Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Unviversal Credit CCJ, Sold to paragon , now Arrows and restons


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2690 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 486
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hi all,

just to let you know...

rang st albans yesterday and today,although the clerk couldn't explain why my application for it to be struck out was "ignored" thought maybe it had to be and "official" application complete with fee, as i have done this time.

willing to provide any papers i think i may need for this time around, although both times the clerks were "amazed" that the claim was back in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First, be ready for a surprise attack from Arrow/Copes at the last moment. By that I mean that they write to the court a day or so before the hearing asking for an adjournment. Second, they could also send you all the documents needed for their case to arrive on the morning of the hearing in a letter dated a week or so earlier. Do not get flustered by these tactics. Just keep calm and remember that they have pi**ed off the court once, so they will be on the back foot to start with.

what would be their ultimate aim in doing these things, apart from giving themselves more time and delaying, hopefully, the inevitable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stephen

 

You assume they have staff with a brain who can think! Don't be so charitable.

 

Doc

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

me too. lol

thought maybe i had been at godmothers alcohol for a sec there

u can have it if u want i still have loads left.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi again everyone,

got just under 2 weeks before my hearing and would like to clear some things in my mind before then.

1. i have original POC and POC from this time.

2. I have original defence and defence from this time.

3. A copy of my AQ.

4. The strike out from the original claim.

is there anything else i need to take with me?

a couple of other things.

will this hearing only deal with my application to have the case struck out again? or, if i am unsuccessful, will it also deal with their application?

are arrow supposed to provide me with any paperwork before hand? ( i have heard nothing from them at all.)

if they are, and they don't. what is my situation then?

what is the situation if they don't appear?

any thoughts or ideas on these gratefully received.

fingers crossed for 2 weeks time

Link to post
Share on other sites

personally i would take anything with you that u might need this could even be the whole of the original file as the judge may aske for summing that is in there.

 

Also i would make sure the letter that says they have to pay u costs is there just basically take everything with you. Also make sure u have a pad of paper and pens with you as u may want to make the odd note to bring back to the table later when they are talking to the judge or answering questions posed to them.

 

The court claim should deal with your request for strike out and any objection they have on it it may also deal with there application, can u just remind me what there application is about if it is not to have the case re instated.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think that is best as u may need summing u have left @ home.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi all,

just got back. and not good news, ........... i lost.

arrow had a local litigator present, who, unfortunately seemed very friendly with the judge. ( not that i am insinuating anything)

the judge decided to reject my application, as, in his opinion, the case has not already had a hearing.the original case had been struck out solely on the opinion of the st. albans judge, who should have given arrow time to rectify the application, then had a hearing, and as he didn't, there was no hearing so Res Judicate does not apply.

he has even allowed them permission to alter this one as some figures. etc are incorrect.

i now have to decide wether to accept arrow's new figures, dispute all or part of it. ( i may still be able to use the statute barred and no default notice side of it, i think)

so. now looking for help and advice on the upcoming case( by the way, he did compliment me on my defence, so thank you paul and everyone else. you did a good job)

looking forward to hearing all your thoughts on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all,

just got back. and not good news, ........... i lost.

arrow had a local litigator present, who, unfortunately seemed very friendly with the judge. ( not that i am insinuating anything)

the judge decided to reject my application, as, in his opinion, the case has not already had a hearing.the original case had been struck out solely on the opinion of the st. albans judge, who should have given arrow time to rectify the application, then had a hearing, and as he didn't, there was no hearing so Res Judicate does not apply.

he has even allowed them permission to alter this one as some figures. etc are incorrect.

i now have to decide wether to accept arrow's new figures, dispute all or part of it. ( i may still be able to use the statute barred and no default notice side of it, i think)

so. now looking for help and advice on the upcoming case( by the way, he did compliment me on my defence, so thank you paul and everyone else. you did a good job)

looking forward to hearing all your thoughts on this

have we had the agreement yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you mean the credit agreement? if so, i received a copy of the original agreement with the papers arrow filed with the court, one puzzling thing though, i signed on the 24 oct, the other persons signature is dated 16 nov.

Link to post
Share on other sites

stephen7

 

Typical of a 'old pals' lawyer & DJ.

 

Don't worry about this now. It's only a preliminary and the main action is to follow. Try to put today to one side for a couple of days (especially as you are working at night) and come back to it in a few days.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again all,

feeling human again, so time to try and get things arranged.

the judge stated that the hearing will be in about 6 weeks. he has given arrow 2 weeks from their receipt of the court letter to respond with their statement. the letter should be sent to them by the end of this week, so i should have their statement by about 14th march.i then have 2 weeks to respond with mine.

therefore, can anyone who has been following this advise me on what my options now are and ( in their opinion) the best way forward?

can i still fight this or is it a case of cutting my losses and try to come to an agreement with them.( though, going by their past record with me, i don't believe they will accept anything i offer)

lookinh forward to hearing all your thoughts on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't much you can do unitl you get their amended claim. But just like they were able to use defence from the first case, you should be able to use theirs. Hang on in there, its a long road ahead bu you will succeed. Post up their amended POC when you receive them.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

docman,

thanks for replying,

i assumed that as the last hearing dismissed my application to have it struck out, then that was that, i would have to accept the ccj, and just argue over the figures. what is reality and what they say differs by over £4000.00.they did also apply for almost £2000.00 costs also, but the judge told them they foot their own costs, thankfully.

will post details as soon as i get them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stephen

 

Slightly confused by your reference to a CCJ as in

 

" assumed that as the last hearing dismissed my application to have it struck out, then that was that, i would have to accept the ccj, and just argue over the figures."

 

I thought Arrow hadn't produced evidence to back up their claim.

 

Can you expand?

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...