Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have they actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing benefit issue


farmlama
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2836 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this is long and confusing.

 

I was claiming part housing benefit from December 2013.

 

My youngest daughter started full time school in September 2014

meaning my childcare costs went down.

Being busy all the time I stupidly didn't think to inform the council of this at the time.

 

August 2015 the council wrote asking for proof of childcare costs,

I supplied these and at the same time told them of the change and apologised.

 

I knew I would have gotten an overpayment,

however when they recalculated they did so from May 1st 2014 rather than September 1st

meaning the over payment was 100s of pounds higher than it should have been.

 

I have since written and complained trying to get them to change the date that my childcare costs changed

and they are refusing to re-calculate stating that I should have told them of the change within 4 weeks.

 

I know I made a mistake and I am paying back the overpayment,

but I feel like they are making me pay back extra as a punishment.

 

I have just submitted a complaint to the ombudsmen,

but while I wait to hear back does anyone know if the council can do this?

 

At the time I was rightfully claiming what I was entitled to.

The change in childcare costs didn't begin until September 2014,

so for May-September there was no change to tell them about.

 

I could understand if my childcare cost went up and wanted them to backdate a payment that far

they might say no, but I had claimed what I was entitled to and they are removing my right as a punishment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you asked them directly why the date used was in May? Ask for a statement of reasons

 

They are claiming that because I didn't tell them that my circumstances changed in September they have applied the change from May is all. I will write for a statement of reasons but I have been writing for months and they aren't doing anything.

 

In one of their letters they even state that I had previously provided my childcare costs on 20.5.14 so for the period in question they had the correct info

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they have applied it from the last time you provided proof? Have you provided proof of your costs May- September?

 

As regards when they increased, if you didn't tell them at the time it's treated as a "late beneficial change" and only applied from the date you told them. Changes that would make your benefit go down are however backdated. The council are not punishing you, they are just doing what the regulations require.

 

Not having a go at you, but it's an offence to fail to report a change within 4 weeks of that change ocurring, so in theory you could be interviewed under caution about it.

 

You should appeal the overpayment may- September though - providing the proof of child care costs for that period.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they have applied it from the last time you provided proof? Have you provided proof of your costs May- September?

 

As regards when they increased, if you didn't tell them at the time it's treated as a "late beneficial change" and only applied from the date you told them. Changes that would make your benefit go down are however backdated. The council are not punishing you, they are just doing what the regulations require.

 

Not having a go at you, but it's an offence to fail to report a change within 4 weeks of that change ocurring, so in theory you could be interviewed under caution about it.

 

You should appeal the overpayment may- September though - providing the proof of child care costs for that period.

 

I provided proof of childcare costs on 20.5.14, they have not even put the change from then but earlier (1.5.14).

 

I have supplied the proof of childcare costs for May-September several times since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing changed on 1.5.14

 

I started work in December 2013, and everything stayed the same until September 2014 when my daughter started full time school rather than half days.

 

As it wasn't a big change like changing jobs etc I just didn't think to notify which I know is my fault, but I can't see how they can use that to decide I need to pay back an extra 4 months which I was entitled to

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that the overpayment should be backfated to September when the change happened, but what are the regulations to say they can make up a random date to claw back extra on that?

That's what you need to appeal against.. The date used of 1st May.

 

Have you been through the councils complaint procedure?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what you need to appeal against.. The date used of 1st May.

 

Have you been through the councils complaint procedure?

 

Yes I have appealed and complained for months. I have just submitted it to the local government ombudsman so need to play the waiting game, I just wanted to check if they are right to do that or if I'm wasting my energy on fighting it

Link to post
Share on other sites

No not been to the tribunal service, just wrotten to them and phoned (but told I couldn't complain by phone so had to write) and wait 6-8 weeks for them to reply with the same thing.

 

I have no idea why they are using 1st may, i can only assume they are massively incompetent

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to take it to appeal. Have they not treated your original letter as an appeal? The tribunal service can overturn all or part of the decision. You need to be very clear about wishing to make an appeal to the tribunal service in your letter

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote saying I wanted to appeal their decision but never stated I wanted to appeal to tribunal. That just reassessed (or not) in house several times

 

They should have advised you of further appeal rights. When did your last appeal get turned down?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should have advised you of further appeal rights. When did your last appeal get turned down?

 

They didn't advise of further appeal rights, they just gave a 'computer says no' answer.

 

My stage 2 complaint was turned down in April. On the local government ombudsman website it says you have a year from the first mistake to go to them so I went to them rather than make the stage 3 complaint.

 

I appealed about 3 times before I made the first stage 1 complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to take all your letters to CAB.

They should have made a submission to the tribunal service. You need to appeal that the decision is wrong in law or the wrong information has been used. Submitting a late appeal can be pretty technical, hence suggesting you go to CAB x

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I'm still having issues with this plus additional problems.

 

I eventually managed to speak with a manager who told me they would re calculate my claim correctly, this was weeks ago and I have heard nothing since.

 

In the mean time more has happened. I started a new job in April with better pay, sent a change of income/circumstance form in along with childcare statements, tax credit letter, my 1st payslip. I then got a letter 6 weeks later requesting loads of information including 2 more payslips for my new job, 4 payslips for my old job, 3 monts bank statements for all bank accounts, my p45, proof of childcare (again) the contract for my new job. I sent all this off by the date required on the letter.

 

When they returned the documents, they sent them addressed to and at the address of my childminder (I am waiting for them to contact me as to why and what they are doing about this).

 

I then got a letter saying they need even more information from me of they will stop my claim, including a letter stating when my old job finished, another copy of the statements from my savings account (with a very low balance, I'm not fortunate to have any savings) as the print out that I got in the bank they aren't accepting (I have told them it is an original that I got in the branch but they seem to think I am lying), also they want copies of bank statements for 2 old bank accounts (one closed over a year ago and the other over 3 years ago), they also want even further proof of my childcare and for my childminder to fill out a form (the same form I already filled out with my change of income, the childminder has already written a letter stating amounts paid).

 

Is this excessive, it isn't a new claim, I have just changed jobs and have never had to provide so much. I feel like they are treating me like a criminal by not believing the things I have provided and keep asking for the same things over and over. It's really frustrating me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When they returned the documents, they sent them addressed to and at the address of my childminder (I am waiting for them to contact me as to why and what they are doing about this).

 

I then got a letter saying they need even more information from me of they will stop my claim, including a letter stating when my old job finished, another copy of the statements from my savings account (with a very low balance, I'm not fortunate to have any savings) as the print out that I got in the bank they aren't accepting (I have told them it is an original that I got in the branch but they seem to think I am lying), also they want copies of bank statements for 2 old bank accounts (one closed over a year ago and the other over 3 years ago), they also want even further proof of my childcare and for my childminder to fill out a form (the same form I already filled out with my change of income, the childminder has already written a letter stating amounts paid).

 

Is this excessive, it isn't a new claim

 

Pop in to your bank and ask for printouts of balances on all the accounts the council. Ask for them to be printed on headed paper and date stamped. The bank should be able to generate a report showing the closed accounts and what dates they were closed.

 

Demanding the same information repeatedly is excessive and smacks of incompetence on the part of the council. I would be tempted to pen a strongly worded letter to them and suggest that some of their staff need additional training in document management.

 

As for posting confidential information to a child minder that has no rights or needs to see these documents, it goes beyond incompetence. A formal complaint to the ICO would be in order and hopefully, he will also have some strong words to say about it.

 

If your earnings now take you above the level where you qualify for HB, then there should be no need to provide the latest payslips. It might be worth your while checking with the benefits calculator to see what you are currently entitled to.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...