Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In short you never communicate with a Debt Collector, they have no power here at all. The snotty letter is only used to respond to a properly worded Letter Before Claim. The only time you would be recommended to contact the PPC is to send the snotty letter. You do nothing but keep the tripe they send you unless you receive a letter before claim.
    • Probably to do with the Creditor accepting the reduced payments claim as part of the IVA. - Thats my guess anyway.  As for the mount outstanding... 60k is incredible and im pretty sure a DRO wouldnt cover that much even after the new legislation.    For you @Alfy - Please stay headstrong and stop worrying. My viewpoint on debt with debt collectors is simple. You are a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a database for them to run a collection cycle through.  They dont care about emotions or your situation, they just care about paying off their shareholders and trying to turn a profit.  They use varying tactics to increase the pressure on you to the point where you will break. People then fall for this an either cave in to DCAs before doing their own due diligence on the debts that are purchased or turn to IVAs like you have.    They are better ways to handle this and Im glad you feel better after a good nights sleep - I hope you can keep it up. 
    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax Credit Overpayment and Advantis


bitemarx
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2707 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was receiving tax credits roughly between late 2012 and mid 2014.

Around early 2014, HMRC wrote to me asking for identification documents for my older child (possibly both children, I don't clearly recall, unfortunately), but I was not able to submit this due to the fact that my older child's passport (not british) had expired. Nevertheless, I sent this passport to HMRC in the hope that they would accept it. They did not

I had to send the passport away for renewal, and I confess that I did not get on this immediately; it may have been a few months later that I sent it, because I was moving from one city to another while being unemployed.

I eventually got around to getting the passport renewed and sent it to hmrc, but they rejected it stating that the deadline had passed (or something) and the matter had now become an overpayment of £4400 which they intended to reclaim.

I sent various letters and made some phone calls over a matter of months to explain to them that this overpayment is not a valid overpayment since the child exists!

HMRC will not budge from repealing this "overpayment" decision and intend to reclaim it from me.

They passed it on to ADVANTIS who contacted me through various channels for a few months, after which they sent a letter stating that collection activity on my account had ceased and the account has been passed back to HMRC.

Again, I contacted HMRC but they are adamant that this overpayment will have to paid back no matter what the circumstances.

I make close to £1200 a month, and have no other source of income than the full time job that I have now. My spouse does not work. I get no benefits, except child benefit which goes to my spouse.

I have recently sent a 'dispute' to HMRC which they have rejected stating that the three month period is over. Today, I have sent two more letters, viz. a complaint and a letter stating that there has been an official error.

(I attach the wording of the letters to this post. Please could someone comment on this and advise if I need to include more detail?)

In the meantime, I have also sent an application for tax credits since I am seriously on the brink of a situation where the basic necessities of the household may be affected. This application has not even had an acknowledgment sent to me! And when I spoke to them about it via telephone, they say that no application was received.

If the HMRC do not respond or remedy this, I plan to go to the independent adjudicator, and then the ombudsman =, if necessary.

ANy thoughts, advice would be immensely helpful!

Official Error Letter for CAG forum upload.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice would be to send a complaint letter to HMRC and see what happens. You are a long way from the adjudicator or ombudsman as HMRCs complaints process must be exhausted.

 

In the meantime HMRC can chase the debt so you should ask them to put it on hold.

 

With regard to the ID the adjudicator would unlikely find in your favor as HMRC can ask for valid ID and you must have valid ID with them within 30 days.

 

First step is to put the word COMPLAINT in bold at the top of your letter and send to HMRC.

 

Step 2 is to ask for it to be looked at again.

 

Step 3 is a review by the team in Belfast.

 

Only then can you consider the adjudicator.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
My advice would be to send a complaint letter to HMRC and see what happens. You are a long way from the adjudicator or ombudsman as HMRCs complaints process must be exhausted.

 

In the meantime HMRC can chase the debt so you should ask them to put it on hold.

 

With regard to the ID the adjudicator would unlikely find in your favor as HMRC can ask for valid ID and you must have valid ID with them within 30 days.

 

First step is to put the word COMPLAINT in bold at the top of your letter and send to HMRC.

 

Step 2 is to ask for it to be looked at again.

 

Step 3 is a review by the team in Belfast.

 

Only then can you consider the adjudicator.

 

 

 

Thank you for your reply!

 

I've received a letter from HMRC in response to my complaint.

 

I'm attaching it to this post.

 

At this stage, do I write back and ask for this to be looked at again?

 

Also, is there a particular format to request the HMRC to stop collection acitivity on this debt?

Tax credits complaint HMRC response 14 Novermber 2016 page 2.jpg

Tax credits complaint HMRC response 14 NOvember 2016 Page 1 COPY.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As 2#, https://www.gov.uk/tax-credits-appeals-complaints/disagree-with-a-tax-credits-decision, follow the guidance for asking for Mandatory Reconsideration, but you will likely be told you are outside the timescale if you can't show good reason for not acting within them. Then if necessary follow the appeal process. They may consider reducing the repayment amounts in the meantime, but they are unlikely to put them on hold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Tax Credit Overpayment and Advantis
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...