Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I bought my house 2 years ago. The previous owner had died. I continue to recieve parking fines and communication from DVLA in the name of the dead person, despite contacting DVLA via post to inform them I am the new owner of the property. I have sent them proof of purchase and ownership but the communications continue to arrive. Aside from using "return to sender", does anyone have any idea how to stop this and get DVLA to update their records? Not sure if relevant but the Tax class on the vehicle is disabled meaning that the price of vehicle tax is £0 per year. I assume someone is using this to get free vehicle tax which is up to them, but I'm bored of fighting with parking charge companies and getting threatening letters, as whoever is doing this is also not very good at paying for parking.
    • I haven't heard of them asking for photographic evidence in this way before – but I don't think it will really pose a problem. Have you got a history of sending parcels which were then lost and you had to claim for? When you send your letter of claim? Was the item properly declared? Was the item correctly valued? Please answer these questions and then take at least a couple of days reading very thoroughly the stories on this sub- forum. There are lots of them. Read some of the pinned topics at the top which will explain the principles and then read the stories to see other people's experience. Post up your letter of claim in PDF format so we can see what you sent.  
    • Just to clarify - it was the lender who undertook works, not me.  They racked up huge huge sums in refurb costs - which were completely unnecessary.  They have been trying to charge all the costs to me.  I refuse to be held accountable in my defence and counterclaim.   (I refuse to  be held liable for these works costs whether vat was or wasn't added - I maintain its the lender that must cover the costs).  It was a ridiculous sum of money and made no difference to their ability to sell either.  As its still unsold.    I can see - from disclosure paperwork - that the lender ceo uses this contractor all the time on other properties - for himself and for the bank.  The payer may not be responsible for the contractor's failure to add vat - but the ceo can clearly see it's not being charged - and again and again on all his jobs.  So he is complicit even if not guilty of the actual fraud.    I admit I'm angry with them. The sheer injustice and arrogance (that they could/ can do whatever they want and get away with it - has been astounding.  It's why I have fought so hard to get justice.  This particular issue is just another niggle.  They think they are above the law; can circumvent it - with no consequences / repercussions.    Thank you dx for pointing me to the link. I will now follow that up
    • I have posted the letter off today - sent recorded delivery, so should get to the Police early next week. I also walked along the street where this happened and checked if there were any CCTV cameras or video door bells in that section of the road, but could only find one. I talked to the owners of the house with the camera but they say it is set to only cover the area leading up to the house and not really the pavement or road and footage also auto deletes after 72 hours, so anything captured would be gone now. That was disappointing. I walked along the road a bit more, but couldn't see any other video door bells or CCTV, so that didn't help.  I always thought most people have at least a video door bell these days but not in that road... 😐 So came home a bit disappointed.  If anything else happens I will post an update here, but may not be for a week or so. Not sure how long this will take now.
    • Hi all.   I've just cancelled my Virgin Media because my Wife and I are going abroad for 12 months or so. My Son will be staying in our home, and wishes to start a contract with them. He signed up to a great deal for New Customers online, and a Contract Agreement was signed online. He had a delivery date for a Self Installation Kit but it never arrived. After speaking to numerous Virgin Media Staff online, they are insisting that he calls their Pre Installation Team (I presume that is their sales Team to try and get more money). He doesn't want to speak to them over the phone. He doesn't mind doing a Live Chat, but he hasn't got an Account Number yet, so that's impossible. He even had a chat with a Team Member on Whatsapp, who say they don't have access to the information they need, so he has no option but to call them. Why can't they just be straightforward with their Communications? Is there any other option other than calling them?   TIA.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Smart Parking charge ,Haven Banks Exeter.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Every one,

 

Please help/Advise.

 

I was photographed entering the haven banks car park on the 22/dec/2017 at 11.42am.

 

Paid £1.00 for 2hrs /120mins parking at 11.46.

 

Was then photographed leaving at 14.03pm on the same day.

 

Unfortunately I entered the last two digit's of my registration wrong ****LKX when it should of been ****LXK.

 

So received a parking charge letter on the 01/01/2018 stating that I needed to pay £54.00within 14 days ,if I was to appeal and fail this would go up to £90.00.

 

I of course contacted Smart Parking and forwarded on the parking ticket which I paid for hoping they would see scene and cancel the charge.(Ya Right!).

 

There letter arrived on the 27/01/2018 ,stating that as the motorist and that there are signs clearly stating not to make mistakes it was my fault. Also I was over my paid 120mins by 20mins.(I understand that this is the 5mins entering the car park parking and paying for ticket and the 15mins leaving).

 

I again appealed To POPLA, stating that I was in my car within my paid time ,but due to the excessive amount of vehicle's entering/leaving this car park over the xmas period ,I was unable leave hence the 10 to 15min wait ,but didn't realise I was over my time when I eventually drove out.

 

But on the 5/3/2017 while POPLA agreed the wrong reg details should cause the fine my overstay still did. So the charge is £90.00

 

Sorry that there's so much to read , I have all letters and the £1.00 parking ticket so can forward them on .

 

haven't paid the charge yet ,hoping there's some one that will advise me.

 

Cheers

Edited by DragonFly1967
Added spacing.
Link to post
Share on other sites

This one is easy.

 

Do absolutely nothing!

 

When you say you forwarded the P&D ticket to Daft Parking... You mean a copy of it right, not the original?

 

Can you scan in and upload (

 

Entering the wrong registration number is not a cause for action and Daft Parking know it. They are one of the companies that have been spanked in court for trying this.

 

They might be trying to get you for the *alleged* overstay. But if you were queuing to leave the car park then you could not also have been parked. So that's a non starter too.

 

Havens Bank is a well known site on here. Have a read of some of the other Havens Bank threads. https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-0964707606882478:652l7hswbgv&ie=UTF-8&q=havens+bank&sa=Search+CAG#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=havens%20bank&gsc.page=1

 

So, upload what you have and let's have a proper look and we'll see what we can do to beat these clowns :thumb:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you also have a look at this post and then copy & paste the relevant bits (along with your answers) back to this thread.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement 22 /12 /2017

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 01/01/2018

 

3 Date received 3/01/2018

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?]not sure

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?yes

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal]yes & lost

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up yes

 

7 Who is the parking company?smart parking

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Haven Banks Retail Pk,Exeter

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under POPLA

Letters.pdf

Edited by DragonFly1967
Added redacted PDF
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well. You've done all that you can now. The Hoopla decision isn't binding on you, so sit back and enjoy all the junk mail that you're going to be getting from Daft, their pet DCA and then their pet snake (solicitor).

 

Both Daft parking and Hoopla seem to think that a) a small inconsequential human error makes the PCN valid, and b) Parking is the same as queuing. Neither is true.

 

So if they want to take this any further, unless Daft parking supply their own Judge, I can see snowballs and hell in their future. :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi everyone,

just a quick update and not including the initial letter from Smart Parking .

 

I have received three DRP (debt Recovery Plus Ltd) (2 in Apr &1 may) asking for the money £160. within the 1st sentence it states 'Most people pay their parking charges straightaway' Well I wont!!!

 

Then a change to Zenith Collections (same company but different letter heading I'm sure) in which I now have two letters (1 in May & 1 in June) asking for the £160.00 .

 

Each time demanding the money or they would advise to take court action(bring it on), But always Extending the deadline.

 

I only hope that one day this car park changes its ways, I have not once set foot or placed a car wheel onto their property and never will do again due to the way they behave.

Cheers all...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

This car park has shown up time and time again so it begs this question. Why this particular site? I have looked on Google Street View and there seems to be no reason why this is happening. As it was near Christmas, you would expect that it's hard to find a space in the first place and then the queues leaving and SP should have allowed for that. If they chose to go to court, I would say that any reasonable judge would take that into consideration.

 

 

 

The fact you mistyped your reg number is neither here nor there. You paid for parking so any claim will (in my opinion) fail.

 

 

You are quite correct that Zenith are DR+: just another desk in the same office.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have form here and you need to acquaint yourself of all the other postings about the site, including the ones on the parking pranksters blog. if they do try and get tough you can let them know that they have been rumbled and you will be quoting all of the other dodgy demands to show that their system isnt fit for purpose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...