Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
    • Because that’s what the email said. Anyway it’s done now. Posted and image emailed.    im doing some reading in preparation for defence but I will need my hand holding quite tightly by you good people.  I’m a little bit clueless
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Allied International Credit


spotnot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5266 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm off to buy a recording device tomorrow, using the money I claimed back from charges no less. Can't wait for my next snooty phone call!

In a completely random aside - Seminole, every time I see your avatar I cack myself..

A+L - £950 settled in full.

 

Bank of Scotland - MCOL filed 9 Jan for £1500

 

Bank of Scotland (for parents) - £5000 settled in full October 06

 

Bank of Scotland (mum's account) £1900 settled in full November 06

 

Intelligent Finance: DPA non compliance sent 26 Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Very interseting!!

As it happens I sent a CCA request to Sechairi Clarke & Mitchell back in September, nothing back except a letter asking for payment. I sent them a letter back saying they've commited an offence by not responding to a CCA request and now I get a demand for payment this morning from Allied International? So they've passed it on. Any advice, templated letters to send them?:-?

27th September CCA sent to Sechiari Clarke & Mitchell - Commited Offence by not responding-Update, passed account to AIC. CCA AIC on 29/03/07

27th September CCA sent to Allied Credit International - not received, resent on 23th January 07-(still nothing on 30/03/07)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I was under the impression that they couldn't pass a debt on. Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm always willing to learn.

 

The original creditor has your permission to pass on your details to 'any relevant party'. It'll be in the terms and Conditions. Now if **** didn't have the agreement, they didn't have permission to pass your details on. You have signed nothing with ****, no T&Cs.

 

Of course, what might have happened is that they have referred the debt back to Lloyds (am assuming its Lloyds) and they have passed the debt to Allied International.These idiots will probably have bought the debt, so its worth sendiing them a CCA. Chances are they won't have a copy of the agreement.

 

Have you received a default from the original creditor?

 

Spot

Spotnot v MBNA and their nasty solicitors (on behalf of my friend)

 

If I have helped in any way, click my scales.

 

Remember, we were all newbies once!!

 

When you win, donate!!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is Lloyds, I'm not sure if they've defaulted the account but I'd guess they probably have. It was my understanding that they couldn't pass on a defaulted account? Not sure about sending AIC a CCA request and resetting the time schedule? Might be the way forward:confused:

27th September CCA sent to Sechiari Clarke & Mitchell - Commited Offence by not responding-Update, passed account to AIC. CCA AIC on 29/03/07

27th September CCA sent to Allied Credit International - not received, resent on 23th January 07-(still nothing on 30/03/07)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks can pass on a defaulted account to an agency for collection and generally do.

A+L - £950 settled in full.

 

Bank of Scotland - MCOL filed 9 Jan for £1500

 

Bank of Scotland (for parents) - £5000 settled in full October 06

 

Bank of Scotland (mum's account) £1900 settled in full November 06

 

Intelligent Finance: DPA non compliance sent 26 Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi I came across the site following an extremely rude telephone conversation with a Mr Hamilton of AIC. I had heard about the site on radio previously. I was re-assured to read so many posts about other peoples' experience of this company. I was going to write a letter of complaint but after reading the posts I see that this would be useless. However I would like like to send Hamilton the CCA letter that a number of posts refer to. Can anyone tell me a) What is a CCA letter and b) where can I get a template of the letter. Thank you for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have recently had dealing with this company, back in April 2005 I returned a contract hire vehicle to Lloyds after running into financial diffs with the payments, the car was returned in mint condition (merc) after twelve months an agent from lloyds came to my house and said I owed 6k, but after a while he rang lloyds and thy agreed to ask for £100 per month up to £1300, and I agreed, I had been paying y direct ebit for about six months then Lloyds stopped taking the payments, then I received a letter sent to my previous adress requesting £6500, I wrote to Lloyds and refere them back to our old agreement and they denied that an agreement was in place, I heard nothing for ages until two months ago when I had a letter with a demand letter from Close credit who I wrote to and refered to my earlier agreement, I immediatly paid £35 on account via their website and the seconf month I went to pay £35 and the account had been withdrawn, 2 weeks go AlLied contacted me and the whole bloody thing started again, I have started to pay Allied 35/month on account until the original agreement is resurected, Allied just keep ringing, shoutin at me and then putting the phone down, whats the point, has anyone ever had them take them to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have had dealings with AIC. They are an agressive lot. They have failed to respond to a Data Protection Act request from me. However after one to many time wasting telephone calls I wrote to them saying that we no longer deal with them on the telephone and sent them anti harassment letter available on here. They went quiet. The next thing we get is a letter from Equidebt. They AIC have abandoned the case. I think what they actually do is pass the cases around creating new case fees and charges each time. Note I am IFA acting pro bono for clients on debt management.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...oh and another thing, I have a feeling that they may 'buy' the debt from Natwest or whoever. Certainly Equident raised a lot of private equity money to do just that back in 2005 (I think). In any event I always ask them outright whether they are acting as agents for a proncipal or whether they have bought the debt. I also always ask them whether they are recording our conversation. If they say yes, I say excellent. It may also help if you record the conversations. I think the law says that you have to tell them if you are. Lolat70

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had setup a Debt Payment Plan with Promise Debt Solutions, and Payments were sent monthly to Moorcroft on behalf on Mint (RBS). I have 3 other creditors on this plan who ALWAYS recieved the payments monthly from Promise Monthly. Moorcroft on occasions did began to chase payments after the first few days of the month as the payments sent from Promise did not clear at the same time every month. Netherthless Payments were sent to them every month without fail. However I now without no warning have recieved a letter from AIC asking for the full payment to be made? The lady I spoke to was very unhelpful as would come as no surprise! She refused to listen to anything I said and just threatened some form of investigation then hanged up threatning legal action??? what is that all about? I contacted Promise as far as I am concerned my payments have been made with not ONE missed payment since going on the plan. Any ideas of where I go from here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Nasty barstewards this lot. I had them demanding to know where I worked and threatening me. I can hold my own when it comes to arguing on the phone but even I was shaking with rage after a couple of 'conversations'. Tell 'em to eff off. That seems the only sort of language they understand.

 

I am used to dealing with unpleasant people too, but when I got a phone call from them quite out of the blue, I just had a sore throat in having to shout to match their shouting and try to be heard. They are ignorant, would not listen, but their threats are scary. I am not one to be intimidated though and know they have to take me to court to get any further action, not that I am disputing debt, but I wanted to be advised officially that they were now handling the debt, and details of their banker so I could re-instate payments because I had not been advised debt transferred from Moorcroft. They accused me of lying when I said I do internet banking but do not have a checking account, and also one or two other things they said I was lying, so wish I had taped conversation to start slander proceedings against them. Anyhow, though shaken, I will fight, but a lesser person could easily have been reduced to tears. I must admit though, I am worried because if they insist on full repayment, I cant and only hope Courts will see sense. In this respect, can a creditor insist on full repayment (when I cant make it) or do they have to take Courts advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I am in same position, AIC not replying to any letters despite fact I send them by recorded delivery. But I spoke to a debt company and they say it is not true that if AIC does not comply with sending copy of agreement that the debt is forfeit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they cannot produce the CCA then the debt becomes unenforcable, the debt itself will still exist but they will have no way of forcing you to pay i.e through the courts.

 

TezViper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats my undertanding anyway.

:|

 

TezViper

TezViper

 

I give advice not as an expert on law, only as a guy who succesfully claimed back £3385 from The Halifax. Followed by another £2611.

 

Lloyds TSB settled in full before hearing

 

Cap One offered full settlement and default removed.

 

If I help in any way then please donate to the site when you are succesful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

Just to say I have had several (ignored) robot computer calls from AIC in the last few days, they are ignoring my CCA letter from about a month ago, whats the next step, I am a bit worried about doing nothing, 'head in sand' theory, do we have a reply to failing the CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

Just to say I have had several (ignored) robot computer calls from AIC in the last few days, they are ignoring my CCA letter from about a month ago, whats the next step, I am a bit worried about doing nothing, 'head in sand' theory, do we have a reply to failing the CCA?

 

 

If it's gone 12 working days then they have breached CCA and the debt is now in dispute so they can't pursue until CCA produced. After the 12 working days if they don't produce CCA within 30 extra days ( not working days just normal ) then they have committed a criminal offence.

 

It sounds as if your 12 days is well past but poss not the extra 30. If you sent your original request recorded delivery & kept a copy you have no need to remind them of their obligations under CCA regs. Sit tight!

 

If they then start pursuing you again you can approach your local trading stds. I would also recommend a complaint to the OFT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs - the OFT won't take complaint up on an individuals behalf ( thats why TS also good bet ) but they will keep complaints on file and they will monitor patterns of complaints eg for particular DCAs. The more people that complain the better chance there is of some of these companies having their consumer credit licence suspended or removed. Which means they can't trade as a DCA.

 

Keep us posted with how you get on

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

background to debt

I took out an agreement with VW in 2001. A few mths later I ran into financial difficulty and stayed in contact with them and let them know what happened.

I then got a default notice saying to pay a certain amt to prevent repossession. I sent a chq it was cashed and they still took the car!

It was recorded on my credit reference 5 yrs ago I just got a warning from bailiff for the o/s £6000+ which is the difference after they took the car to auction.

They took the car even though I made provisions to pay the arrears.:mad:

 

AIC chasing

I recieved a yellow slip from AIC in the post marked 'warning' get in contact. 3 days later I got a letter saying the usual final notice of Intent if you don't pay what can happen such as CCJ etc.

 

I phoned National Debtline 0808 808 4000 and was advised 1 of the options was to wait it out as the 6 year limit is 5 mths away alternatively I could S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) VW and argue that they were in breach of the contract as they wrongly took the car.

Then I received another letter 10 days later saying 'further to our conversation we will except the agreed £xxx...' which was about 30% of the original debt!:confused:

 

I NEVER PHONED OR TALKED TO ANYONE!!!

 

I am currently still ignoring it but now wondering if this is a tactic where they can say I have been in contact and so restart the whole 6 year period?

 

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all

 

I have an old debt with RBOS which was passed onto AIC, I paid them what i could here and there over a few years, when i missed a payment always got the nasty phone calls but just learned to ignore them and not answer when they came up on caller display.

 

In December last year I received a letter from Capquest saying they had bought the debt, all the paperwork was correct so i started paying them, now i am getting calls from AIC saying they know nothing about this and to resume paying them which I have refused. Capquest have advised me to ignore them.

 

Is there a process where I can request a statement from AIC of everything I have paid them over the years? and is there anywhere in RBOS that has a record of me?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...