Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free  I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out. Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Allay Claims Company PPI /Can a percentage be taken even though they didn’t pursue?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1774 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I signed up to a PPI claim firm on a bit of a whim (yes, I know!) and they came back saying that even though it looks like I had PPI with Abbey National (Santander) back in 2000 it’s such a small amount they won’t be pursuing it. They sent this in a letter, also saying I might want to pursue this small amount myself. I cannot now find that letter but I’m still looking. 

 

I’ve not got around to contacting Santander myself yet, it was about a month or so ago. Well, I got a letter yesterday from Santander saying they’re going to make a fairly decent sized payment to me...

 

So, my questions are these; can the claim management company now ask for their percentage on this larger than they obviously realised payment?

 

Here’s where it gets really worrying, I owe Santander more than the amount they’re saying they will pay me on another completely separate loan.

I have a payment arrangement on that loan but have pretty much accepted that they will likely not actually send me the money but offset it to that.

 

Fair enough but if the claims management firm chase their huge percentage when I’ve not actually had it in my hand I’m going to be in an extremely difficult position...

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the basis of what you say, they seem to have washed their hands of it and so they would have no claim any fee on anything you recover yourself.

You probably won't want to hear this, but you have no idea how much it breaks my heart that we struggle to provide this free forum for hundreds of thousands of people and then we get people who have been members here for 10 years and they still end up signing with PPI schemes and then get into a panic when they think that they may have to pay the fee that they signed up for.

And when people reclaim their PPI with our help, we are generally speaking lucky even to get a £10 donation – or even a thank you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally understand what you’re saying but I would have no issue with paying their fee if I were to have the money into my hands. I’m just concerned that they would try and take the fee even though they said they weren’t pursuing and I won’t actually have the money in my hands and it will be difficult for me to find the cash to pay them, I’m in no way moaning about just paying their fee. If the claim with them had gone through as normal with them I would have paid it because that’s what I signed up for.  

 

I appreciate your advice, thank you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless the loans were directly related then I would hope satans bank will not try off-set!!

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve read conflicting views on this, some banks don’t if they’re not related (they’re not) but as we’re talking about Santander I’m pretty sure they will. At the end of the day I do owe them that money so it is what it is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its not, throw the morality card out the window..

 

satans bank have been themselves subject to a few wins here whereby they've said they will off-set [even to a DCA after the debt has been SOLD by them] and when taken to the FOS or confronted with evidence they cannot, CAG has seen a win.

 

there is no way they can off set an old 2000 abbey PPI refund against present day debt...they didnt even own abbey then.

 

banks cant offset PPI.pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve read conflicting views on this, some banks don’t if they’re not related (they’re not) but as we’re talking about Santander I’m pretty sure they will. At the end of the day I do owe them that money so it is what it is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an update, I’ve not heard anything further from Santander yet but Allay Claims are already chasing for their cut. 

 

I have found the letter from the claims company now, it says clearly that they will not be able to pursue the claim and to do it myself. I just don’t see how they can now be sending me invoices when I’ve not even had any payment. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Allay Claims Company PPI /Can a percentage be taken even though they didn’t pursue?

Thread title amended

 

You didn't provide details of your bank account did you when you signed up with this lot ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have known some just take their commision direct from the account......as long as they are only invoicing you thats fine...ignore their invoices.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

well be expecting to get lots of scary letter

aLLay will not give in quickly or easily.

 

 

did you sign their letter of authority to act upon your behalf with satans bank?

be careful 

it might be best to let each know as from the date of that letter

you regard the contract cancelled/void as satans should not be informing nor corresponding with allay..which they probably are.

and you instruct them not too!

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...