Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dart Charge PCN


bjt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I received a PCN today from Dart Charge.

 

I don't dispute the charge as I did use the tunnel (both ways), but, forgot to go online to pay!

 

I go online to make the payment,

fill in everything they ask for,

press continue,

and it tells me that £5 has been accepted and I'll receive a receipt later.

 

The PCN clearly states £35 or £70 for late payment,

The £5 is, I believe, the actual charge for using the crossing.

 

I decide to use the telephone number they provide, and speak to an agent.

Explain what I've done and how I couldn't actually pay the full amount.

 

He tells me that that is all I have to pay because I haven't used the crossing before, and it was just a reminder to pay!

 

It clearly states that,

"in addition to the penalty charge you must also pay the applicable Road user charge of £2.50".

 

I can't help thinking that I'll receive another PCN in 28 days,

telling me that my fine has increased to £70 for failing to pay within the 14 days!

 

The contravention date was the 3/12/17.

The issue date is 14/12/17.

 

Would they really send out a PCN,

without expecting full payment?

Do you think I should try and contact them again after I receive the receipt for my £5?

Any thoughts would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think it's wrong then appeal. But remember you lose the discount if they find against you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Renegade, no, I don't think it's wrong,

 

I can't understand why they would send a PCN,

when a reminder to pay would be sufficient.

 

Having used the crossing,

one has until midnight the following day to make the payment.

 

Due to a lapse in memory,

I didn't conform,

and accepted that I would have to pay the penalty!

 

However,

what I don't want is that penalty to be doubled because I failed to respond within the 14 days.

I just wonder if any one else has been in the same predicament?

Regards,

BJT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the reminder was dated 14th

then its 14 days from THEN before it increases to £70

 

you paid £2.50 each way =£5

you are finished

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX,

I do understand what your saying, "if it was a reminder", but, that's the point, it wasn't a reminder, it was a PCN telling me that I had 14 days from the date of the letter to pay £35 plus the cost of using the crossing i.e. £5.

 

Their website didn't indicate anywhere that I would only have to pay the crossing fee within the 14 days.

 

As already stated, you have until midnight the next day to pay the crossing charge, after that, you are in default, hence, £35.

 

I've received the receipt now (online) and it clearly states Payment Type - Credit.

Card Type - Visa. Type - Purchase.

 

To me, this would indicate that all I've paid is the actuall fee, not the fine!

 

Oh well, I'll just sit on this and wait, and if I get the notification that my fine is now increased to £70, then, at least I have my receipt to show that I tried to pay, when I appeal.

Thanks again,

BJT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you've no read the website correctly

it says:

First-time ‘offenders’ will be given a 14-day grace period when the charge notice is sent out. This allows them to pay the original charge rather than the full fine.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

I go online to make the payment,

fill in everything they ask for,

press continue,

and it tells me that £5 has been accepted and I'll receive a receipt later.

 

 

 

You only had until midnight the day after the crossing to pay the fee, if you were later than that, the payment is held as a credit for future crossings and not accepted for that earlier crossing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doh!!! Thanks Dx. Your quite right, I didn't read the website! Just went straight to the payment section!

That's good, I can order a takeaway curry now to celebrate! Lol.

Thanks again,

BJT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The contravention date was the 3/12/17. +14 = 17

paid within the newbie grace period

 

and infact its even better than that

you get 14 days from the date of the PCN if you are a 1st time user

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You only had until midnight the day after the crossing to pay the fee, if you were later than that, the payment is held as a credit for future crossings and not accepted for that earlier crossing.

 

Thanks for that. So, I've paid for a crossing that might never take place! And, presumably, by what you say, I'm still liable for the original transgression?

Cheers, BJT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

you have the payment ref number

simply type it in and it will tell you what its related too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your replies.

 

I really appreciate your help, and the speed of your responses!

 

Wishing you all a good xmas and a happy new year.

 

Regards,

 

BJT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update.

 

I phoned them just now,

to see if I still owed them,

 

was told that the £5 was all I needed to pay as this was my first time!

(Thanks DX).

 

So, that's two confirmations from them.

I'm happy now.

Thanks again for your help.

 

Regards,

 

BJT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to keep on about this, but, this will be the last post on this subject.

 

Today I received another letter from Dart Charge, with a heading, WARNING LETTER.

 

It goes on to say,

"Maybe you didn't know about the Dart Charge scheme or simply forgot to pay?

 

If you pay your outstanding crossing charge(s) by 28/12/2017-

- we'll cancel this penalty charge notice".

 

We only offer this option on your first penalty charge--so, be sure to pay in the future!

 

I still can't understand why I got a PCN first?

 

Surely the Warning Letter should have been sent out first?

 

The mind boggles!

Thanks again.

BJT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the charge must have a ref number

check that number against the payment you made

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...