Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, below is a draft of the letter Address: Hugo Martin Director of Legal and Company Secretary EVRi Parcelnet Ltd trading as Evri CAPITOL HOUSE, 1, CAPITOL CLOSE LEEDS LS27 0WH REQUEST OF CONTRACTS      Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing in regards to the ongoing small claims case ____. In your Defendant’s response you make reference to a pre-existing commercial agreement between yourselves and Packlink (2.7). In that, you claim to have a clause removing customers third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. I would like to request a copy of this contract and confirmation of the date on which the exclusion of third party rights term was included in it. If you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. I also notice that you have destroyed tracking information due to "lapse of time" in line with your data protection policy (2.12). Can you share where this data protection policy is disclosed to customers? I also ask you to forward you a copy of that data protectiono policy, and again if you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. Kind regards,
    • Firstly, thank you for filling in the sticky so quickly - we wish everyone who comes here would do that! You're in the clear.  MET don't know who the driver was.  They can use Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to transfer liability to the keeper if their bilge arrives within 14 days - they didn't send it out till 102 days after!!! So sit on your hands.  MET will come out with threat after threat but ultimately will do nothing. Have a read of other threads for this car park - we are having a tsunami of cases at the moment. Be sure to come back here though if they ever send you a Letter of Claim.  
    • Just received this letter from Lowell.  IMG_1032.pdf
    • I don't think you are misunderstanding. It seems something may have gone missing. HB
    • Hi, Thanks for the reply. The only correspondence I've had from them is attached to the post? Apologies if I'm misunderstanding. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Leespeds vs Lloydstsb


leespeds
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6199 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wow What a site, i never dreamed of being able to get my money back and believe me i tried!

 

I sent of my initial letter today asking for details of the charges statments ect so hope to get those soon! i've had a look on my online banking and i estimate it being around £2000- £3000

 

And Capital 1 and Natwest are next but i'll do seperate threads for those.

 

i've spent the last 6 hours basically reading this site including the FAQ's however if anyone would like to say hi and offer advice i'd be very grateful.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome.

 

You are doing it all right so far but, keep reading!

 

Also look here so you know what to expect.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick qestion and i apologise if it's been asked before but i've read alot of the threads and haven't seen it yet

 

Has anyone claimed for additional costs incurred by these charges as i've had to take out loans and miss payment with others because of these unlawful charges?

 

Its caused me alot of stress and repeatedly had to look to my parents for support!

 

Just a thought let me know!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Leespeds.

 

As your claim will almost certainly be allocated to the small claims track, there is a limit to what you can recoup by way of costs, etc. There is a 'no costs rule' which ultimately is to the benefit of individual claimants acting in person, like you and me. What it means is that we can bring claims against organisations (such as banks, etc), safe in the knowledge that in the event we lost, we would not get screwed for the other sides legal bill - which could be tens of £thousands in some cases. I for one, would not feel quite so comfertable about sueing my bank if it were not for the no costs rule. You would not normally be entitled to a distress and inconveniance award either.

 

You could perhaps go for consequential losses, but this is fairly unchartered territory as far as bank charges claims go. Any losses you claimed would have to be clearly quantifiable as a direct consequence of the unlawful charges. You'd need to do your research on this and be sure that you could substantiate a clear link with evidance to back it up. I think Bean was claiming consequential losses, but I'm not sure how it panned out. Heres his thread - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/4887-beans-timeline-joint-acct.html

 

If you had an account with an overdraft you may want to consider charging interest on the charges at the rate they charged you for being in overdraft - under the implied principle of mutuality and reciprocity. This rate would typically be around 16% if you charged their authorised rate, around 29% if you went for unauthorised. There is no express provision for charging them this rate, but many have been successful in doing so - me included. Again, you'd need to do some research. The subject is discussed and explained in the 'General' forum. Heres a couple of threads - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/7252-new-way-looking-interest.html and - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/18313-why-no-one-claiming.html?highlight=contractual+interest

 

Hope this helps

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

right gos my ass in gear and asked them for all my charges back. they've sent a letter back saying no! (in more words)

 

they say they are service charges not default charges!

 

what do i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome back!:)

That is standard reply, just carry on with your claim, have a read of these:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31460-step-step-instructions.html

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi guy's,

 

little worried about the lloyds win in court. now i want to be fully prepard and don't want to make any mistakes..

 

i'm just about to send my LBA... is there anything i should put in that letter to let lloyds know they were lucky and i'm not going to go down without a fight... any t+c's i can add to the letter ect?

 

cheers

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...