Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are tiscali in breach of Trade Descriptions and Distance Selling regulations?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm wondering whether or not to sue tiscali or at least give them a threatening complaint letter regarding the service they have provided over the long 10 months of my contract with them (horay!, 2 months to go!).

 

I think that the use of the word "Unlimited" in a broadband product, such as 2 MB Unlimited Broadband is inacurate. As they have a fair usage policy that restricts heavy usage during peak hours (1800-2300 hrs). So, would this be a breach of the trade descriptions act if they advertise an "Unlimited" product and impose restrictions on heavy users during peak hours, which effectively makes it a limited product? The trade descriptions act is supposed to prevent companies making inacurate or misleading statements regarding their products, so this should not happen.

 

This issue also leads me to the distance selling regulations...

 

Now, there are a lot of people on the tiscali forums (including myself) that have complained about this fair usage policy. Because when I bought the product online the advertisement looked like this:

 

Tiscali Unlimited* 2 MB Broadband £17.99 per month.

 

And right down at the botton almost invisible and tucked out of the way you have: *fair usage policy applies

 

Now dosen't this breach the distance sellers regulations? Because before you purchase a product online, arn't you supposed to be told exactly what you are getting and any policies that apply in reasonable plain text so you can make your mind up BEFORE you commit to buy?

 

And when I found out about this policy it was a good 1 month down the line, that was after the 6 weeks it took them to actually get the service running. This means that I am currently paying for a 2MB service that has a maximum download speed of 250 kb/ps during off peak hours. But during peak hours it's around 25 to 50 kb/ps as my usage is being managed under this policy. And tiscali refuse to divulge exactly what they consider to be heavy usage, this becomes a problem, because I keep a copy of my data records (downloads per day totals) and if they did I could possible prove that my usage falls well below what is considered heavy usage. There are a lot of people that I have spoken to, that also claim that they never use the service during peak hours and yet they have been warned or "capped" for no reason whatsoever.

 

People are just not aware that these restrictions are in place until it's too late. And under the distance sellers regulations you have a right to cancel, but because they take so long to advise you of this, it's way past your 14 day cancellation date. Therefore you are locked into a 12 month contract for a service that you can only use when you are unemployed. As it's only off peak from the time you goto sleep to the time you come home from work. :-x

 

I am also wondering if tiscali have a legal duty to refund some of the additional costs that where incurred by me at the beginning and later on in my contract with them. Because I registered for broadband on the 27/01/2006. It took them 6 weeks to provision the line, and during this time I used their dialup (pay as you go). Now they where only supposed to take 10 working days to install the broadband, am I legally entitled to claim the cost of these internet calls back from tiscali because of their delays in provisioning the service?

 

And... In april 2006, I had to temporarily move address whilst my landlord did repairs on my flat. The same thing happened then.. I asked tiscali to transfer the service to my new address and they didn't. So for 2 months I had to use dialup and had to pay for the internet calls... So for 2 months I was without broadband and had to pay over £100 to BT for using dialup. Does anyone think I would be able to recover some of them costs? Tiscali did refund me 2 months broadband, but did not accept liability for the phone calls to the internet. Even though I provided evidence that I had done so with their own internet usage data and my BT itemised phone bill.

 

Any suggestions from anyone would be greatly appreciated... as it's impossible to complain to tiscali as I have to speak to their offshore call centres or communicate via e-mail to the same country. They either ignore you or give an illegible response.

 

Thank you.

 

p.s: if you don't beleive me, just follow this link Broadband Provider - Tiscali Broadband and ask yourself, is this clear enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have had this issue with Tiscali, we were 5 months into the 12 month contract with them when we found out 'unlimited' was not actually unlimited due to the fair use policy. After about 2 or 3 weeks of calling and complaining and then cancelling the direct debit to them they have got the message and they finally have let us out of the contract.

 

If you are that unhappy as we were its worth persevering to their cancellation line and in the end they will give up and give you a mac key to move.

HSBC Prelim sent 7/8 for £1062 -

Give me my money!!

LBA sent 16/8 (thanks to Debs77!!)

Offer received 24/8 £995 - accepted

 

Nationwide Prelim sent 5/9 for £3090.50

Nothing heard - LBA sent 20/9

Letter received telling us to go bank elsewhere if we are not happy - We will when we get our money thanks!

MCOL filed 8/11

Part payments received 16/11

Notice to defend 17/11

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've also had problems with tiscali, I did manage to find their number for head office in london where customer compaints are here it is 02070872000. these people allegedly know what their talking about and can make decisions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is tucked away, however it is there, and its a lot clearer then most company's make it.

By Signing up to any online agreement, you confirm that you have read and understood the terms and conditions of the contract. Having ready these t&c myself, they are currently in there, which means that you have confirmed you have read, understood and accepted this fair usage policy. Meaning that they have not misinformed you or misold the service in that way.

 

Understandably you used a dial-up service whilst you did not have the internet, however it is generally your responsibility. There are fee services out there like bt anytime for dial-up connections which would have kept this amount during this period down. (See section 14 of there T&C)

 

Its not called the small print because its in 20 inch neon letters, you do need to read it, and you have said you have read it.

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

After semi sticking up for them in my previous post, I am now having problems with them.

 

I am supposed to have an 8 meg connection, the most I can ever download at is about 1 meg on a good day!!

 

The service is awfull. Just take a look at their customer forums on their site!!

 

I work with computers and networking for a living so I know it is nothing my end.

 

Luckly I am moving house soon so I will get out of this contract and go with a decent ISP :)

 

 

Dont touch Tiscali with a barge pole!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I think it is most of the customers who know what a broadband connection should run like!

 

I think the only people not complaining are the ones who dont know any better or cant be arsed!

 

You just have to look at their forums, it is full of people complaining about speed issues:

 

Tiscali Forums - Broadband Service Support

 

Also have a look here:

 

ISPreview UK - Internet Service Provider Information Source

Link to post
Share on other sites

These reviews sum it up:

 

174 Reviews for Tiscali Broadband www.tiscali.co.uk

 

Broadband Choices: Tiscali reviews by site users

 

Date Added Review Title

23-Jan-2007 » poor service

22-Jan-2007 » A real joke ive never had the speed i pay for in over 3 years

16-Jan-2007 » Lack of Speed

13-Jan-2007 » get your act together

13-Jan-2007 » Tiscali Not Delivering

5-Dec-2006 » TISCALI at one-tenth promised speed

5-Dec-2006 » Excellent connection and speed

30-Nov-2006 » Tiscali just gets worse and worse

22-Nov-2006 » Contention must be high

8-Nov-2006 » Get you fingure out Tiscali

2-Nov-2006 » poor speed

28-Oct-2006 » Not happy bunny

18-Oct-2006 » Total Pony Dont Bother

16-Oct-2006 » extremely poor speeds and worse customer servise

13-Oct-2006 » leave tiscali and ull be sorry

2-Oct-2006 » slow and restricted

27-Sep-2006 » USEFUL TISCALI TEL NO FOR PEOPLE HAVING PROBLEMS

18-Sep-2006 » 8m max figment of the imagination

14-Sep-2006 » unlimited between 11pm and 6pm only

12-Sep-2006 » do NOT go with tiscali aka ****cali

8-Sep-2006 » improving possibly

7-Sep-2006 » slow and getting slower

7-Sep-2006 » speed worse than dialup

28-Aug-2006 » Shockingly low speeds

9-Aug-2006 » extremely low speed

30-Jul-2006 » Rubbish Speeds

11-Jul-2006 » Lack of speed

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...