Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS) Name of the Claimant :           PARKINGEYE LTD Claimants Solicitors: (if one is stated)   Date of issue – 22 April 2024   Date for AOS - 11 May 2024 Date to submit Defence - 24 May 2024 What is the claim for –  Claim for monies outstanding from the Defendant in relation to a Parking charge (reference *************) issued on 22/01/2024.  The signage clearly displayed throughout Welcome Break Leicester Forest East (North), Northbound, M1, Jct 21/21a, Leicester Forest, Leicester, LE3 3GB states that this is private land, managed by ParkingEye Ltd, and that it is subject to terms and conditions, including the payment of parking tariffs, by which those who park agree to be bound (the contract).  ParkingEye's ANPR system captured vehicle ******* entering and leaving the site on 16/01/2024, and parking without paying to park and parking tariffs apply after a free stay period.  Pursuant to Sch 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, notice has been given to the registered keeper, making them liable for the Parking Charge payable upon breach. What is the value of the claim? 100.00 ? Amount Claimed 125.00 court fees 35.00 legal rep fees 50.00  Total Amount 210.00 Have you moved since the issuance of the PCN? No Did you receive a letter of Claim With A reply Pack wanting I&E etc about 1mth before the claimform? Y dated 10 March 2024, no reply
    • Obviously I'm ignorant and don't know the local area - but to me the images show the front of the car entering, and the rear of the car exiting, both times. On a second point - do you have any proof of your being elsewhere during the two times they reckon you were three hours in the car park? BTW, I've just done a search and we have 81 G24 threads apart from yours.  This is a company that huffs & puffs but very rarely does court.  In fact of the 81 cases, in 79 they haven't done court In one court case sadly the Cagger didn't defend and lost by default. In the second case G24 issued a court claim ...and then wet themselves and discontinued the case once the Cagger defended.
    • Often vehicle insurers will refuse to deal with third party property damage claims. They will by lack of willing rely on the third party to use their company Insurance  and the companies Insurance would try to reclaim through your Car Insurance. Agree with Ethel, but sometimes Insurance claims staff will try to avoid additional work.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Idem/hoist/lowell (2nd MBNA credit card) debt - lowell refund letter


blondiegirl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received a 'notice of assignment' letter from Hoist.

This debt has been sold to Hoist from Idem who purchased it from MBNA. 

My other MBNA card has lead to legal action from Idem so I was surprised to see this.

What do I do?

Ignore it until Hoist send a claim?

Thanks.

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

they must follow the pre action protocol first.

 

I suspect this is simply a large portfolio of debts that's been shifted around as deals are done.

you are also not the only one to report mass debt sale Idem to Hoist. recently.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've now had a letter and an email from Robinson Way trying to arrange a way for me to pay off the debt.

 

I assume this is another DCA (on top of all the others) who will now start to bother me who should be ignored?

 

The MBNA card was taken out in 2005 and for which, I *think* a signed credit agreement exists - could this be a problem?? 

 

I didn't receive a notice of assignment from MBNA to Idem, and MBNA didn't default me, only Idem did when I stopped paying.

Idem2.pdf

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

robbersway are another trading name of hoist

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The important thing for you is when was the last payment you made or when you last acknowledged the debt if ever. Even though you say MBNA didn't default you, you must have stopped paying them at some time before they passied the amount on to Idem. Do you know the timings of when you stopped paying MBNA and started paying Idem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

payments might not in all cases

but written and signed letters.

but then again

we've never seen a case lost solely because one exists and was used.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My worry about this account, is that there appears to be a signed credit agreement (attached previously).

With our other 2, there's only the application form.

 

Robinson Way or someone acting on their behalf, are calling daily now so I have blocked them.

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Idem (2nd MBNA credit card) debt sold to HOIST

but its not complete.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is that all they sent as their CCA return?

 

if so ignore until/unless they get cohen's or one of their other desk nearer to the bog to send a letter of claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well find it then.

there should have been pages of T&C's with your name/ad on the 1st page and a statement of account.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In response to the CCA I sent 2 years ago:

 

Idem sent the 2 pages I've uploaded, a page printed out with some addresses on  and codes (internal data not stating much), and 3 pages of 'Terms and Conditions' dated 11/04 by the looks of it as well as a statement from October 2017. 

 

On the top of page of these T&C's:

 

Terms and Conditions

Please refer to your Credit Agreement for conditions 1, 2 and 3

 

which I assume is the page 2 of the uploads which I can't really read. 

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you know from your other mbna threads debt buyers fake stuff

 

So do the t&c's have your correct name and address for the time of takeout

And the correct date code in the little letters at the bottom for your agreement date?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then blank rubbish from their filing cabinet not a copy of what was issued to YOU at the time

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi all,

out of the blue, I have received a cheque from Lowell for £22 "in respect of an overpayment on this account".

£900 is showing as owed to Lowell, from idem which I think originated from MBNA.

I haven't paid them in maybe 2 years and they defaulted me 5 years ago, despite the fact that I defaulted the actual agreement with MBNA many years ago.

I am reluctant to call and ask in case any changes are made to my credit file - I desperately need the default to go and have about 12 months left.

Does anyone have any experience of this? Thanks.

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant change when the default and the whole account drops off on the defaults 6th b'day.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Idem/hoist/lowell (2nd MBNA credit card) debt - lowell refund letter

old and new threads merged.

a dca cannot issue a default notice.

if mbna defaulted you years ago and say via an sar to mbna you could get a copy of their DN then lowells can be amde to correct the cra file Default date.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A dca may not be allowed to to issue a default notice, but they do, or at least they change status on a credit file.

MBNA didn't ever issue a DN otherwise it wouldn't be showing on my file (the debt started about 10+ years ago). I was on a payment plan with MBNA years ago with the debt getting sold to a dca. The dca changed my credit file to dn 5 years ago. 

The debt has been passed from one dca to another it's hard to see who's done what.   

- BlondieGirl

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...