Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

mrdfuller VS Natwest


FullerBeans
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5818 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes, there is a few on here Ive seen them. But as the saying goes, just keep it simple. Something like,

 

Dear X

 

Account No:

Name:

Sort Code.

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated xxxxx offering me xxxxx in full and final settlement of my claim against you.

 

After much deliberation, I have decided to accept this offer on the proviso that the money is paid directly into my account by xxxxxxx or within 10 working days from the date of this letter, (and remember to date your letter).

 

I look forward to receipt of the funds, and confirm that my claim will be considered concluded only upon receipt of the funds into my bank as stated above. If for any reason, the funds do not appear in my account within this time scale, then I reserve the right to continue with my full claim, and will be contacting the courts to issue legal proceedings on xxxxxx should this condition not be met.

 

I thank you for your early response.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

something like that should do it. Just keep it simple but cover yourself.

 

 

 

xxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mumofthreeboys

Without Prejudice means you cannot show this letter to a court should it get that far.

 

I would want all my letters to be shown as it would show the Judge that I have tried not to take the time of the courts, which is an overriding objective under CPR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend, who is a solicitor with his own practice has told me to put anything to my bank which is in writing, as WITHOUT PREJUDICE whenever they are attaching any sort of condition to anything. Is he wrong then ? Hes been practising for 22 years. ???? I would appreciate an answer on this because thats what Ive been doing in my letters. I would hate to think hes told me wrong, and Ive fluffed up. Because Ive done it. xxx thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So based on that then, what it is saying is if the court has no jurisdiction over such a claim it can be thrown out. But the whole point of submitting the claim in the first place, is because the court you are submitting it to will have jurisdiction. Im no legal eagle on this, but Im gonna check with my friend, because Im seriously beginning to worry now. I did everything as per his recommendations, and he touch wood, has always given sound advice. I dont quite understand the wikipedia wording. Doesnt make sense to me, all legal jargon. Im confident my claim is spot on, no mistakes, so why would the court have no jurisdiction over the amount of my claim. IM LOST. I COMPLETELY DONT UNDERSTAND. IM GONNA PM NATTIE OR MICHEAL BROWNE OR SOMEBODY BECAUSE THIS HAS THROWN ME NOW, and Im gonna phone my friend. Help. lol xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mumofthreeboys

This is the part I was referring to:-

 

In many common law jurisdictions such as England, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore, the term "without prejudice" is also used in the course of negotiations to indicate that a particular conversation or letter is not to be tendered as evidence in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phew, thanks for the info, but OMG you really got me going then. My friend says, He knows what youre saying, and yes it has been used in that context before, but mainly abroad, and very very rarely in this country. Phew. I feel better now. Was about to have cardiac and thought my claim had just gone down the swanee. H*ll please dont do that to me. My heart skipped a beat. I asked him if it has done any harm in what Ive put on my letters and he said CATEGORICALLY NO. Its fine. Its more of an old fashioned way of using it he said. Nobody really pays that much notice to it anymore and it means that if he wants to further claim in future, hes able to do so without it affecting this particular claim, i.e. he said, he can accept this money, and sign the form the natwest have sent him, but that if he still wants then claim in future, he can. God I wish I had a better legal brain. Im just going mainly on this site and my friend. But OMG you had me going there for a mo. LOL. Ah well, Im ok now. No harm done.

 

Fendy xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whenever I have entered into correspondence and used the term "Without Prejudice" it is because I wish to indicate my willingness to resolve/settle such dispute outside of the courts.

 

I could be wrong here but I would think this would be looked upon favourably by the courts as it would indicate you have tried and given the opportunity to resolve the matter without court intervention!

 

Please, someone correct me if they think/know otherwise!

Natwest Bank Plc owe me £1,227.48

06/03/07 - Prelim Sent

16/03/07 - Claim authorised, in full, via telephone...

28/03/07 - Full offer received in writing - YAY

29/03/07 - Offer accepted!

 

Bank of Scotland Mastercard owe me £497.00

11/03/07 - Complaint telephone call logged

29/03/07 - 50% offer received...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mumofthreeboys

lmfao Fendy, I didn't mean to worry you. I was just querying the "Without Prejudice" part, which I still don't think is needed.

 

I'll get you a glass of wine, that will calm you down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL, Im such a novice. I really panicked there for a mo. Anyway, Laura D whoever you are, thats basically exactly what my friend said. It is admissable as evidence in court, and they tend to look at it like youre trying to settle it. Im no expert, Im really not, hence why I rely on the good people on here to help, but I have been told by my solicitor friend, that WITHOUT PREJUDICE, would not prejudice anybodys case at all if it was on any letter throughout the process. He said it simply means that. Youre not being prejudiced against them, youre just trying to settle things. I rely on what he tells me because I wouldnt have a clue otherwise. So either way, Mr D Fuller, it doesnt matter. Personally I would put it, but Mum of Three boys wouldnt, but either way, legally I have been categorically told it wont affect anything, whether you do or you dont, other than it means if anything like this happens again going forward you can claim again, and you can produce the letter in court if it got that far and it is admissable as evidence in your case. Phew. Where would we be without the help of each other on here eh. !!!! wine in hand now Mum of three boys, but thanks for mentioning it. Its always better to check than not, and get it wrong. Ta Muchly Moo. Youre a star. !!! but please dont make my heart skip again..................xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fendy,

 

No probs - whilst I'm not a barrister/lawyer just yet, I do work in Company Law so see these kind of phrases quite a bit!

 

My job is prob also the reason I'm quite excited about all of this - can't wait to start reading Acts and quoting till I'm blue in the face!!!!

 

Good luck with your claim

 

L x

 

P.s. I wrote without prejudice on my prelim letter ;o)

Natwest Bank Plc owe me £1,227.48

06/03/07 - Prelim Sent

16/03/07 - Claim authorised, in full, via telephone...

28/03/07 - Full offer received in writing - YAY

29/03/07 - Offer accepted!

 

Bank of Scotland Mastercard owe me £497.00

11/03/07 - Complaint telephone call logged

29/03/07 - 50% offer received...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reassurance. It really helps. Ooooh company law. You smart thing. At least youre in the right frame of mind for the fight. Relishing it rather than being frightened. I always think fear kind of gets in the way a bit for something like this. You have to try and overcome it. But for some its very difficult. Im a bit like you. Im not an expert by any stretch of the imagination, but I am relishing the fight. I would love to stand up in court and be able to put my case forward fairly. But you can never guarantee what kind of judge your gonna get I suppose. Thats the danger. Anyway, thank you for the reassurance. It really does help and its very very very much appreciated. Good luck too, but with your job, and knowledge Im sure you wont need it. xxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

from reading backwards. if you have given 10 days then you have 10 days but if you have accepted it i would expect it to be paid into the account in the order that it is received. You may be aware of an increase in mail to Customer Relations Unit,Borehamwood.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...