Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS polled FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Unknown lowell CCJ from two years ago....OD debt....Help please!


dean5279
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2789 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI

 

Hopefully someone can help me,

i really don't know what to do next.

 

i admit a few years ago i ran into a few problems and didn't keep up to date with outstanding credit accounts, the old bury my head in the sand.

 

I have being trying to get things in order and recently got my clear score credit report,

to my shock i had a CCJ for an outstanding overdraft which was being chased by Lowell.

 

As far as i remember i had a £1400 overdraft which i left unpaid. That was in 2009.

i moved house in 2011 and never heard any more about it, although i have had other lowell communications over the last few years

 

. I contacted lowell to ask for details and they informed me the CCJ was taken out in 2012 although the credit report says 2014.

 

They informed me i have arrears on the agreement of £1000 and must start paying £50 per month right away or they would take further action.

 

My main question is

do i have any rights to have this set aside

, Lowell have obviously had my latest addresses over the the last few years

why is the first I've heard about it when i got a credit report.

 

And also the overdraft was £1400 but the debt they are claiming i owe is £2605,

is there any way i can challenge this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you replied to any letter on any debt sent to your present address from Lowell's?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see anything you can really do sadly then

Certainly setaside wise

You didn't inform your creditors of a change of address

So they quite correctly and legally filed to the address the credit was taken out at

 

Even if this weren't the case...

You'd still need a defence anyway

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't see anything you can really do sadly then

Certainly setaside wise

You didn't inform your creditors of a change of address

So they quite correctly and legally filed to the address the credit was taken out at

 

Even if this weren't the case...

You'd still need a defence anyway

 

Dx

Thanks, can I not do anything about the amount being nearly double what I originally borrowed, surely that can't be right ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

disregard what lowells say on the phone and you should NEVER EVER ring a fleecing dca.

 

 

so they now know your real address I take it you confirmed that?

 

 

get an sar running to the original creditor who was?

 

 

when did you take the account out

and when did you last pay them anything or use the account?

 

 

there would have to be a clear 6yrs from the date of your last pay/use to the date of the claimform [about 1 month before the CCJ date to make it statute barred.

 

 

phone northant bulk

ask for a copy of the CCJ

you'll need the CCJ number

either from your credit file

or from trustonline site first mind.

 

 

yo MIGHT be able to dispute the amount of the debt should there be lots of penalty charges

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pity you rang them and brought it to their attention.....as you have never paid anything towards the judgment dated 2012...you only had 2 years + to run then they would have had great difficulty in taking any further action.

If they now start to pressure you...may be wise to submit an N245 and agree an easy affordable monthly payment......but only if you are sure they will take further action.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

disregard what lowells say on the phone and you should NEVER EVER ring a fleecing dca.

 

 

so they now know your real address I take it you confirmed that?

 

 

get an sar running to the original creditor who was?

 

 

when did you take the account out

and when did you last pay them anything or use the account?

 

 

there would have to be a clear 6yrs from the date of your last pay/use to the date of the claimform [about 1 month before the CCJ date to make it statute barred.

 

 

phone northant bulk

ask for a copy of the CCJ

you'll need the CCJ number

either from your credit file

or from trustonline site first mind.

 

 

yo MIGHT be able to dispute the amount of the debt should there be lots of penalty charges

 

Thanks for replying..........The strange thing is i have lowell letters to my address but this lowell i have spoken to via email say they dont know my address and i need to confirm it so they can send me copies of the original agreements, as yet i havent confirmed.

 

I know it wont be statute barred as the CCJ date (they claim 2012) on my credit file is 2014, i last used the account in 2009.

 

The account was with Halifax, i will try and get a copy of the CCJ today and take it from there, thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right so im an idiot, i did confirm my current address to them in the first few emails i sent to them, they asked for my address to confirm my details due to the data protection act, i only gave them my current address so obviously they did have my current address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No that's good they now have your current address

If you could prove they knew that before the CCJ you have the start of a set aside

But you'd still need acdefence for the debt.

 

Phishing letters that go unanswered don't cut it in terms of proof

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No that's good they now have your current address

If you could prove they knew that before the CCJ you have the start of a set aside

But you'd still need acdefence for the debt.

 

Phishing letters that go unanswered don't cut it in terms of proof

 

So is the best thing to give them a CCA ?, forgive me im new to all this. if the judgement was set aside would this become statute barred or would that not come into this?

 

In terms of a defense i dont deny i owe them money its just the amount, an extra £1200 on an original balance of £1400.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But you need proof of wrong amount

Sar Halifax

 

CCA is no good on an overdraft

 

Claim form pauses SB clock so set aside makes no odds to that as all it does is set it back to the claim issue stage

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...