Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stoatchild vs Barclays


stoatchild
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have just completed my data protection S.A.R - what is the best address to send it to? A lot of the links suggest Churchill Place in London but the Leicester address also seems well recommended in a couple of places. Would your recommended address be the same for my Woolwich S.A.R too?

 

Thanks for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any one of these or, as BB posted, handing in to your branch - but make sure you get a receipt. It seems thougn that going via the branch has benefit of a speedier response.

Barclays Bank PLC – Data Protection (This is where I sent mine)

Radbroke Hall

Knutsford

Cheshire

WA16 9EU

Barclays Bank Plc

Freepost RLTA-CSUE-TCHC

Head Office Customer Relations

London

E14 5HP

Barclays Bank Plc

Leicester

LE87 2BB

 

Barclays Bank PLC

Litigation and Disputes team

Level 29

1 Churchill Place

London

E14 5HP

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant - thanks for that response.

 

In branch sounds good. I was just trawling through the Woolwich links as well for my other SAR and in-branch seemed to be the favoured option there as well so I think that might be the way ahead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

An update to my thread - followed by a question:

 

23rd Nov - Sent my SAR to Barclays recorded delivery to Churchill Place in the end.

 

27th Nov - Received the standard stroppy letter from them advising me statements would be on their way attaching my tenner back.

 

9 Dec - Received all my statements - and I'm about to get busy with the highlighter pen!!!!

 

 

My question is this: I am at the same stage with the Woolwich and in an ideal world I would like to go all the way with one claim but would accept a quick fix with the other.

 

The norm seems to be that following my next letter they will offer about half the total due - however I would of course consider this a derisory offer - although I would probably be happy along the lines of 75%/80% of the total claim.

 

I was just wondering if in my letter to one of the banks, whether I could state my total claim as 100% of the figure but would be willing to settle on a 75% figure (call it my festive gesture of goodwill!!), otherwise I will go all the way. Surely it would be beneficial to them knowing that it would probably save them money in the long run? I dare say they might put hurdles in the way as always and laugh it off though!

 

Has anyone ever tried this? Would this sort of letter be frowned upon at all by anyone?(I wouldn't want this to in any way undermine the good work of this site), would it weaken my case in any way?

 

Any comments would be of great interest. It just struck me that it might be the sort of thing that someone else may have contemplated before.

 

Thanks for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's any help - I tried that with Barclays asking for nearly the full amount in the interest of a swift conclusion and keeping costs to a minimum, and got the stiff two fingers.

 

I think it's prbably best to stick to the tried and tested approach.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to show determination to follow through it would be better, IMHO, to stick with the 100% refund route with both banks. You will get 100%, maybe sooner rather than later, it really depends on the amount you're claiming - the banks seem to settle the smaller claims quicker than the larger ones.

 

The trouble with you offering to accept a part settlement is that

a. you look weak and

b. you could go back for more at a later date so will have to sign a "full and final" agreement which you certainly don't want to do because if they should charge you in the future you may want to claim again.

 

It may take a little while longer but it will be worth it!

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Happy New Year to all !

 

Update on claim:

 

Based on my request for refund of charges of £2150 (excluding interest), Barclays sent me their usual standard letter on 8th January offering £1000 as a 'gesture of goodwill'. Things actually seem to be moving quite quickly so far!

 

For info, the letter came from: Retail Banking Customer Relations, PO Box 449, Swansea, SA1 5WY Tel (01792) 492673.

 

So the banker has offered £1,000. Deal or no deal ???!? ('no deal' I hear you cry!!)

 

 

A few people seem to be getting success by ringing the bank - is it worth doing this at this stage or should I stick with the schedule and do things via the snail mail?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy New Year to all !

 

Update on claim:

 

Based on my request for refund of charges of £2150 (excluding interest), Barclays sent me their usual standard letter on 8th January offering £1000 as a 'gesture of goodwill'. Things actually seem to be moving quite quickly so far!

 

For info, the letter came from: Retail Banking Customer Relations, PO Box 449, Swansea, SA1 5WY Tel (01792) 492673.

 

So the banker has offered £1,000. Deal or no deal ???!? ('no deal' I hear you cry!!)

 

 

A few people seem to be getting success by ringing the bank - is it worth doing this at this stage or should I stick with the schedule and do things via the snail mail?

 

Definitely not. Much much too early. They want their pound of flesh first. You have a couple of months before even thinking about that. You should be as close as two weeks to a court date before even considering a phone call to them.

 

The trouble is, people are (quite understandably) keen to get their hands on the money. At the moment, Barclays are content to deal with people by phone and whos court date is imminent. There are a huge amount of claimants, so can you imagine if everyone claimed at this stage? The danger then would be that Barclays would change their numbers, go ex directory then no-one would be able to do it. You see, the Banks stretch it out, hoping that claimants settle for their first offer or lose their bottle along the way to Court. So they save money in the process.

 

Hold tight. It will come but let due process work first.

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello all !

 

A quick update.

 

Unfortunately, I have had to bail out at the early stages with this one. The need for the cash was too great because without going into any great detail, I failed on my mortgage which is on the final month of an arrears plan and my only offer of a loan which might have tided me over was an 'attractive' 36.9% APR from those people at Beneficial Finance who love to kick you when you are down!!

 

Therefore, it has come down to a question of practicality over principles on this occasion - and these funds should allow me to be able to see my case against the Woolwich through to the bitter end instead !!!

 

However, it is worth mentioning that I didn't go down without a fight and therefore I telephoned Barclays to see if they would be willing to offer any more. I spoke to a very helpful lady and I told her that based on my original claim of £2150 which could increase to £2500 after interest, that I found their 1K offer very disappointing and would they consider making me a more attractive offer? After a bit of haggling, they upped their offer to £1300 which is the figure I am now accepting. I have been told to amend the original offer letter as per my conversation.

 

Do I need to be wary of anything on the return of this form or request any particulars? I have agreed it will be full and final settlement which I am OK with as I don't actually have any more outgoings from this account any more and I am therefore unlikely to have future charges. I assume 'full and final settlement of my complaint with Barclays' as stated on the form refers only to a complaint made against this account number (i.e that it won't hamper my Woolwich claim which is also through Barclays).

I also asked about Barclays removing any defaults and she said to put that in writing and they would look into it.

 

Any advice on the last paragraph would be great. It's a shame I'm not writing a success story on this one four months up the line but circumstances got in the way this time! I will be aiming for higher with the Woolwich!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...