Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Data Protection act non compliance


twoofus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just penned this and am posting it tomorrow, what do you think guys??

 

 

To whom it may concern,

 

I am writing with regard to your letter to me dated 27/11/2006 from Miss A.

 

On the 11/10/2006 I issued Yorkshire Bank with a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) under the data protection act for the bank to send me all of the information that you (Yorkshire Bank) hold on myself.

Under the DPA you have 40 days from the issue of the SAR to return this information to myself, a target which you have failed to meet. Also in your own Banking Code under the heading Data protection, para. 11.3. it says “We will explain to you that, under the Data Protection Act, you have the right to see the personal records we hold about you”. You have failed to act under your own guidelines. I also issued you with a letter before action after the 40 day period giving you a further 7days to comply before I entered into legal action, again a target you failed to meet.

 

Taking this matter into consideration and your non-compliance of the DPA, I am righting to notify you, as I am sure you are aware, that my account (xxxxxxxx) should now be considered in DISPUTE.

 

With regards to the letter I received from Miss A on 27/11/06, and particularly with regards to the threat of transferring my account to ‘Collections’ and notifying Credit Reference Agencies about my account balance, a balance which again I dispute due to the disproportionate charging on my account, I would like to point to your own ‘Banking Code’ which states that whilst an account is in dispute no information will be passed to the Credit reference agencies, and until this matter is resolved and whilst legal proceedings take place on this account, I trust that you will act accordingly.

 

I am also giving you this opportunity to stop any further charges being applied to my account due to its current Dispute status.

 

Finally I would like to point out that I have lodged a complaint with the Information Commissioners Office regarding this matter, that I am also currently in dialogue with Mrs B who works in Yorkshire Banks own ‘Banking Code’ compliance office and also pursuing through the courts with the hope that this matter can be resolved as quickly as possible.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

I know its a bit long winded but I have issues.lol.:rolleyes:

 

There was stuff I needed to squeeze in as they have been messing me about for ages.:(

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote=twoofus//Taking this matter into consideration and your non-compliance of the Data Protection Act, I am righting to notify you, as I am sure you are aware, that my account (xxxxxxxx) should now be considered in DISPUTE.//Quote.

Just a small point-"righting" should be "writing".

 

Everything else looks ok, but I do not expect them to refrain from applying

charges if you exceed your limit, since these are part of their T&C's and

not subject to the dispute ruling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To whom it may concern,

 

I am writing to notify you, to inform you that I am formally disputing the account balance.

 

In accordance to the Banking Code, Paragraph 13.6 states you must take enforcement action of register a default on this account until the dispute is resolved.

 

I have sent you letters setting out the dispute I have with the balance on this account and would urge you to settle this dispute Ellerey and to avoid the need for court action.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

IMHO you should keep this letter as brief as possible, you don't want this to slip through the net its an important issue. Vent your feelings by all means, when you get to court (if you do) you don't want anyone to think that the defendant could have missed the importance of this letter.

 

Prelims and LBAs are the place to vent your feelings if you so wish IMHO, there are times when its best to stick to the point and be very clear, this in my view is open of them.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

since these are part of their T&C's and

not subject to the dispute ruling.

 

How do you work that out?

 

An account in dispute is in dispute and whether its with the T&Cs or some other matter then the account is in dispute. On this basis you can never enter a dispute on your account since the running of the account is always subject to the T&C.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Glenn and thanks for your coments. I have tried to keep to the point and be as simple as I can but I am getting no-where fast. I have had to try this because they have ignored my SAR and the LBA that followed, I am now trying to get to court to get the relevent forms to start procedings for non-compliance. I have complained to there own 'compliance officer' and to the ICO and all with (up to now) no sign of any assistance.

 

While this is all happening and with them dragging there heals as much as possible to the point of breaking the DPA etc. my account is getting more and more charges and they are threatening me with collections and CRA's.

 

I understand what you are saying about basically a time and a place to vent frustrations but I am a million miles away from even issuing a prelim.

 

What would you have done/put in the letter mate, any help appreciated

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent off the request for statements on 16th Sept however received a list of charges and offer of £270.00 which they kindly put in the bank. They said this is what is usually requested and if I want the full list I should enclose a cheque for £10.00 with copy of passport or drivers license. As the SARS time is well over the limit and this appears to be the usual delaying tactics should I send the form back or just accept the list of charges they have sent me and start asking for it back. Due to being busy I have not had the opportunity to chase this up, I have just read the various threads and have a couple of days off so could get the letters posted and things moving. I'm not sure whether to trust the letter they sent listing all the charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything else looks ok, but I do not expect them to refrain from applying charges if you exceed your limit, since these are part of their T&C's and not subject to the dispute ruling.

 

Glenn, the omission by you of the first part of my statement was critical

in understanding the point I was making. And my point was that even if the

account was in dispute, that was not a reason for the bank to cease from

applying their charges if the account holder exceeded their agreed limit. If

you think otherwise I'd be pleased to hear your argument.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LFI

 

Thanks for the clarification I can see your point i think but i think what has confused me is they way you have worded it or maybe the way i read it.

 

I think what you mean is that if you continue to breach the contract, that because the breaches are covered within the T&C, they can continue to apply charges? And I agree with you, at least that they could recover their liquidated damages.

 

The way i read it the first time was that you could not dispute charges because they were part of the T&C.

 

It may be just the way i read it.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just shows, these banks (espiecially Yorkshire Bank) don't give a toss about me or any of the 'Acts' because they certainly are not abiding by them. What more can I do

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got my stsatements through this morning, finally. Don't know what other info is in there as i'm at work and my wife phoned to tell me.

 

There was also a letter notifying me that they have closed my account and passed it to collections and that legal procedeings to reclaim may start and they will also notify the CRA's:mad: . Thanks YB, you're terrific

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi not sure where to list the following as it is court action but for none compliance to S.A.R in Scotland.

For your info when I filed these at Glasgow Sheriff Court today they accepted them but had to seek further advise from a Sheriff of how to proceed as they advised an Order of this type - failure to comply the Section 7 of the Data Protection Act - had not been requested before from this court. They are to advise tomorrow but did take payment.

This is called a Summary Cause Summons (form 1b) I used the DPA none compliance template from the library (great help!!)

Form 1b one available http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/sheriff/summary_cause/forms.asp

As I am only claiming £50.00 for damages (my time, legal advice, letters etc) the cost was £39.00. Total Claim and order compliance sort £89.00.

Once processed they will sent it back to me for it to be served. I have to instruct a Sheriff Officer (find on web or yellow pages not sure of cost yet) to do this and pay for the service (is automatically added to claim) they then serve the summons on the defendant even though all mine are in England.

Summary Cause Summons issued

Barclaycard £89.00 14/12/06 Glasgow Sheriff Court

Lloyds TSB Bank Plc £89.00 14/12/06 Glasgow Sheriff Court

Lowell Financial Ltd £89.00 14/12/06 Glasgow Sheriff Court

Also online complaint filed with Information Commissioners Office

Will advice of case numbers and Sheriff officers fee and how it’s served if Defendant is in England as in my case

Apologies if you already know this works could be of benefit to other users.

Coffeebien

Capital One - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90559 £759.25 (15/12/06 not aknowledged yet)

MBNA - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90575 £764.45 (Aknowledged 7.12.06)

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Goldfish (Lloyds) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - Dropped as Lloyds liable

RBS Visa S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - received and holding on as own bank

RBS Bank S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (recieved waiting to open new A/c 1st)

 

Lloyds TSB - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

 

Lowell Financial Ltd - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a little note, when I got in last night and looked through my statements I noticed a letter that my wife had missed. It appears that the Banks 'Compliance officer' has got involved and thats the reason why the statements have eventually come through (without me going to court for them). There is a letter from the compliance office apoligising and reasuring me I will receive my statements promptly and say they are continuing to investgate why my branch hasn't adhered to the DPA....blah...blah....blah.

 

I also have a letter from someone in the customer services department as a way of compensation. Its an interestting one and I will post it later when I have more time cos I have an interesting story and scenario to go with it. It may also set a precident for future non-compliance issues (maybe).

My YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

Wifes YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 23/11/06: LBA 27/11/06: Offer Rejection 17/12/06: MCOL 09/02/07

Joint YB account: S.A.R. 11/10/06: Prelim 09/02/07: LBA 17/02/07

My FD account: Settled

Wifes FD account: Settled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi not sure where to list the following as it is court action but for none compliance to S.A.R in Scotland.

 

For your info when I filed these at Glasgow Sheriff Court today they accepted them but had to seek further advise from a Sheriff of how to proceed as they advised an Order of this type - failure to comply the Section 7 of the Data Protection Act - had not been requested before from this court. They are to advise tomorrow but did take payment.

 

This is called a Summary Cause Summons (form 1b) I used the Data Protection Act none compliance template from the library (great help!!)

 

Form 1b one available http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/sheriff/summary_cause/forms.asp

 

 

As I am only claiming £50.00 for damages (my time, legal advice, letters etc) the cost was £39.00. Total Claim and order compliance sort £89.00.

 

Once processed they will sent it back to me for it to be served. I have to instruct a Sheriff Officer (find on web or yellow pages not sure of cost yet) to do this and pay for the service (is automatically added to claim) they then serve the summons on the defendant even though all mine are in England.

 

 

Summary Cause Summons issued

 

Barclaycard £89.00 14/12/06 Glasgow Sheriff Court

Lloyds TSB Bank Plc £89.00 14/12/06 Glasgow Sheriff Court

Lowell Financial Ltd £89.00 14/12/06 Glasgow Sheriff Court

 

Also online complaint filed with Information Commissioners Office

 

Will advice of case numbers and Sheriff officers fee and how it’s served if Defendant is in England as in my case

 

 

Apologies if you already know this works could be of benefit to other users.

 

 

 

Coffeebien

 

 

In short to this - The Sheriff sent these back to me stating "not Proper" and to consult legal help.

 

Completed on N1 instead and filed at Penrith County Court (using an English address) and was accepted ans Summons being served tom 20/12/06. I found this Very frustrating trying to do this in Scotland

Capital One - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90559 £759.25 (15/12/06 not aknowledged yet)

MBNA - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90575 £764.45 (Aknowledged 7.12.06)

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Goldfish (Lloyds) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - Dropped as Lloyds liable

RBS Visa S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - received and holding on as own bank

RBS Bank S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (recieved waiting to open new A/c 1st)

 

Lloyds TSB - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

 

Lowell Financial Ltd - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...