Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Your parking ticket may be unlawful


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Complete success against Woking Council re their PCNs

 

Cancelled after informal representations due to no date of issue and misrepresenting who is liable to pay on the rear.

 

Only another 4 PCNs to go

  • Haha 1

7 actions in progress

 

amount refunded so far £6500

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 955
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I got parking ticket Westminster 20/7/06, £60.00 didn't pay it sure enough 20/7/06 Notice to Owner arrived wanting £100 because it hadn't been paid. Sent a representation saying "I refer to above PCN. The PCN issued at that time stated that the date of issue was 20/7/06 but did not state a date of contravention. Following the recent Judicial Review in the matter of Moses v Barnet originally referred to the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service, I have grounds to believe that the PCN was unlawfully issued and thus £100 is not, in fact, due. Got letter back 20/8/06 saying "this was a procedural error. You will not be hearing from us again"

 

Up yours Westminster, like LLOYDS TSB. you don't need the money either!

 

Good luck

Truth fears no questions.

MyzeeJon88 ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, that's the one thing that annoys me the most about these things, they DON'T need the money, they rake in more than they know what to do with then spend it on stuff we don't need, two-tone paintwork and new logos all over their new vans for example, new traffic lights replacing perfectly good old ones, free newsletters distributed to every household teling us how wonderful they are, pointless public information adverts on the radio and so on.

 

It's the principle of the whole thing that really does my head in.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolute disgrace, and proof if ever it was needed that it's just a cash cow. You wouldn't mind if the "victims" were actually doing any harm, i.e. blocking traffic flow or causing a hazard. No need for it at all in most cases EXCEPT to raise money. This money should be given back. :-x

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually about to fire off a questionnaire to the local council with the following questions; when I get answers I will be sending off another five similar questions:

 

 

1. Why is it necessary to put double yellow lines down in a short cul-de-sac that contains no houses, a hotel on one side and a park on the other?

 

2. Why do traffic wardens regularly patrol resident's parking areas but never patrol other areas where cars are regularly parked partly on footpaths?

 

3. Why is it deemed necessary to ticket a car "illegally" parked in a resident's parking area at 11 p.m.

 

when there is obviously ample spare parking space that is not going to be taken up by residents overnight?

 

4. Why, when motorists already pay more money into the road systems in road tax (road fund licence) than is ever spent on the roads, have parking meters been installed on certain roads around the town centre?

 

5. Why have double yellow lines been painted in an otherwise disused long lay-by, which is not used for any other purpose other than a little used bus stop at the top end?

 

(Locations included)

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just found this thread & i can't believe this site is helping me out again.:)

I took my daughter in to my local town (Leeds)to drop a sick note off at work. I always park in the car park which isn't council but for some mad reason on this occasion I noticed a parking space on the road just outside the car park. I looked around for a ticket machine but couldn't see one & no signs on where to get a ticket so I went in to the car park & got a ticket from the machine.

When i got back to the car after dropping the sick note off I had got a ticket which says I did not show a valid pay & display ticket. I noticed an attendant over the road so went to speak to him & he said I should have got my ticket from the machine at the top of the road & round the corner, how was i supposed to know that.:-x

As I said earlier I usually park in the car park which I have done since but out of curiousity I have walked past parked cars on the road & many have got penalty tickets stuck to them which to me proves the council are not informing drivers where to get there tickets, they had tickets they had got through the car park machine.

I have just checked my penalty ticket & it does not say date of issue, it just says date so i am going to fight this, this council must know what they are doing by putting the machine so far away from the spaces & not having a sign up stating where the machine is.

Is there a template letter i can send about this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it doesn't say "date of issue" its unlawful

 

Dispute it.

 

i received a ticket in the ASDA car park. I had my grandson with me who at the moment we are toilet training, and was desperatley wainting the toilet. I called into the asda one sunday afternoon and it was very busy. I parked in what I thought was the kiddies parking area when we came out I had a notice stuck to the windscreen. It was a parking fine from Town & city Parking, Perth even though this occured in Sheffield. As I didn't want to incurr any further charges I duly paid up, £20 instead of £40.00

 

Now looking at my ticket I can't see and date of issue anywhere on the ticket, nor date of offence just the ticket says in bold at the top of the slip CIVIL PENALTY CHARGE NOTICE.

 

then goes onto;

 

DATE 07.10.2006

TIME 15.36

 

FIRST SEEN 15.34

 

LOCATION

ASDA STORE HANDSWORTH SHEFFIELD

 

REASON: UNATHORISED PARKING IN A DISABLED BAY

 

VEHICLE MAKE CITROEN

 

VEHICLE MODEL ELATION

 

RFL 45418194

 

REG. NO. NXXXXXX (i bLOCKED THIS OUT)

 

COLOUR BLUE

 

iSSUING OFFICIAL NO HJE2

 

SIGNATURE JOHN EXXXX

 

Then it goes onto say:

 

This vehicle was parked at the location stated at the specified time in breach of the terms and conditions advertised.

 

A Civil Penalty charge of £40.00 is now due.

 

Then goes on about the payment instructions.

 

:confused: Is this ticket lawful and should i claim back my charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

THIS IS SCANDALOUS. Private companies are jumping on the bandwagon and using the same tactics as councils are and illegally ticketing people. Most people pay up because they are coerced into believing that if they don't pay they are liable to pay more.

 

GARBAGE! DON'T PAY UP! They have absolutely NO juristiction in the law of this land to fine you anything! Thw worst they could do is lodge a court claim against you for non-payment; they have no legal right to fine you though and would get laughed out of court. THERE IS NO LAW which allows a private company to "fine" you (or clamp you for that matter) if you park on their land. DON'T FALL FOR IT!

 

If in doubt ask them to show you which law allows them to fine you without a trial. They will not be able to give you an answer because there isn't one.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

THIS IS SCANDALOUS. Private companies are jumping on the bandwagon and using the same tactics as councils are and illegally ticketing people. Most people pay up because they are coerced into believing that if they don't pay they are liable to pay more.

 

GARBAGE! DON'T PAY UP! They have absolutely NO juristiction in the law of this land to fine you anything! Thw worst they could do is lodge a court claim against you for non-payment; they have no legal right to fine you though and would get laughed out of court. THERE IS NO LAW which allows a private company to "fine" you (or clamp you for that matter) if you park on their land. DON'T FALL FOR IT!

 

If in doubt ask them to show you which law allows them to fine you without a trial. They will not be able to give you an answer because there isn't one.

 

Should I ask for the money back

Link to post
Share on other sites

THIS IS SCANDALOUS. Private companies are jumping on the bandwagon and using the same tactics as councils are and illegally ticketing people. Most people pay up because they are coerced into believing that if they don't pay they are liable to pay more.

 

GARBAGE! DON'T PAY UP! They have absolutely NO juristiction in the law of this land to fine you anything! Thw worst they could do is lodge a court claim against you for non-payment; they have no legal right to fine you though and would get laughed out of court. THERE IS NO LAW which allows a private company to "fine" you (or clamp you for that matter) if you park on their land. DON'T FALL FOR IT!

 

If in doubt ask them to show you which law allows them to fine you without a trial. They will not be able to give you an answer because there isn't one.

 

Should I ask for my money back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone help me? i got a pcn y'day for parking on single yellow line or rather hubby did. we were taking our 30 day notice to vacate to our letting agent before they closed at 5 o'clock or we would've had to pay £550 for another months rent!

We were in there for about 10 mins and when we came out saw a warden printing a ticket, my husband said dont issue it we're back and we're going now, no matter she said as of 6 mins ago you were in contravention of code 02

Now as we dont frequent this road we didnt know that between 4.30 and 6pm you cant park on the single yellow line as the road is a busy through route for rush hour traffic!

After reading this thread i'm wondering if the ticket is indeed lawful as it only states notice number date and time (no issue) on it anywhere! it does however state the contravention (02) but not the date for that either?

Guys???

1

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to lots of reading thru this thread which has all the info but in essence as a result of the recent high court case Barnet V Moses the PCN has got to have 2 dates

 

The date of issue / notice and the date of contravention.

 

If it dosnt then it is completely unenforcable.

 

even if it did have both of these theres about half a dozen other pit falls for the council to fall into which they seem to do regularly.

 

If there is only one date make representations to the council referring to the above case.

 

They will have to cancel it

 

Which council is it ?

7 actions in progress

 

amount refunded so far £6500

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth mentioning this again from a few months back:

 

"Under the decriminalised scheme brought in by the Road Traffic Act 1991, when a vehicle is, for example, parked on a yellow line during controlled hours, it is said to be parked ‘in contravention of the regulations’. Thus there are no offences, merely contraventions...............In some car parks, contraventions of the regulations are enforced by Parking Attendants issuing Penalty Charge Notices. These can be challenged in same way as if the Penalty Charge Notice had been issued to a vehicle parked in the street"

 

This is a quote which actually comes from the official NPAS (National Parking Adjudication Service) site!

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to lots of reading thru this thread which has all the info but in essence as a result of the recent high court case Barnet V Moses the PCN has got to have 2 dates

 

The date of issue / notice and the date of contravention.

 

If it dosnt then it is completely unenforcable.

 

even if it did have both of these theres about half a dozen other pit falls for the council to fall into which they seem to do regularly.

 

If there is only one date make representations to the council referring to the above case.

 

They will have to cancel it

 

Which council is it ?

bristol city council, it only says date of notice on it, not issue anywhere!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then it aint lawful.

 

Also read seylectics 290.

 

If the ticket in anyway refers to 'fine' 'offence' or 'penalty' the same applies. You can only contravene the parking regulations. You DO NOT commit an 'offence' so can't be 'fined' or 'penalised'

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...