Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the evidence you have from Mercedes is perfect. simply write to both the finance company and the dealership that sold you the car, stating under the consumer rights Act 2015 should a fault appear outside of 6mts, it's for the consumer to prove the fault was present at time of sale. Please find enclosed a copy of said report from Mercedes at XXXX stating quite clearly that the windscreen was replaced on Date , some xxx months/years BEFORE my purchase on DATE. there is a bill to pay of XXX to XXX , i expect you to sort this out between yourselves , i am not liable for this. something upon those lines anyway.  
    • Not really. I just wrote it based upon my credit file data with screenshots and stuff.  Also referring to multiple data points. You need to read before sending or writing it.    I have plenty of experience in this stuff so takes me half hour to write something like this. For you itll take an afternoon probably. An additional day with it on your CRA wont cause a problem.     Reference Material; ICO Credit File Guide - https://ico.org.uk/media/your-data-matters/documents/1282/credit-explained-dp- guidance.pdf ICO Main Page For Credit - https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/credit/ CMF Limitation Act 1980 - https://www.checkmyfile.com/articles/the-limitation-act-1980-and-debt-time-limits.htm Gov Limitations Act 1980 - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58/2023-11-18 (Latest Version) Transunion 6 Years - https://www.transunion.co.uk/consumer/credit-report-help/how-long-does-information-stay-on-my-credit-report-for Equifax 6 Years - https://help.equifax.co.uk/EquifaxOnlineHelp/s/article/Howlongdoesadefaultedorsettledaccountstayinmyreport Experian 6 Years - https://www.experian.co.uk/consumer/guides/defaults.html#:~:text=A default will stay on,you still%20owe%20them%20money
    • Thanks fkofilee , by any chance is there a templete for guidance that i could use to help me write the complaint?
    • Hi everyone,  There were many topics on this issue in the past. May I please have an update if anyone managed to buy or sell the house with the leasehold air space on it? would the bank lend the mortgage?  If I was not informed about the complications when selling the house. instead, they told me that this would add value to the house and sell faster which is the opposite. Can I file the case and dispute it for mis-sold and misrepresentation?  I am in the year 9th and I was not aware of the issue until I wanted to sell my house. There has been no communication since I signed the contract. The company has never contacted or updated me on how much energy the panels generated how much I used etc.    This is a free panel from the government schemes, run by  Freetricity.   Thank you   
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Your parking ticket may be unlawful


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I understand Red Routes enforcement in London is still the preserve of the Met Police & the issuers are proper traffic wardens hence the reference to "Officer" & not council revenue enhancement parking attendants. The Met Police Traffic Wardens CAN issue penalty notices as it IS still an offence to park on a Red Route the parking attendants can't.

 

In which case it cannot be a PCN. These can only be issued by Councils under DPE.

 

If it is issued by Plod/Traffic Warden, it must be an FPN

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 955
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi all,

This is my first post. Having spent many hours over two evenings to understand all the issues of PCN validity I am now quite confused. I have received a PCN recently from LB Brent. It does have two dates but no colour of the car and there is no signature of the parking attendant.

I would be obliged for your comments so that I can get me wording right.

Many thanks.

 

http://www.system-solutions.eu/front_ticket.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I received a PCN a little while ago, and i'm not sure if its worth contesting.

 

The ticket reads as follows - [omitted] - privacy reasons, they are present on the ticket

 

PCN Number: [omitted]

Date of Issue 04/11/2006

Vehicle Registration: [omitted]

Make: Volkswagen

Colour: Red

 

Seen In Old Manor Car Park

at 13:06 on 04/11/2006

 

Parking attendant 797 has reasonable cause to believe that a Penalty Charge has been incurred because the vehicle was parked in a pay and display car park without clearkly displaying a valid pay and display ticket.

 

Is this valid?

 

Does it require Date on Convention on the ticket to be lawful, or is Seen in adequate?

 

Thanks

 

-note-

 

Also, the parking ticket is also unsigned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

This is my first post. Having spent many hours over two evenings to understand all the issues of PCN validity I am now quite confused. I have received a PCN recently from LB Brent. It does have two dates but no colour of the car and there is no signature of the parking attendant.

I would be obliged for your comments so that I can get me wording right.

Many thanks.

 

http://www.system-solutions.eu/front_ticket.jpg

 

Your PCN appears to comply with the RTA 1991. The colour of the car and the signature are not required by the RTA. The guidance issued to councils however indicated that it should be included. The chances of winning on that basis are a bit thin.

 

Have a good look at the road markings and make sure they are complient. I havnt found one that is yet !!

7 actions in progress

 

amount refunded so far £6500

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I received a PCN a little while ago, and i'm not sure if its worth contesting.

 

The ticket reads as follows - [omitted] - privacy reasons, they are present on the ticket

 

PCN Number: [omitted]

Date of Issue 04/11/2006

Vehicle Registration: [omitted]

Make: Volkswagen

Colour: Red

 

Seen In Old Manor Car Park

at 13:06 on 04/11/2006

 

Parking attendant 797 has reasonable cause to believe that a Penalty Charge has been incurred because the vehicle was parked in a pay and display car park without clearkly displaying a valid pay and display ticket.

 

Is this valid?

 

Does it require Date on Convention on the ticket to be lawful, or is Seen in adequate?

 

Thanks

 

-note-

 

Also, the parking ticket is also unsigned.

 

I think your going to struggle with that one. The main issue around dates it is must have two. Yours does.

 

How is the period for payment described !!

7 actions in progress

 

amount refunded so far £6500

Link to post
Share on other sites

KZ. This is not about whether the PCN is valid it is a private company so non of the Road traffic Act applies. If you do nothing you will get a letter from this company demanding the money. They will then threaten you with all sorts but there is nothing they can legally do. The alleged contract is with the driver not the registered owner so unless you tell them you were driving theres no way they can prove it. The only way they can legally try and enforce this is through a county court and then only if they can identify the driver. Which they cant.

 

When you get the Notice to owner from this company come back on the site and someone will advice you on what to do. Be aware that they will threaten you with collection firms, courts etc etc but they are empty threats.

 

hi, new user hear and need some info fast!

 

I have been issued with a £75 parking fine by UKCPS in Leeds. I have sent off a cheque today (pm) for the full amount as it stated on the back that they would add charges of £3 per day if the amount was not paid by 10days. It has also stated that they will aquire my details from the DVLA to pursue payment requests and ultimatly court proceedings and costs will apply if not paid.

 

What do I do? Do i cancel the cheque and sit tight, or do I laeve this one alone. I've read a few posts but none were that clear, apart fro the quote above, about private companies...

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have noticed it does not state 'date of issue' but does that still count for private parking penalty companies???

The ticket as printed states the following, they do cover so many things which is why i sent the cheque...

 

 

 

 

PART 1

 

Issue Number XXXX

Registration: XXXXXX

Date: 26.11.06

Time: 2056

Time first Observed (if applicable):2046

 

Vehicle Details & Location:

 

Vehicle Make: Peugeot

Colour: Grey

Location: XXXXXX

Issued by: Gary

 

Resons for issue: Observed parking without a valid permit or authrority

PART 2 is payments section which notes the +£3 per day charges after 10 days, payment address, cheques and postal orders accepted (no phone payment facility!) Cheques and postal orders must be crossed and i am to write my name, address and Cr reg on reverse of cheque. A receipt will then be issued.

 

PART 3

 

Late Payments: 'if no payment is made within 10 days, vehicle ownership will be obtained from the DVLA, a letter requesting payment will be issued to the registered keeper and a £3 per day charge will come into force. Failure to pay will result in court action being taken agaist you. Coulrt costs and bailiffs costs will be added to the final sum owed.'

 

:eek: (Can they do that?????)

 

PART 4

 

DVLA

 

UKCPS Ltd adheres to the DVLA code of practice for the collection and processing of data.

 

PART 5

 

ADMINISTRATION

 

This parking ticket has been issued lawfully and the collection procedure is prossesed in accordance with the administartion of justice act 1970

 

PART 6

 

DATA PROTECTION

 

the DVLA will be granted access to the UKCPS Ltd data processing office to check the data processing procedures. All reconrds are available as required of the DVLA to be satisfied that all data is used as agreed to insure security of storage and access to compy witht he data protection act 1998.

 

PART 7 refers to police action

 

PART 8

 

LAWFUL ISSUE

 

This parking penalty charge has been issued lawfully. A number of gonvernment organisations operate a wrokign code of practice to which UKCPS Ltd adheres.

To ensure lawful and wthical practiece, such organisations are welcome to asses and review operational procedures.

 

PART 9

 

LAWFUL ISSUE

 

Due to legal procedures it is difficult for UKCPS Ltd to submit verbal evidence beofre court. We therefore regret we are unable to enter into verbal communication. If you need to conact us please do so in writing and allow 14 days for a reply.

 

PART 10

 

REPRESENTATION

 

If you wish to appeal against this parking penalty charge, please state your case within 7 days from issue. Payment must be inclosed with your correspondence. if your appeak is successful your moneywill be refunded in full. Withholding payment whilst in dispute will result in your costs increasing, please allow 14 days for a reply.

 

UKCPS Ltd registered in England Company Number: 5090613

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was issued with a parking fine from Leeds City Coucil on Sunday where i was parkied in a Taxi bay.

 

It states my car was 'seen in BRIGGATE by Parking attendant XXXX who has reson to believe that a penalty charge is payable with respect to the vehicle on the following grounds:

 

23 Parked in a parking place or area not designated for that class of vehicle'

 

it dows state 'date of contravention and time' and is signed also...

 

what are the chances of me appealing against this?

 

I have been give x2 from LCC in 2 weeks and one form UKCPS a total of £135 and this is when i come to work!! :-x I'd be better off on the dole io think and gettin the bus lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact Neal heron regarding your leeds tickets. I believe he is on their case. The link is as follows

 

Neil Herron

 

Re UKcps ticket the advice I gave earlier equally applies to them. All the issue with dates etc etc does not apply as it isnt issued under the Road traffic Act 1991. Have a look on the Pepipoo web site (Link on earlier post) Its got lots regarding these sort of companies.

 

regarding cancelling the cheque. I would if It was me but thats entirely your decision. It will probably cost you £10 and you will have to give your bank a valid reason. I would also make sure the cheque is returned to you as I wouldnt be comfortable with them having my bank details.

7 actions in progress

 

amount refunded so far £6500

Link to post
Share on other sites

These T&C's are deliberatly designed to worry you into paying. I would be interested to see what the "police action" that is referred to in part 7 amounts to!

 

If it's not a police-issued ticket then the police have nothing to do with it; it's a civil matter and the police will (or should) tell you that if you ask them.

 

It really is time that this was sorted out because the stress and worry it causes people is far more important than the financial aspect, and this isn't being addressed. It doesn't fall too far short of "demanding money with menaces" in my opinion, it's a disgrace and something has to be done..

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, new user hear and need some info fast!

 

I have been issued with a £75 parking fine by UKCPS in Leeds. I have sent off a cheque today (pm) for the full amount as it stated on the back that they would add charges of £3 per day if the amount was not paid by 10days. It has also stated that they will aquire my details from the DVLA to pursue payment requests and ultimatly court proceedings and costs will apply if not paid.

 

What do I do? Do i cancel the cheque and sit tight, or do I laeve this one alone. I've read a few posts but none were that clear, apart fro the quote above, about private companies...

 

Cheers!

 

Start with a look at the DVLA website. Google search for: DVLA, Voluntary Code of Practice for Private Car Parking Enforcement. This may give you some hints where UKCPS is going wrong.

 

I had a Charge Notice from CP Plus Limited in a Super Market parking lot in London in 2003. It was enclosed a plastic sleeve with the writing:

 

PARKING NOTICE ENCLOSED

WARNING

IT IS AN OFFENCE FOR ANY PERSON

OTHER THAN THE DRIVER TO

REMOVE THIS NOTICE.

 

You may ask what is wrong with this? CP Plus Ltd is using plastic sleeves for parking tickets to be issued under the RTA 1991. Therefor giving the impression to act with the powers of local government. It is unlawful for private companies to act as if they have enfocement power under the RTA 1991. It's a bit like impersonnating the police. I wrote a letter to CP Plus pointing this out and have never heard from them again.

 

Those private parking enforcement companies are just hired bullies.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Start with a look at the DVLA website. Google search for: DVLA, Voluntary Code of Practice for Private Car Parking Enforcement. This may give you some hints where UKCPS is going wrong.

 

I had a Charge Notice from CP Plus Limited in a Super Market parking lot in London in 2003. It was enclosed a plastic sleeve with the writing:

 

PARKING NOTICE ENCLOSED

WARNING

IT IS AN OFFENCE FOR ANY PERSON

OTHER THAN THE DRIVER TO

REMOVE THIS NOTICE.

 

You may ask what is wrong with this? CP Plus Ltd is using plastic sleeves for parking tickets to be issued under the RTA 1991. Therefor giving the impression to act with the powers of local government. It is unlawful for private companies to act as if they have enfocement power under the RTA 1991. It's a bit like impersonnating the police. I wrote a letter to CP Plus pointing this out and have never heard from them again.

 

Those private parking enforcement companies are just hired bullies.

 

Hope this helps.

 

My ticket says

 

PARKING PENALTY CHARGE

UNAUTHORISED REMOVEAL OR INTERFERENCE IS AN OFFENCE

 

and it's in a big fat yellow box!

you don't happen to have a copy of your lette still do you, I might try and get them on those grounds.

 

I have checked the DVLA Code of Priactice for Private Car parking Enforcement and from what i can see, they have covered their backs with this although i'm going to check the signs and make sure everything outside is legit!

 

thanks for you comments guys, much appreciated. :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

My ticket says

 

PARKING PENALTY CHARGE

UNAUTHORISED REMOVEAL OR INTERFERENCE IS AN OFFENCE

 

and it's in a big fat yellow box!

you don't happen to have a copy of your lette still do you, I might try and get them on those grounds.

 

I have checked the DVLA Code of Priactice for Private Car parking Enforcement and from what i can see, they have covered their backs with this although i'm going to check the signs and make sure everything outside is legit!

 

thanks for you comments guys, much appreciated. :cool:

 

Hi Cybora

 

It is NOT an offence! Just as them in your letter which law they are referring to.

 

Unless this private enforcement operator is contracted by the local council to enforce parking restrictions on behalf of the council they are well out of order for assuming legal powers they do not have.

 

Here is the relevant extract from the DVLA Voluntary Code of Practice for Private Car Parking Enforcement:

 

"3.3. Company titles, documentation and notices issued in respect of parking violations should not create the impression that action is being taken on behalf of a public body."

 

My gut feeling is that they will not be able to enforce this penalty charge. I would fight this one on principle. Also, do remember that this is a civil case. I.e. before they can force you to pay up they must present this to a court of law such the small claims court where you will have a chance to defend your self. So, don't give in to their bullying.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for your help KHB,

 

I have started to write a letter and have also noticed on my ticket that they have printed my car reg wrong. i have pointed this out but should i include the correct reg or let them search me with their 'granted access' to DVLA data? I can send you a copy of the letter if you like... :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

what are the chances of me getting off with one issued by Leeds City COuncil that was issued to me while parked in a taxi bay thing?

 

You would think i would find some where else to park would you! lol :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

what are the chances of me getting off with one issued by Leeds City COuncil that was issued to me while parked in a taxi bay thing?

 

You would think i would find some where else to park would you! lol :rolleyes:

 

You have to be either careless or pretty desperate to park in a taxi pay. I think you wil find it quite difficult to get off this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what are the chances of me getting off with one issued by Leeds City COuncil that was issued to me while parked in a taxi bay thing?

 

You would think i would find some where else to park would you! lol :rolleyes:

 

Im at risk of repeating myself here but neil Heron of metric Martyers is fighting tickets issued by Leeds.

 

He may be able to save you 30 quid

 

Neil Herron

7 actions in progress

 

amount refunded so far £6500

Link to post
Share on other sites

what are the chances of me getting off with one issued by Leeds City COuncil that was issued to me while parked in a taxi bay thing?

 

You would think i would find some where else to park would you! lol :rolleyes:

 

Why were you parked in a taxi bay? If it was an emergency, some councils offer leniency if you write in - the sort of thing that would count would be pulling over to attend a sick child...someone I know was let off because they were dropping off a disabled passenger for an emergency medical appointment [and could prove it]. (:))

 

However, if you just parked there because you couldn't find a space anywhere else and are trying to dodge it... not liked on here...(:evil:)

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had had a civil penalty charge notice put on my car last night in Hereford. I was\parked in a private car park and did not park in a designated parking bay, along with other cars as it was a theater car park and it was full up. My ticket says i have breached the contract code and they have fined me 80 quid, should i pay up or is it worth writing a letter?

1290 back from the Halifax have it you scumbags

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Anyone out there understand the law on parking fines when it's the police dishing out the ticket instead of a council parking attendant?

 

I was parked for a few minutes in a loading bay and when I got back to my car, there was a police traffic warden a few cars away. She wasn't writing a ticket or anything, she was just chatting to some women. So I got back in my car and reversed in order to pull away. By the time I was pulling away she had come round and was banging on the side door saying "sir, sir". So I lowered the window, said "sorry", and drove off cafefully. She got my address and ultimately phone number and phoned me and said I have 2 alternatives . ., 1. Come to the police station and accept a fixed penalty notice for parking ilegally and driving away from a police officer (£30.00), or 2. go to court - for the same two "offences". She said she has 2 witnesses, obviously the 2 old women she was chatting to. If it was a parking attendant I would have been within my rights to drive off - and in fact that is what I thought was the case. Anyone got any idea if I have a leg to stand on here? I'm wondering if I should just not turn up at the station and see what happens.

 

Thanks

 

j

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a jobsworth! To begin with I would call her bluff. You weren't issued with a parking ticket at the time, so that threat is null and void and last time I looked there was no such offence of "driving away from a police officer". So what are there any witnesses to exactly? Nothing!

 

Go to the station and you will probably be charged with something, basically the old trick of getting you to come in to admit your guilt. Can you honestly see two old ladies being bothered to go down to the station and make a statement or turn up in court for an alleged parking offence? (there is no other offence here).

 

Even if they do the officer hasn't followed the procedure of actually issuing the ticket so it's not enforceable anyway! Phone her back and ask that given she must know the law, why is she deliberately ignoring it in order to get a conviction.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read this thread and thought i would add my two penneth

 

I am also from Blackpool (Just round the corner from you seylectric)

 

Since Blackpool BC took over the parking in town i have been issued with approx 46 tickets 40 of which i have paid All of which i now find out are unlawful :mad:

 

So i will be issuing proceedings for the return of the money which has been taken from me unlawfully.

The other intresting point of my case is that i appealed 6 of the tickets through NPAS and won my case:p :) But NPAS made no mention of the fact that the tickets were unlawfully issued just that they should not have been issued due to the fact that it was the ouncil who had caused the vehicle to be moved into an position that was in contravention of the rules.

 

If NPAS do not know that the tickets are issued in contravention of the rules (all their adjudicators are lawyers or barristers)then how is a layman going to know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...