Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Bookmakers use betting on political events to entice new customers, and say it is growing.View the full article
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell - mediated settlement, settled the debt - now chasing again claim they have CCJ


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2585 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is not for me but for my ex partner

 

In 2013 she got a claim form for on old Three debt

(sent to my address she she had not lived for 12 plus years)

 

I helped her with the claim form and to cut the story short she went into mediation and agreed a settlement.

Which she paid by DD to the account as specified by Lowell/Howard Cohen.

So all paid up and completed, no CCJ, no action, no more letters.

 

Now jump forward to 2017,

letters start coming through my letter box from Lowell for her, which I pass on.

They claim the debt is still owed,

they have CCJ

and now if she doesn't pay up (again) they will enforce the CCJ they think they have.

 

Any advice I can pass on.

 

There have been a number of letters now and I am thinking that she goes for harassment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check her credit file, or Trust Online and see if they're telling the truth about the CCJ.

 

Why are you still receiving letters for her after all this time?

 

The only way they would have got a CCJ, was by default, ie. they would have sent a claim form to your address, which you then ignored, then they will have been unchallenged in court hence winning by default?

 

As long as she has evidence that the CCJ was settled, then this is either another debt they have or completely bogus and they're chancing their arm?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

had her for a mug then...

 

 

99% of mobile debts are made of charges of the remaining time till end of contract

which are unfair and can be defended.

 

 

if £255 is cheaper than paying the balance go get the CCJ set aside

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing we did was check her credit file - NOTHING,

did a check on Trust Online again -NOTHING as I thought.

 

 

They issued the claim form and it was addressed to my house

- she defended and settled.

 

 

She already had correspondence at her previous and current address to/from Lowell at the time

so they had correct details,

they obviously tried to get default judgment as this was a previous address

(and is associated by being on the mortgage).

 

I know they are chancing their arm as they are asking for the original amount,

not the amount they claimed on the form i.e. plus fees/costs etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the letters up please to one multipage pdf

follow upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But no CCJ is registered on her files?

 

Hmmm, don't know if they're willy waving, first thoughts are that they are otherwise, they would have carried out their threat and sent bailiffs in if they're that confident!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write back to Lowell addressed to Head of Legal/Compliance, pointing out that the account was settled after communications in 2013 with Lowell/Howard Cohen. Payments were made to a specified account. Suggest that they check back at their accounts records as you are not going to the time/expense to provide own records.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

is that all the letters

what about the old stuff.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't got access to those at the moment but will ask her,

 

I do have the text of the court mediation settlement agreement (removed any data that might identify)

 

 

MEDIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

 

Name of court

 

County Court Money Claims Centre

Claim No.

 

 

Name of Claimant

 

The Lowell Group Enterprise

Name of Defendant

 

 

 

 

On the xx September 2013 the parties agreed that:

 

Terms:-

 

1. The defendant will pay the claimant the sum of £350.00 in full and final settlement of this case the payment to be made by instalments of £50.00 each month beginning on the xx October 2013 and ending on the xx April 2014.

 

2. In the event of default by the defendant, to pay the sum agreed on the xx September 2013 the claimant shall be at liberty, at the Claimant’s option to:

(a) apply to the court for summary judgment for the unpaid balance of the settlement sum; or

(b) apply to the court to restore the claim.

 

3. The agreement is in full and final settlement of this claim.

 

4. The court will adjourn the case generally with permission to restore, and the claim will be struck out without further order of the court if not restored by the xx July 2014.

 

5. The parties will keep the information contained in this agreement confidential and not use it for any collateral or ulterior purposes. Other than a final written agreement, any information – whether written in a document prepared for mediation or written or spoken during the mediation – can only be used for the purpose of mediation and cannot be referred to in any court action unless the parties agree. The parties agree that they will not call the mediator to give evidence in any court action.

 

Claimant: Acceptance email attached, or otherwise signature below.

 

Signed:

 

Defendant: Acceptance email attached, or otherwise signature below.

 

Signed:

 

Date

 

 

Date:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a copy of the above...

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...