Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with you, UB. More parties might not be such a bad thing. More on Farage's manifesto - sorry, contract.  
    • Sorry but first of all you are still referring to your six-month right to reject – but you didn't assert your right within six months so this is not relevant. The situation is that you cannot reject the vehicle unless it is a write off or you have been deprived of the use of it for a significant period of time so that it can be said that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract. By my understanding that is not the case here. Your complaint must be that they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car. On this basis you are holding them responsible for the cost of repairs which are £XXX and any ancillary costs reasonably incurred as a result of their breach of contract. You are currently without the car and this is not a situation which can continue. You are enclosing the evidence plus quotations for repair and you want that by the end of the week you want them to agree to the repairs. Broadly that. Please post a draft as soon as possible. You don't want to hang around on this
    • Hello folks  Got a letter from overdales the day after I submitted my defence this contains a copy of credit card agreement and a letter stating the account has been sold to lowell. H
    • Seen a number of videos online of interviews with people in town centres around the UK. Those that say they will vote Reform can accurately be described as 'Gammon Faced'. So frustrated with life in 2024 and yearning to switch the clock back many decades, they don't really care about the policies of Reform. What appears to appeal to them about Reform is an old fashioned nostalgic outlook, of trying to get the country back to how it was a very long time ago. Yes much of this is about immigration, but it is also about many other issues such as Equalities legislation, Human Rights etc, which they believe have gone too far. For the above reasons, I don't think many who are looking to vote Reform, will switch their votes back to other parties they have voted for before. From what I have seen in polling, 70% were previously Tory and about 30% Labour. The Tories under Sunak can no longer appeal to those who now back Reform. For example, I doubt any Tory Government would support leaving ECHR, because that would most likely be opposed by the majority in the UK. And many Tory MP's would not support leaving ECHR and the House of Lords would block anyway ignoring any conventions to give way to The Commons. A combination of Brexit, Reform lead by Farage and the average age of this voter demographic is quite likely to lead to the extinction of The Conservative party. What may happen after this election is that the right of politics splits into new groups. Some Tory MP's are likely to jump ship and join Reform. And others will try to relaunch the Conservative brand as a centre right modern party. This could possibly lead to the Lib Dems becoming main opposition party at some point. The outcome of this election could well significantly change UK politics forever. And it is not just about the future of the Tories, Labour with a huge majority may find it difficult to keep some on the left happy with Government progress on tackling some issues. So we may see a fracture within Labour support and new parties formed.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRA group claim form - old Lloyd's loan 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


chis1230
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2748 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes chis, the "Lay" simply means you are not an expert, other than that its your WS as the defendant.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

👍🏻

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst looking around for example ws through numerous threads on here last night I came across shamrocker v pra 19 page thread.

 

Wow to say the least.

 

Can anyone tell me why the case became so legally technical and why my case won't get anywhere near that as I am seriously having doubts about proceeding any further after reading that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gets as complicated as you wish to make it...keep it simple.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys

 

had a go at disclosure and ws if you be so kind to give it the once over please

 

disclosure

 

1 copy of section 77 request (exhibit 1a)

2 reply to section 77 request (exhibits 1b 1c 1d)

3 copy of cpr31.14 request ( exhibit 2a)

4 cpr 31.14 received by signature ( exhibit 2b)

 

 

WITNESS STATEMENT

 

In the ............ county court Claim Number .......

Between:

PRA group (uk) claimant

and

Mrs chis1230 defendant

Witness statement of Mrs chis1230 of xxxxxx (address)

I Mrs chis1230 the defendant in this claim make the following statement believing it to be true will state as follows:-

1. It is admitted that I have entered into a contract with Lloyds in the past. I do not recall the exact details of this contract or know of any outstanding balance.

 

2. I requested that the claimant produce precise details of this agreement by way of a section 77 request sent on 5th July 2016.(exhibit 1a) The only reply i have received states the claimant has requested the required information (exhibit 1b) and that PRA group will classify the debt as unenforceable if the information is not supplied to me within 12 working days ( exhibit 1c) along with a returned postal order fee for £1.(exhibit 1d).

3. I requested that the Claimant prove the exact details of this contract by way of a CPR 31.14 request sent on the 03/08/2016 (exhibit 2a) and shown as signed for on 05/08/2016 (exhibit 2b). To this date no documentation in reply to this request has been provided by the claimant.

4. The claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach as requested by CPR 31.14 and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into a contract and

(b) show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

5.As per CPR 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

6.On the alternative, as the Claimant alleges to be an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act.

 

7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.

 

Signed ……………….

 

Dated on the day ………………..2016

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats not really a witness statement chis...more like a defence.Particularise in your own words the dispute and why you defended.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Andy, even though it wasn't what I wanted to read.

 

Most of that was taken from the cheddar case which you described to isbo as an excellent example of standard disclosure and witness statement, so now I'm even more confused with all the different answers people seem to get for the same problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only chedder case I can find was a small claims track for £300.. a Mobile phone claim.....yours is Fast Track and therefore a lot more complicated and your response should be more in depth.

 

Your disclosure is fine if thats all you wish to refer and rely on.....

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont worry...most defendants have very little disclosure.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you ring the courts they will no doubt tell you they will write giving them a further 7 days.

Frustrating but it happens all the time.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After a quick call to the courts it appears that the claimant has responded to the disclosure.....but

 

 

Only to the court, not to us.

The court wasn't really interested and said it's probably on its way to you.

 

The 24th November is the deadline to apply for inspection of documents, how is this possible if I don't know what documents there is.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

After a quick call to the courts it appears that the claimant has responded to the disclosure.....but

 

 

Only to the court, not to us.

The court wasn't really interested and said it's probably on its way to you.

 

The 24th November is the deadline to apply for inspection of documents, how is this possible if I don't know what documents there is.

 

Thank you

 

Give it until Monday chis and if nothing recieved then I will show you how to get the courts attention for not serving all parties.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the claimant an email and ask to see all documents that they intend disclosing...that you cant specify which as they have failed to serve you their N265..which you have brought to the courts attention for failing to comply with the courts directions dated xxxxxx.

 

Failure to comply with this request will again be brought to the courts attention and you will request an order that sanctions be imposed pursuant to CPR 3.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I be informing the court I am unable to meet the judges directions deadline tomorrow, as the claimant has failed to comply with serving me with their disclosure.

Feel like I should be doing something, not just letting the deadline pass.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

No.... you are able to complete directions (standard disclosure and witness statement)...your not reliant on them complying/serving..you can still inform the court as stated above..

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Omg guys, don't know what to say

 

Mrs just made the call to the courts and guess what........

 

 

The claim has been discontinued

 

Thank you all so very much, another donation will be on its way later on,

Over the moon to say the least.

 

Thanks again

 

Chris & Mrs chis

Link to post
Share on other sites

As expected.....well done... thread title amended to reflect the inevitable :-)

 

Chris you are entitled to claim wasted costs as this claim is in the Fast Track...see CPR 38 (38.6)

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part38#38.6

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...