Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well that will lead to more backdoor CCJs. I think you need to complain to all and sundry.  Let's start with the BPA.  The BPA are PE's mates, so they will never decide that PE have done anything wrong.  But that's not the point, correspondence between the two may lead to PE promising to write to the Scottish address, which is all you want.  Check the below for accuracy as methinks you have sent more correspondence that what I've quoted.  How about something like - Dear BPA, Re : Parkingeye Ltd PCN no.XXXXX, Claim no.XXXXX PCN no.XXXXX I am writing to complain about your above-mentioned member. I understand of course that you cannot enter into the merits of why a PCN was issued. The reason for my complaint is that, instead of writing to me at my address at XXXXX, Scotland, your member insists in writing to me at XXXXX, England, which is an address which I have never lived at.  I have always resided at the Scottish address.  The address registered with the DVLA for the vehicle is my Scottish address. I first because aware of this mess when the person who lives at the English address kindly contacted me, to tell me that a County Court Judgement for me had arrived at that address.  I requested that Parking Eye agree to a set aside by consent.  However, they refused.  I ended up paying £XXX despite having had no chance to defend myself. Regardng the second PCN, I attach correspondence dated XX February and XX March.  The latter was a complaint - which your operator has completely ignored.  Even worse, they have instructed debt collecting agencies twice to write to the English address.  On top of this, the person at the English address is moving out next week which means I am in danger a second time of losing a court case by default. I would therefore like to complain about your operator and would request that you instruct them to do what should be a simple thing - to write to me at my correct address. Yours, XXXXX
    • The lucky winner put the £100 into Premium Bonds just over a year ago. Check who scooped the £1million jackpot and all other major prices above £1,000 in our tables.View the full article
    • Hello DX -  So an update:  Resolvecall have written to say they have closed the account with them and passed it back to Capquest after receipt of my SB letter. Capquest have written twice, once offering a payment plan and the second letter after receiving my SB letter saying they are looking into my complaint and will respond within 8 weeks.   Absolutely no mention of what the debt is, was or from when or any details still.   Is this a case now of waiting to see what they come back with or is now the moment for me to send another letter via Solicitor please?
    • It's about telling a story: Ian King on finance in the UKView the full article
    • Working on WS, get that in the post then contact sols is the plan. The sol has misgendered me in their WS
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest and old HBOS Aqua Card Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2220 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Afternoon,

 

I am writing her on behalf of my partner (debtor), who is not in a position to write themselves. For ease in translation I will write in the first person.

 

In a nutshell

 

In 2007 I took out an Aqua Credit card.

In 2010 I got in to financial difficulties and defaulted (outstanding balance approximately £1500).

The debt was sold on to CAPQUEST in December 2010.

 

After some correspondence between myself and CAPQUEST I took it upon myself to set up a Standing Order in favour of CAPQUEST for £5.00 per month effective from May 2011.

 

Details of the AQUA account were filed away and buried in the loft years ago and as the Standing Order was being paid from an overlooked bank sub-account I rarely visit (changed banking method),

I forgot all about the debt and Standing Order.

I did not receive any communication from CAPQUEST from this point, even when I told them I was moving.

 

In the intervening period I have moved a couple of times.

I informed CAPQUEST of the first move, but not the second.

To be honest, so many years had passed and with no annual statements or communication with CAPQUEST I forgot they even existed until recently.

 

In October last year I received a letter from CAPQUEST stating they had just purchased the account and requesting I telephone them to discuss repayment.

 

At first,

I thought CAPQUEST were chasing a Statute Barred debt.

I wrote to CAPQUEST stating the account was Statute Barred.

They responded confirming that they had receive a recent payment of £5.00 which confirmed the account was not Statute Barred.

 

After a little digging around in a dusty loft I found my old AQUA file,

where documents confirmed CAPQUEST had been assigned the account in December 2010 (not October 2017 as they were now suggesting),

and a document confirming the outstanding balance of £1503.00 – not the £1976.00 now being claimed.

 

Having established the debt was still ‘live’ and not Statute Barred, I made a CCA request. CAPQUEST returned the attached.

 

I would be extremely grateful if someone could look at the attached and advise if this agreement is valid.

 

Once I have a response, I will continue with the rest of the story and what has happened to date, including the results of a SAR.

 

Many thanks in anticipation…

AQUA REDACTED UNSIGNED AGREEMENT.pdf

AQUA REDACTED SIGNED AGREEMENT.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks ok

 

they cant increase the debt mind

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100uk

- I thought they could add interest?

 

I thought I had read somewhere that not adding interest after the assignment is only a recommendation (in FCA CONC?).

 

I would love someone to signpost me to something that confirms they are not allowed to add interest and charges, as this might give me some leverage.

 

The added interest of circa £500 is a funny one.

They only added it for a specific period and, if my maths is correct, does not appear to relate to interest rates in the original CCA.

 

I will post a lot more detail on the matter of the added interest soon.

 

I need to redact and scan in the statement and consider the response I have received today to a complaint I submitted to CAPQUEST

Link to post
Share on other sites

did the OC terminate the agreement and send a default notice?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please DN and TN if you have them

scan to PDF

 

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

termination notice if one was issued...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been through all the documents that CAPQUEST have sent me in response to my SAR.

 

There is no DN or TN.

 

I am still checking my old AQUA file, but have not found any DN or TN either.

 

Please find attached a chronology to date.

 

I am still working on it and will amend as documents/events come to light.

 

With regard to the SAR,

the response has missed several documents that I have copies of.

 

Mainly letters I wrote to CAPQUEST.

 

Additionally, there are documents I have never seen before (constructed?)

.Is this grounds for a further complaint?

 

And here is the statement they sent me (first since 2009) in response to my recent request.

 

Take a look at Page 2 and the addition of the interest lump sum.

 

Following my complaint, they have since sent me a more detailed statement, showing alleged interest added per month, saying the 'lump sum' appears as they transferred systems!

 

The interest rate does not relate to that stated in the CCA and is only applied during a specific period - strange.

170112-Redacted Pompey v CASPQUEST Chronology.pdf

171124-Statement.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

who was the sar too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CAPQUEST.

 

I think it may be pointless sending a SAR to AQUA, as the a/c was assigned in 2010 and AQUA probably would not have retained any records from that long ago - but then again, if you think it might be worth it I have no problem sending another SAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

now send one to the oc

pointless sending sar's to a dca,

they can make up whatever they want.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR sent to AQUA today.

 

Any advice on the interest the DCA has applied to the account?

 

In their letter of 06.10.2017, they write "we will not add interest to this account" - clearly this is not the case.

 

I did point this out to the DCA in my complaint, but they ignored me, just confirming they had added interest - no explanation of why and why only in a specific period or an explanation of the rate they have applied

Link to post
Share on other sites

get all the info 1st

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been through my old AQUA file and scanned all documents in as PDF. Please see attached chronology.

 

There are three statements 15.07.2009, 14.08.2009 & 15.09.2009 which contain reference to 'Notice of Default Sums' (see attached scan). There are no documents that I hold that constitute a bona fide DN or TN, but I will have to wait and see what the AQUA SAR turns up.

 

How do I delete uploaded files from my cache please?

140809-POSSIBLE DN WORDING.pdf

170118-REDACTED Chronology.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

under user cp

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think one of your main problems is you continue to have entered into so much totally pointless letter tennis

once a CCA is failed

you stop all comms until/unless you get a letter before action/of claim or a claimform.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received the SAR response from AQUA.

 

There is no DN or TN.

 

Interestingly, they have provided copies of monthly statements since 24.07.2013 to 25.06.2017.

Bare in mind I have a NoA in favour of CAPQUEST dated December 2010.

 

All statements show a balance outstanding £1,503.54 which is obviously different from the £1,971.83 now being claimed by CAPQUEST

Link to post
Share on other sites

could be fatal if CQ want to do court then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets see what they do eh?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Any news

this is identical to what i am going through with Capquest and Marbles funny enough,

 

mine has been passed to NCO Now but my credit file keeps having late payments against it for last 2 month after 8 years of on time payments with payplan

 

i am screwed as i rang marbles and they have nothing on file as it has been later than 6 years

 

Capquest say they cannot deal with it as NCO are dealing with it

 

all my other accounts have been wiped as 6 years and older except this one

( which i am sure would have defaulted at the same time 2008 )

but capquest say it is a live credit account?

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?485106-Default-Date-confusion&p=5099570#post5099570

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...