paperwork in support of the sums they were asking for and collecting on, and one even stated (and I was gobsmacked they would admit it) that the debt was unenforceable but would he mind paying it anyway ha ha!

 

He stopped paying and up to this point nothing has happened.

 

You should be clear about what is needed for them to be successful:

 

1. They have to deliver a Letter before Action which is required by the Court system.  It basically says pay the bill or they will take you to Court and usually comes from a Solicitor.   Any other document is just part of their Threatomatic system and can be ignored even though some of the letters can at first glance look serious.  (Any doubts come back on here).

 

2. Having delivered the LBA they can then go on to apply for a County Court Judgement.    The cheapest way to do this is by filling out a form on line and they will not upload or be able to provide any paperwork to support their claim at that point.

 

3.  You can easily defend against the claim by asking both the Solicitor and the Debt buyer to provide the paperwork to support the claim.   (95% of the time or more they can't do it because when they bought the debt it arrived as a line on a spreadsheet mixed in with a thousand other debts by email.  (10 out of 10 in my friends case 100%)).  They are running a numbers game and paid 10p in the £ for the entire value of the debts.  They only have to get around 10-15% of the money across the whole portfolio to be in profit.  Thanks to CAG and others the value of these debts is I suspect going down as they are getting less and less out of them due to people successfully defending them.

 

4. they might try one or two little tricks such as sending you blank documents and trying to persuade you that they have provided the evidence but in the main their case founders at that point.   (The one court case I have been involved with played out this way but I was steered through it by the guys hear at CAG).

 

5. If they do send a valid document it will likely be re-constituted and you will be able to a) challenge it's enforce ability for technical reasons and b) ask for an original at the Hearing which they will very likely not be able to provide.

 

So relax, because if you stick up for yourself they will likely back off and go after easier accounts on their system that are not fighting back.

 

The feeling of being in control and not being a victim or a cash cow is great.  Start to enjoy it!!

 

  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. That’s an incredible result. Well done!

Your friend is lucky to have you fighting their corner.


Pointless to say that I wish I had this knowledge years ago.

For a decade and a half we have accepted that these debts -which stopped us to try to become home owners or even dare to apply for a credit card- will be looming large over us until cleared.


I am so pleased to have found this oasis of hope generated by you remarkable people with such insight knowledge on this site


I am scared but also excited at the prospect of this leading to such a positive outcome as your friend’s.

 

I am bracing myself for the arsenal of tricks these people will throw at me.

 

Let’s see what happens. B:)x

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are numerous like stories already here in the same forum that your thread is in

might help you to scroll through a read a few.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/124-debt-management-and-debt-self-help/

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I have been, dx. Ever since discovering this place, I’ve been reading voraciously through pages and pages of people’s accounts . You could say I’m a bit obsessed with it. It’s been fuelling me for days.. lol😁

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 06/10/2020 at 12:08, Bon-ee-bon said:

I am bracing myself for the arsenal of tricks these people will throw at me.

 

Let’s see what happens. B:)x

There won’t be an arsenal of tricks, likely very little will happen aside from a few angry letters.

 

They can get crafty and try ringing from a

legitimate looking number, so that you pick up. I have to answer my phone because it’s possible that it could be a customer. If it’s a DCA I’m always polite and tell them I can’t give out information over the phone, and if it’s important to send it in writing .

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update:

following my letter to Link Financial advising them I will not pay any further due to lack of CCA, I received a response which says that they have placed the case on dispute and will be investigating and come back to me in the next 4 weeks.

 

No acknowledgment of my request to them to stop writing to me as they have no proof of the debt. 


I shall take this as a success nevertheless. 
I’m anxiously awaiting more replies from the rest of DCAs. 
😶

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

No acknowledgment of my request to them to stop writing to me as they have no proof of the debt. 

 

Seriously ? ....you expected them to agree and confirm :biggrin:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bon-ee-bon said:

following my letter to Link Financial advising them I will not pay any further due to lack of CCA

 

or sure where we ever said to send a pointless letter stating they have no cca ....buzz off?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...